15:00:09 #startmeeting ironic 15:00:09 Meeting started Mon Jun 8 15:00:09 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is JayF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 15:00:20 Hey all, welcome to the Ironic meeting. We're following the OpenInfra Code of Conduct. 15:00:28 Agenda is at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic 15:00:37 #topic Announcements/Reminders 15:00:49 Please review things hashtag:ironic-week-prio. Need reviews? Add that hashtag. 15:00:59 #link https://tinyurl.com/ironic-weekly-prio-dash 15:01:03 o/ 15:01:07 I'll give us a few minutes for quorum to develop 15:01:08 o/ 15:01:22 o/ 15:01:38 o/ 15:01:48 * TheJulia wonders if a "qourum compiler" exists 15:01:51 o/ 15:03:47 o/ 15:04:07 o/ 15:05:03 Alright! First up 15:05:06 #topic Working Group Updates 15:05:11 Anything to speak to here around Async IO? 15:06:43 That's a lot of silence I'm going to take as a no. 15:06:52 The other working group item I added here was around Security 15:07:22 for some context; there's an Ironic "coresec" team -- myself, TheJulia, rpittau, dtantsur -- we are the folks who initially get access to security sensitive bug reports and deal with their disposition. 15:07:25 And we've been busy! 15:07:39 exceptionally so. 15:07:42 Last week, Ironic released three OSSA (advisories) and one OSSN (note). 15:08:31 #link https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2026 15:08:36 #undo 15:08:36 Removing item from minutes: #link https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2026 15:08:41 #link https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2026-017.html 15:08:52 #link https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2026-018.html 15:08:55 #link https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2026-019.html 15:09:08 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OSSN/OSSN-0099 15:10:16 Please let someone know if you have any issue with the fixes. 15:10:26 #topic Discussion Topics 15:10:55 Improvement to firmware updates -- PTG followup has iurygregory (not here?) and janders listed 15:11:16 I think the conversation happened last time 15:11:24 I *think* this was done last meeting, yes 15:11:30 ack; moving on 15:11:33 #topic Bug Deputy Updates 15:11:37 Sort of did, jacob followed up with an initial spec super early this morning 15:11:37 Mahnoor is listed as bug deputy 15:12:00 #undo 15:12:00 Removing item from minutes: #topic Bug Deputy Updates 15:12:17 3 new bugs in ironic, and 1 RFE 15:12:25 TheJulia: the spec isn't attached to the bug in the agenda 15:12:38 Mahnoor: hang on, wanna make sure janders' work gets recognized properly 15:12:49 ack 15:12:55 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/992208 15:13:03 Please take time and review the spec posted by janders this morning :) 15:13:09 now to kick it over to Mahnoor :D 15:13:11 #topic Bug Deputy Updates 15:13:31 There were 3 new bugs in ironic :) 15:13:49 I've mentioned in the notes the links 15:14:24 Do we have a volunteer to bug deputy next week? 15:15:32 I don't mind. 15:15:52 #action cid is bug deputy next week 15:15:53 By the way, kudos to the coresec team on security fixes so far 15:16:05 ++, must be a lot 15:16:35 Yup :-) 15:16:54 #topic RFE Review 15:16:59 We have one listed in here, hopefully not stale 15:17:06 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/2154817 15:17:11 it was commented that it was a duplicate of 15:17:22 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/2098693 15:18:17 Its part of Outreachy, it says. But I was a little confused by multiple people working on it..and why there was a need to duplicate 15:18:35 Its not a crisis though :) 15:18:46 i, too, have been confused about this 15:19:10 a lot of the things being worked on are things we'd often ask for a spec for, too 15:19:11 like API changes 15:19:13 me too, and I'm directly involved :D 15:19:29 it seemed a little weird to have a bunch of new folks drop in working on an API change we didn't have specified 15:19:38 that was a misunderstanding 15:19:54 rpittau: even better! 15:19:59 I know we are often loosey goosey with specs so I didn't wanna assume lol 15:20:29 I feel like, yes, there is a validity to what multiple folks seem to be trying to drive forward 15:20:40 There are some baseline challenges though, I want them all to be successful 15:21:03 obviously, that is not *always* possible 15:21:05 we've reduced the scope of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/983349 15:21:05 our outreachy intern estherd[m] will work on the rest 15:21:41 is this just a case of others seeing the project and maybe thinking they could possibly still qualify if they go work it separately? 15:22:27 no, it was mistaken as something open to all the outreachy candidates 15:22:30 or they thought it was part of the contribution phase? 🤔 15:22:34 yeah 15:22:36 oh, i see 15:22:36 kind of 15:24:03 So we should mark that new bug as a dupe? Or the old one? 15:24:09 What's the adjudication here for Mahnoor to execute 15:24:51 not a duplicate, we'll close the fdirst one once the relataed patch merges 15:25:00 ack, okie dokie :D 15:25:04 thanks :) 15:25:06 #topic Open Discussion 15:25:11 Anything to discuss not on the agenda? 15:26:09 i've got nothing right now 15:26:17 oh! 15:26:47 Last call for: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/954612 15:28:35 And we can close out the meeting then 15:28:43 nope, one more 15:28:46 Who is chairing next week? 15:28:58 Do we have a volunteer? 15:29:00 I can 15:29:06 sgtm, 15:29:14 #action TheJulia to emcee the next meeting 15:29:18 Thanks all, meeting over o/ 15:29:19 #endmeeting