15:00:09 #startmeeting ironic 15:00:09 Meeting started Mon Nov 11 15:00:09 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dtantsur. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:12 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 15:00:26 who's up for the ironic meeting? :) 15:00:29 o/ 15:00:30 #chair TheJulia 15:00:30 Current chairs: TheJulia dtantsur 15:00:37 o/ 15:00:38 o/ 15:00:51 I think that surrogates ^ might be caused by funny filenames 15:00:53 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic is our agenda 15:01:06 etingof: nope, it's a regression in the last patch that tried to read /dev/vda as unicode 15:01:13 an easy fix, working on it 15:01:32 the agenda is a bit outdated, sorry for that 15:01:35 Lo 15:01:51 #topic Announcements / Reminder 15:02:00 I hope everyone enjoyed the Summit. How was it? 15:02:19 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PVG-Ironic-Planning notes 15:03:23 anyone has anything to announce or remind of? 15:03:51 * kaifeng has a good experience 15:04:49 Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/ironic-python-agent master: Do not try to read raw disk data as unicode https://review.opendev.org/693711 15:05:03 o* 15:05:05 o/ 15:05:42 * iurygregory also had a good experience =) 15:06:28 great :) 15:07:24 #topic Review subteam status reports (capped at ten minutes) 15:07:32 o/ 15:07:38 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard line 256 15:07:49 (I don't think there's much to review, but still) 15:09:04 the whole dhcpless patch chain can be reviewed if possible 15:09:23 * iurygregory is wondering if Train Priorities should change to Ussuri 15:10:12 iurygregory: fair enough 15:10:15 * jroll walks in late \o 15:10:25 etingof: we should really pile on the spec now 15:10:48 yes, please 15:12:56 anything on the statuses? I guess things haven't really changed 15:14:18 moving on? 15:14:26 looks like so, ++ 15:14:31 ++ 15:15:24 #topic Deciding on priorities for the coming week 15:15:57 mgoddard: I think we can do another IPA-builder release soon 15:16:34 dtantsur: ready when you are 15:16:38 mgoddard: I am :) 15:16:48 coming right up 15:16:56 so, the L3 deploy spec is there, inspector managed boot is there. anything else to add? 15:18:19 * dtantsur hears crickets 15:19:00 what's the status of L190-191? it seems blocked for a while 15:19:43 xXraphXx: if you're around ^^^ 15:20:00 kaifeng: I'll try to have a look as soon as I can. This is for UEFI booting s/w RAIDs. 15:20:15 arne_wiebalck: will you have time this week? 15:20:25 kaifeng: Some of this is covered in another patch I put up. 15:20:47 dtantsur: Next is more likely. 15:20:58 dtantsur: I'll try. 15:21:04 okay, so maybe drop from the list for now? unless xXraphXx has some time? 15:21:26 I think xXraphXx is mostly waiting for feedback, no? 15:21:37 arne_wiebalck: got it, thanks for the sync up :) 15:22:02 We pushed this to after the Train release. 15:22:19 Saying we would need some more time to discuss and review this. 15:22:24 at the very least it needs rebasing 15:22:33 dtantsur: ok 15:22:38 but the time to discuss may be now indeed 15:22:57 dtantsur: right 15:23:22 dtantsur: as in *now* ? 15:23:33 as in ~ this week 15:23:36 * arne_wiebalck is still jet-lagged 15:23:43 ok, I'll try to 15:23:56 for the rootfs there is another patch I proposed 15:24:24 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686585/ 15:24:25 patch 686585 - ironic-python-agent - Software RAID: Use UUID to find root fs - 4 patch sets 15:24:32 I'll add this ... 15:24:56 ++ 15:25:04 * etingof -> short errand 15:26:09 I have a UEFI node and I am testing no RAID booting atm, maybe I can squeeze in some testing for xXraphXx patches ... 15:26:27 would be awesome 15:27:12 are we good with the list? 15:29:16 * dtantsur assumes yes 15:29:31 ++ (though the list is a bit fat) 15:29:49 we should see more people this week hopefully 15:30:10 #topic Open discussion 15:30:56 anything? 15:31:24 for the poll mode deployment, i want to throw a stone for some input 15:31:57 how about a new deploy interface instead of a configuration option? 15:32:21 you mean, 3 new deploy interfaces? 15:34:40 one deploy interface for poll mode 15:35:42 based on which of 3 existing? 15:37:53 well, i am confused, i was thinking a deploy interface like iscsi and agent 15:41:03 right, but based on which deployment technologies? 15:41:16 will it use iscsi for transferring the image? an HTTP link? something else? 15:44:38 straightforward way would be iscsi, because it's totally driven by ironic side 15:45:29 so, the way I understand your proposal is that you're going to take one of existing deploy interfaces, clone it and reverse the flow of communication. is it correct? 15:45:34 but i would prefer to push image to IPA, haven't gone into details yet. 15:46:12 my concern is that somebody will ask to clone all 3 existing interfaces with the reversed flow 15:46:17 yes, i think it's the idea 15:46:21 maybe I'm overthinking it 15:46:48 I think somebody will do that 15:48:07 kaifeng: I'm not opposed to the idea, but I'm not sure how much we'll win 15:49:14 anyway, we can probably continue after the meeting 15:49:21 anything else? 15:49:31 yep, typing slow :( 15:50:04 i mean no anything else .. 15:50:32 #endmeeting