15:00:03 #startmeeting ironic 15:00:03 Meeting started Mon May 20 15:00:03 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is TheJulia. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:03 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 15:00:04 o/ 15:00:33 o/ 15:00:50 Good morning everyone in (UGT) Universal Greeting Time! 15:00:59 Today's ironic meeting can be found on the wiki 15:01:11 o/ 15:01:21 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Agenda_for_May_20.2C_2024 15:02:08 ... do we have quorum today? 15:02:15 * TheJulia puts a cup of coffee in front of iurygregory 15:02:19 :) 15:02:22 o/ 15:02:33 * iurygregory was looking at logs and lost track of time 15:02:40 #topic Announcements / Reminders 15:03:04 Your weekly standing reminder to review patches tagged with ironic-week-prio 15:03:13 #link https://tinyurl.com/ironic-weekly-prio-dash 15:03:26 The work items for 2024.2 have been merged. 15:03:34 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/916295 15:03:49 And last, but not least, the release schedule for 2024.2 15:03:56 #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html 15:04:09 This does mean this week is R-19 15:04:20 #topic Review Ironic CI Status 15:04:44 so, how is CI? I've noticed some more tempest test unahppiness which I'm working on trying to fix 15:05:38 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-tempest-plugin/+/919762 15:06:00 interesting ^ 15:06:25 Yeah, i think part of it is the whole "oh, there is no way we're doing a whole OS on this cloud provider" logic path 15:06:38 and our continued reliance on tinycore is sort of... biting us 15:06:45 Like an unhappy cat. 15:06:49 ++ 15:06:58 Anyway, moving on! 15:07:02 will keep on my radar 15:07:10 It looks like a timeout, fwiw 15:07:22 but you actually have to look at the ipxe text 15:07:34 Moving past Discussion topics, to Bug Deputy Updates 15:07:38 #topic Bug Deputy 15:08:22 Last week we got down to 137 open bugs against ironic itself. A number of them are wishlist items, we should really take a look at open in progress items because I found a few which were already fixed last week. 15:08:22 I will be the deputy this week o/ 15:08:42 #action iurygregory to be the Bug Deputy for this week. 15:08:52 great job TheJulia 15:09:01 Since we have no RFE topics, we will move to Open Disucssion. 15:09:05 #topic Open Discussion 15:09:17 I have an item for this, when mohammed_ is done 15:09:25 \o/ as do I! 15:09:33 mohammed_ is seeking reviews of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/sushy-tools/+/875366 15:09:38 I would like to take this forward it seems hanging there for longtime I want to know if somthing is blocking I have already got +1 from dmitry 15:09:49 I'm generally curious what the use case is? I always viewed sushy-tools as being about helping Ironic fake VMs, if we stub even further through doesn't it remove some of the value? 15:09:58 I've avoided putting this review on your change because I don't wanna stop it if there's a good use case (sushy-tools is not high on the list of things I'm super concerned about) but I'm curious generally what the goal is 15:10:22 I think a better understanding of the goal will help reviewers review it, to be honest 15:10:26 ++ 15:10:38 we need mainly to testing ironic scalability but open to discuss the needs for such fake IPAs on the sushytools on the changes :) 15:10:59 What does IPA have to do with sushy? 15:11:02 I guess is my root problem 15:11:16 sushy is a library for redfish access; sushy-tools uses that library to present fake VMs 15:11:23 why not fake IPA in virtualbmc? or virtualpdu? 15:11:34 there's a base level misalignment that I can't figure out 15:11:40 sushy has fake system faking the VM and ironic expect ipa agent to be running on these vms that we are trying to add there 15:12:13 Fake driver ^ 15:13:18 is the intention or modeling at present such that triggering a fake run cause the fake IPA to fire up? 15:14:12 I guess that sort of makes sense then 15:14:13 the current model have the fakeIPA and sushytools running in different containers 15:14:18 okay 15:14:25 So my final question, will results be published at all? 15:14:26 :) 15:14:46 Did not get you :/ 15:14:56 I'm still confused enough about the whole end-to-end I doubt I'll review that change, but honestly sushy{,-tools} is not my strongest project anyway 15:15:06 mohammed_: I think TheJulia is saying, if you land this and do performance testing, share the results with us :D 15:15:21 So your doing the delopment work to bench test Ironic, are those results available for review? 15:15:39 we are syncing together on these on metal3 side with dmitry 15:16:21 Okay, cool 15:16:32 JayF: You had an open discussion item? 15:16:38 Yes 15:16:44 June 5th is the BM SIG @ CERN. 15:16:59 It's been noted that we can enable remote participation if desired 15:17:10 That would be nice 15:17:11 :O 15:17:28 ++ 15:17:42 Then we need to discuss time. Right now the proposed start time is 10am, which is 1am pdt 15:17:57 obviously not ideal but we can change it; I'm a little nervous about doing it because we already have some published 15:18:05 but I didn't want to make the decision in a vacuum 15:18:21 I doubt that there's a time we could pick that would be 1) close to the original published time and 2) not terrible for PDT 15:18:56 we list an 8am start right now on the webpage 15:19:01 #link https://indico.cern.ch/event/1378171/ 15:19:28 JayF: I will do my best to join in remotely based upon the local schedule, start based upon the people there 15:19:44 yeah, that's what I was thinking -- which would be a 10am start for presentations, I think 15:19:45 8 AM is a bit early if one needs to train in and all 15:19:58 yeah, that seems reasonable 15:20:21 I think it would be complicated to change the time now, I had no idea it could have remote participation, I will just try to join 15:20:24 I'll note the agenda currently includes an introduction to metal3, an ~45-60m talk by me on "ironic features" 15:20:31 and then hackathon/discussion afterwards 15:20:51 Sounds good 15:20:54 the goal is to hopefully inspire lots of "how does feature X work?" conversations after the presentations :D 15:21:02 the other, related item for OD for me 15:21:20 I will be in Europe next week and the week after. I'll be very rarely on IRC as a result to focus on my in-person team in UK and all 15:21:28 So if you need me, email/sms/etc 15:21:37 JayF: cool cool, enjoy 15:21:46 so my one last item! 15:22:09 ihrachys has raised some questions/comments on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/916126. JayF and I have both responded. If there are any more thoughts/responses please try and post it in the next day or so and I'll rev the spec. 15:22:50 Anything else today? 15:23:36 I'll note next Monday is a holiday in the US. 15:23:51 Please review the self-serve runbooks spec :D 15:23:56 ++ 15:23:57 ack o/ 15:23:57 that is on hold pending community review right now 15:24:10 this week I have more "free" time 15:24:17 so I will double check it 15:24:21 what is "free" time ;) 15:24:38 a time I will not spend testing firmware update or on escalation :D 15:24:52 * JayF hears a new jira ticket being filed 15:24:57 run iurygregory! 15:25:08 well I got an escalation from a bug created today 15:25:21 I'm not surprised because is monday 15:25:29 in accordance with the prophecy 15:25:34 yup! 15:26:08 iurygregory: if you need another brain, I can deffer some stuff I was planning on doing this morning until tomorrow 15:26:13 anyway! Thanks everyone! 15:26:16 Have a great week! 15:26:29 o/ 15:26:35 #endmeeting