16:00:39 <TheJulia> #startmeeting ironic_bfv 16:00:40 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jul 6 16:00:39 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is TheJulia. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:41 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:44 <TheJulia> o/ 16:00:44 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ironic_bfv' 16:01:03 <phuongnh> o/ 16:01:08 <hshiina> o/ 16:01:49 <mjturek> o/ 16:01:51 <tiendc> o/ 16:02:03 <TheJulia> Our agenda this week can be found on the wiki 16:02:28 <TheJulia> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic-BFV#Agenda 16:02:48 <TheJulia> #topic Announcements/Reminders 16:03:28 <TheJulia> First off, the Volume connection information API patch landed earlier this week. 16:03:39 <TheJulia> translation: \o/ 16:03:42 <mjturek> \o/ 16:03:45 <hshiina> \o/ 16:03:51 <mjturek> that patch was a beast 16:04:05 <TheJulia> Indeed 16:04:37 <TheJulia> Secondly, the client library freeze is approaching quickly, and reviews on openstack/python-ironicclient would be greatly appreciated. 16:04:50 <TheJulia> Does anyone have any announcements or reminders to bring up? 16:06:44 <TheJulia> I guess not :) 16:06:49 <TheJulia> Moving on! 16:07:04 <TheJulia> #topic Current Status 16:07:56 <TheJulia> I updated our status etherpad a couple of hours ago. 16:07:57 <TheJulia> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Ironic-BFV 16:08:42 <TheJulia> As mentioned earlier, the volume connection API patch has landed. Effectively allowing us to begin to review the client patches and proceed with the remaining in-tree patches. 16:09:33 <TheJulia> mjturek: is 478690 ready for review? 16:09:55 <mjturek> TheJulia: yep tests are added 16:10:01 <TheJulia> Awesome 16:11:42 <TheJulia> hshiina: Regarding the nova patch, I've not heard back from walter. I think your reply is sufficient, and that we may want to just rebase the patch or update the commit message or something. 16:12:18 <hshiina> TheJulia: sure, i will rebase it. 16:12:37 <TheJulia> hshiina: content in the patch needs to change, even if just slightly. :) 16:12:59 <hshiina> TheJulia: i got it, thanks 16:13:00 <TheJulia> Does anyone have anything else to report status wise? 16:16:12 * TheJulia guesses no 16:16:40 <TheJulia> Moving on! 16:16:43 <TheJulia> #topic Planning/Priorities 16:17:24 <mjturek> top priority is ironicclient right? 16:17:27 <TheJulia> I think the priorities are clear at this time, that we mainly just need reviews. 16:17:33 <TheJulia> I believe so 16:18:04 <hshiina> yes, ironicclient 16:18:51 <TheJulia> #info Priority right now is python-ironicclient reviews. 16:19:40 <TheJulia> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1526231+project:openstack/python-ironicclient 16:19:57 <TheJulia> Does anyone have anything else to raise regarding priorities or planning at this time? 16:21:04 <hshiina> i have nothing 16:21:33 <mjturek> I'm good 16:21:36 <TheJulia> Excellent, Well I guess we can move on then. 16:21:48 <TheJulia> #topic Discussion 16:21:54 * TheJulia passes the microphone to mjturek 16:22:20 * mjturek grabs link 16:22:34 <mjturek> had a question about a review i got 16:22:38 <mjturek> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472856/ 16:23:00 <mjturek> shivanand was saying that we should be enforcing the netboot option 16:23:06 <mjturek> but I wasn't sure if that 16:23:14 <mjturek> is done anywhere else 16:23:27 <mjturek> should we be enforcing any boot option? 16:23:55 <TheJulia> I personally don't think so, because the presence of the config overrides and we are then relying upon the storage module 16:24:32 <mjturek> so the boot_option is essentially ignored? 16:24:42 <TheJulia> An example would be if it is a whole disk image, we don't need to pass the option, and it is the default deployment mode from what I understand at this point 16:25:01 <TheJulia> I think so, yes. 16:25:04 <mjturek> that makes sense 16:25:13 <mjturek> cool, I'll respond soon 16:25:17 <mjturek> thanks TheJulia 16:26:06 * mjturek is good :) 16:26:07 <TheJulia> I kind of feel like setting it just becomes an excess option that has to be known, especially if someone is doing to directly with ironic and it is not being initiated by nova. 16:26:18 <TheJulia> Any objections? 16:26:47 <mjturek> right if we don't use it, and it doesn't effect deployment, enforcing it is just a nuisance to the user 16:28:33 <TheJulia> I could see it getting slightly more complex, for dedicated hardware HBAs, but we have already defined that at a high level for those boot cases. 16:28:48 <TheJulia> Anyway, I think we are good to move on 16:29:18 <TheJulia> #topic Open Discussion 16:29:31 <TheJulia> Anyone have anything to discuss? 16:31:21 <TheJulia> I guess not, and we can call it a shortish meeting :) 16:31:46 <mjturek> thanks everybody :) 16:31:54 <hshiina> thanks 16:31:54 <TheJulia> Thanks everyone! 16:31:59 <tiendc> thanks 16:32:04 <TheJulia> #endmeeting