15:00:11 <iurygregory> #startmeeting ironic
15:00:11 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Mon May 23 15:00:11 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is iurygregory. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:11 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:11 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'ironic'
15:00:13 <iurygregory> o/
15:00:16 <dtantsur> o/
15:00:17 <rpittau> o/
15:00:21 <rpioso> o/
15:00:21 <matfechner> o/
15:00:26 <ajya> o/
15:00:30 <iurygregory> Hello everyone, welcome to our weekly meeting!
15:00:32 <kamlesh6808c> o/
15:01:02 <iurygregory> you can find the agenda for the meeting in the wiki
15:01:10 <iurygregory> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Agenda_for_next_meeting
15:01:38 <iurygregory> #topic Announcements / Reminder
15:01:48 <TheJulia> o/
15:02:17 <iurygregory> #info Please provide feedback to the Zed Themes patch
15:02:19 <iurygregory> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/841061
15:02:25 <JayF> o/
15:02:33 <stendulker_> o/
15:02:35 * iurygregory has no idea why is on merge-conflict will check later...
15:03:08 <iurygregory> #info Dinner in Berlin Etherpad - Please vote in the restaurant/pubs till EOW =)
15:03:15 <opendevreview> Verification of a change to openstack/bifrost stable/yoga failed: Use libvirt-python from the distribution on Red Hat systems  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/842302
15:03:19 <iurygregory> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-dinner-ois2022Berlin
15:04:24 <iurygregory> For those who will be in the OIS Berlin, we are planning to have a dinner, if you are interested please add you name in the etherpad and vote for the day you are available and the restaurants/pubs
15:04:57 <iurygregory> does anyone have anything else to add for announcements/reminder?
15:06:37 <iurygregory> ok, moving on
15:07:09 <iurygregory> we don't have any action item so skipping
15:07:26 <iurygregory> #topic Review subteam status reports
15:07:34 <iurygregory> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard
15:07:45 <iurygregory> starting L65
15:13:56 <iurygregory> I think we can move on
15:14:06 <dtantsur> yeah, seems so
15:14:49 <iurygregory> #topic Deciding on priorities for the coming week
15:14:59 <iurygregory> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+hashtag:ironic-week-prio
15:15:17 <iurygregory> I will be adding some backports I'm working on later today
15:15:56 <TheJulia> Seems reasonable
15:16:10 <kamlesh6808c> Can we put priority tag for this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-tempest-plugin/+/838462
15:16:20 <dtantsur> please add https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/842574 as well
15:17:28 <iurygregory> kamlesh6808c, by any chance do you have some log execution that shows this problem happening? it would be good to have a story with it and add in the commit message =)
15:18:14 <iurygregory> added both patches to the list
15:18:31 <kamlesh6808c> iurygregory, Yes.Would do that.Thanks!
15:19:03 <iurygregory> Tks!
15:19:39 <iurygregory> we have some bifrost patches to fix CI I think
15:21:10 <TheJulia> Has the tag been added to them?
15:22:00 <iurygregory> no, I'm trying to find the patches to see if they got reviews / or add the tag
15:22:57 <dtantsur> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/842302 keeps failing in the gate
15:24:36 <iurygregory> yeah I just saw this patch, I added the hashtag to it, just in case we need to fix something in case of a config problem etc
15:25:26 <iurygregory> I think we can move on, if anyone has patches that will need review let us know or add the hashtag =)
15:25:47 <iurygregory> #topic Baremetal SIG
15:25:50 <iurygregory> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/bare-metal-sig
15:26:03 <iurygregory> arne_wiebalck, do you have any updates you would like to share?
15:28:26 <iurygregory> I think Arne is busy today =)
15:28:37 <TheJulia> I suspect many are busy today
15:28:42 <iurygregory> yeah
15:28:57 <TheJulia> Also, presentation review deadlines and such are likely coming up for internal approvals in some orgs
15:29:32 <iurygregory> skipping rfe topic since we don't have any
15:29:38 <iurygregory> #topic Open discussion
15:30:01 <iurygregory> Does anyone have something that would like to discuss?
15:31:01 <TheJulia> So, I've been asked to turn the "lets fix this nasty nova bug patch" in a spec for discussion
15:31:01 <ebbex> a review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/836172 ?
15:31:18 <TheJulia> because there are conflicting views on it as well as major differences of opinion on how it should be handled
15:31:44 <TheJulia> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/842015
15:31:54 <TheJulia> If anyone wants to take a look
15:32:36 <iurygregory> ebbex, for you case we can add the patch in the list of priority to review I would say
15:33:05 * iurygregory looks at the spec link
15:34:02 <ebbex> iurygregory: thanks :)
15:36:55 <arne_wiebalck> sorry, was in another meeting: nothing for the SIG really :)
15:38:51 <iurygregory> TheJulia, the bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017980 ?
15:39:08 <TheJulia> iurygregory: amongst them, yes
15:39:29 <TheJulia> there are multiple bugs wrapped into one issue
15:39:49 <TheJulia> Each with implications, and not fixing them together just kind of pushes the problem around the plate as it were
15:39:50 <iurygregory> oh the other bugs in launchpad right?
15:39:53 <TheJulia> yeah
15:40:14 <TheJulia> There may be more bugs in RHBZ as well, I didn't go dig through the depths of it when I was writing the document up
15:40:27 <TheJulia> I only used what was at my finger tips
15:40:37 <iurygregory> gotcha, no worries
15:41:07 * iurygregory will need more coffee in a few minutes...
15:41:23 <TheJulia> coffee++
15:42:54 <iurygregory> the idea is to try to get some ironic folks to look at it and provide feedback to see if we can get a consensus on the path nova/ironic should take in the multiple issues we have documented in the spec?
15:43:43 <TheJulia> That would be ideal yes
15:44:09 <TheJulia> Nova has some... differing perceptions on acceptability, such as a knob to enable the bugfix is generally viewed as unacceptable
15:44:38 <TheJulia> They also want to lean on only fixing the issues/state when manual action has occured
15:44:38 <iurygregory> yeah =(
15:45:07 <iurygregory> woot? O.o
15:45:12 <TheJulia> Or automatic from explicit state changes. There are a number of worries there, so it is important to try and navigate them
15:45:20 <TheJulia> And maybe the usage is a little different
15:45:21 <iurygregory> do they have a way to identify it was a manual action?
15:45:50 <TheJulia> arne_wiebalck: it would be useful if somebody from CERN could chime in
15:46:23 <TheJulia> iurygregory: what I mean is "nova-manage ironic fix-cluster-host-fields"
15:46:31 <TheJulia> or something along those lines
15:46:54 <TheJulia> or explicitly set the compute services to disabled and then and only then would rebalance occur... or soemthing along those lines
15:47:04 <TheJulia> All rather, abstract at the moment
15:47:42 <iurygregory> I think I understood
15:48:07 <iurygregory> I've added myself in the spec and I will try to look after finishing all backports I need to push
15:48:55 <TheJulia> Thanks
15:51:34 <iurygregory> np =)
15:51:46 <iurygregory> I will run the meeting next week o/
15:51:50 <iurygregory> Thanks everyone!
15:52:50 <iurygregory> #endmeeting