15:00:54 #startmeeting ironic 15:00:54 Meeting started Mon Apr 28 15:00:54 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is TheJulia. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:54 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 15:00:56 o/ 15:01:00 o/ 15:01:08 o/ 15:01:09 Of course we have a meeting! 15:01:14 o/ 15:01:16 Good morning everyone! 15:01:48 o/ 15:02:07 nice \o/ I have an RFE for discussion XD, forgot to add to the agenda 15:02:09 I guess I'm chairing? 15:02:24 yup =) 15:03:07 do we have quorum? 15:03:13 okay, give me a couple minutes to clean up the agenda, I suspect we do... 15:03:30 (who let our meeting runner designee go on pto? ;) 15:04:06 maybe I should take over since I'm the Events Liaison lol 15:04:31 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Agenda_for_April_28.2C_2025 15:04:37 Our agenda this week is located on the wiki! 15:04:54 #topic Announcements / Reminders 15:05:14 Standing reminder to review patches tagged ironic-week-prio and to hashtag any patches ready for review with ironic-week-prio: https://tinyurl.com/ironic-weekly-prio-dash 15:05:43 This week is week R-22 on the release schedule. 15:05:46 #link https://releases.openstack.org/flamingo/schedule.html 15:05:56 Does anyone have anything else they would like to raise awareness of? 15:06:29 my mind is blank after 3hrs of meeting :D 15:06:38 heh 15:06:39 Okay 15:07:03 The next OpenInfra Summit will be October 17-19th outside of Paris. 15:07:10 #link https://summit2025.openinfra.org/ 15:07:35 The CFP is now open as well 15:07:37 #link https://summit2025.openinfra.org/cfp/ 15:07:46 till June 13th (I think) 15:07:58 #topic Working Group Updates 15:08:11 First up is the standalone networking working group, is there an update? 15:08:29 not so much an update, but I wanted to get started on this. 15:08:54 Agreed, It seems like maybe it could be worthwhile to organize a call to try and get discussion and consensus building going 15:08:58 I am willing to put some info on the ether pad to start by maybe highlighting some areas that need to some clarification/decisions. 15:09:12 alegacy_: I think that sounds like an excellent idea! 15:09:35 I think the next step beyond that is to try to explicitly schedule a synchronous call to get on the same page 15:09:50 Anything else for standalone networking today? 15:10:08 ok, I have been juggling some things but this is now my priority so I can scratch together some high level points today or tomorrow morning 15:10:58 Perfect, from there I guess its just a asynchronous prod to continue discussion 15:11:04 Ready to move on? 15:11:05 k 15:11:58 For the integrated use case working group, no forward movement this past week. Folks have been heads down with other matters and the specification remains awaiting more feedback 15:11:59 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/945642 15:12:19 Worth noting, Kaifeng has also raised an item, but we'll discuss that in RFE review 15:12:21 Onward! 15:12:49 #topic Discussion topics 15:13:17 It looks like a question has been raised regarding topics, specifically: "Permanent agenda points based on work items/priorities?" 15:13:22 thoughts? 15:14:04 * TheJulia gets out a pallet of crickets 15:14:27 if it helps, why not? =) 15:15:07 I suspect working groups is an early attempt to align to that, I guess we're always free to evolve the agenda as we move on 15:15:11 In that case, We can move on I guess 15:15:15 #topic Bug Deputy Updates 15:15:17 ++ 15:15:38 Our agenda says we have 7 new bugs and 2 new RFEs 15:15:46 First RFE! 15:16:04 Yeah. combination of the previous week 15:16:10 I would say 3, but I added one to RFE Review lol 15:16:12 :D 15:16:23 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/2106550 15:16:50 That is a "noop" deploy interface. Seemed like we found a maybe better idea during the ptg, we just need to revisit it 15:17:10 I still support the idea :D 15:17:10 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-baremetal/+bug/2106721 15:17:24 This is a restconf interface proposal for networking-baremetal 15:17:57 I think the broad idea is reasonable, just would require more details and realistically patches 15:18:07 agree 15:18:15 ++ 15:18:22 we need a "propose patches and we'll likely just merge them" label 15:19:12 we need a nice acronym and use as label in launchpad :D 15:19:54 any objection to just saying "rfe-approved" and telling them we need more detail as well 15:20:06 none on my side 15:20:28 done 15:20:43 Next item! 15:20:44 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/2107998 15:20:52 This is iurygregory's nic firmware update change 15:20:57 err, rfe 15:21:05 yeah =) 15:21:27 just wondering if we will need a spec for it 15:21:37 or if the RFE would be enough =) 15:21:41 iurygregory: still trying to digest 15:21:50 sure, take your time :D 15:21:51 quick question, the dl380 gen10, not plus hardware 15:22:01 go ahead =) 15:22:06 you indicate it cannot be updated, do they just show false for all devices? 15:22:13 it does 15:22:54 I have a downstream doc with details if you want to check, happy to add a few things to the rfe also 15:23:23 Sharing some of those details with upstream would be helpful 15:23:24 it returned iLO.2.16.UpdateInvalidFile :D 15:23:35 I honestly think this could use a spec of some sort, just to kind of set the common expectation 15:23:43 overall, I'm all for it, just don't know the edges of the shape 15:23:56 so right now it feels like I can hear it, but not really see it 15:24:02 nor feel the edges 15:24:13 tks for the feedback TheJulia o/ 15:24:38 so I'm thinking rfe-approved, but still needs a spec mainly to level set, so I guess sign me up as a reviewer for it 15:25:08 ack 15:25:41 I've updated the rfe 15:25:47 tks! 15:26:03 Final item, unless someone else raises an item 15:26:05 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/947961?usp=search 15:26:21 Kaifeng proposed a rate limiting spec for port binding 15:26:32 ... I think it kind of actually makes a ton of sense, but likely just needs to be renamed 15:26:41 since we have an idea of concurrency limits internally, already 15:27:18 from the title and description I do like the idea, I will add the spec to my list to take a look 15:27:20 this is much more a "Oh, I can stall for a while" concurrency limit as opposed to "wait, is someone trying to delete the cloud or deploy all the machines to mine bitcoin" 15:27:58 #lifelessons 15:28:02 ++ 15:28:26 Okay then! 15:28:37 Anyone have any other rfe items or similar items to discuss today? 15:29:29 none from me 15:29:31 None from here 15:30:47 I've suggested to Kaifeng that it gets done as a database side concurrency limit/locking 15:31:01 ack 15:31:02 So, anyway, onward! 15:31:52 #topic Open Discussion 15:31:59 Anything else to discuss this week? 15:32:12 Aside from maybe who is going to chair next week's meeting? 15:32:23 I can 15:32:44 cool, cool. Thanks iurygregory! 15:32:52 np 15:35:49 Anything else?! 15:35:58 Please I have this patch for second reviewer for over a week now. could someone help me look into it. Thankhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/946725 you 15:38:11 * TheJulia wonders if Gerrit needs coffee 15:39:27 I approved it 15:39:34 Anyway, thanks everyone, have a great week! 15:39:36 #endmeeting