16:01:15 #startmeeting ironic_neutron 16:01:16 Meeting started Mon Apr 18 16:01:15 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:20 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic_neutron' 16:01:25 o/ 16:01:56 #topic: Agenda 16:01:57 \o 16:02:02 #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic-neutron#Meeting_April_18.2C_2016 16:02:14 #topic: Announcements 16:02:47 Today is Uncle Sam's day - be sure to remember to mail your returns 16:03:07 Next week is Summit - so, no meeting 16:03:25 Do we want to have meeting Monday after summit? 16:03:47 considering folks will be traveling - I propose we cancel that meeting as well 16:04:31 any objection? 16:04:40 No objections here 16:05:25 anybody else? 16:05:46 Summit session for Ironic + Neutron 16:06:30 I tried to get one on the neutron side, but, was not able to 16:06:47 ah thats a shame :( 16:06:47 so we have Tuesday's session - led by jroll 16:07:14 yep 16:07:18 sambetts : neutron is the largest project in OpenStack - hence, too many initiatives - so, gets very hard 16:07:28 sambetts: we need to flesh out the etherpad this week, the sooner the better - want to help me? :) 16:07:37 yeah, sure 16:07:39 and there is Friday sessions 16:08:28 I spoke with armax - we are going to advertise Tuesday session in neutron core meeting today to make sure we critical mass in Tuesday's session 16:08:33 from Neutron side 16:08:54 Great! 16:09:08 the more people we get involved the better 16:09:27 Also, we can use Friday PM session 16:09:35 * sambetts leaves Friday 16:10:25 oh 16:10:35 I also leave friday afternoon 16:11:00 although Flight is 6pm so depending on how long to Airport I'll have to get going mid afternoon 16:11:02 jroll : perhaps Friday AM then - depending upon how Tuesday's session goes 16:11:44 Sukhdev: I always assume I'll have no free time and only half a brain by friday :P 16:11:46 sambetts : you are good if your flight is at 6pm :-) 16:11:58 but sure, folks should get together and chat about it 16:12:55 Not sure what else is planned, I know Friday in tokyo we had some ok conversations AM 16:13:10 jroll : I thinking if we have to iron out any details or specifics, it is always best to so that way 16:13:15 yep 16:13:26 I just can't promise I'll be there 16:13:34 or rather, be in that conversation 16:13:56 jroll : we can always fill you in later 16:14:05 yep 16:14:35 or get your favourite beer to attract you into the session :-) 16:17:15 jroll : do you have etherpad for Tuesday's session? 16:17:16 Sukhdev: yep, one sec 16:17:19 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-baremetal-networking 16:17:19 oh it is empty :-) 16:17:30 yeah, exactly :) 16:17:41 I was thinking about sharing it in today's neutron core meeting - to get people heads up :-) 16:18:27 I will dump sambetts's spec in there 16:18:28 I mean, you can share the link 16:18:43 oh sam is dumping things now 16:19:07 I see it :-) 16:19:26 sambetts : perfect - thanks 16:19:39 This helps 16:20:12 I am not sure neutron folks are aware of this session - e.g. armax did not know about it - I brought it to his attention last Friday 16:20:48 This will help - so that we can get some of the critical folks 16:21:00 Sukhdev: actually I did, but I appreciated the reminder ;) 16:21:16 armax : cool - 16:22:02 armax : I will add this link to the neutron core meeting agenda 16:22:24 Sukhdev: thanks 16:22:38 Sukhdev: I was about to, but if you beat me to it, I won’t mind 16:23:20 armax : thanks 16:24:05 I see sambetts is at it :-) 16:24:25 sambetts : I am watching as you are writing - looking good 16:24:44 Trying to workout what else to add 16:25:46 sambetts : just try to be as clear as possible in terms of BM requirements 16:26:04 sambetts : most of the people know about VM requirements - 16:26:35 this way they can see the similarities and differences 16:26:45 this session has nothing to do with VMs 16:27:01 we want to discuss bare metal networking 16:27:12 the stuff sam's spec proposes, and what we want to do beyond that 16:27:46 jroll : right, we do not need to talk about the VM requirements - we only need to specify BM requirements - folks already know about VM requiremets 16:28:02 the ultimate goal being to decouple the neutron networking from the physical networking 16:28:43 sure, I just don't want this session to be "vlans + baremetal 16:28:45 " 16:29:06 I want it to be more general 16:29:47 the ideal goal is the have a neutron API which works for anyone - virtual/logical and physical devices 16:31:05 Sukhdev: VPC is mode 4 like MLAG 16:31:58 sambetts : it's been more than 5 years for me when I head VPC :-) 16:32:15 getting foggy:-) 16:32:37 Sukhdev: :) I'm still learning 16:32:45 so VPC = MLAG 16:33:17 I believe they are equivolent, from the nodes perspective, just different in the switches 16:33:25 LAG to one switch MLAG to multiple 16:33:50 yup 16:34:07 and VPC puts extra cables between the switches to do fancy things ya? 16:34:42 there is some crazy stuff in there (that i'm still working out) yeah 16:35:43 Many years ago we used to refer to the Service links as VPC links - when DNS nodes connect to the switches 16:36:20 do we want to continue the meeting or just work on the etherpad? 16:36:54 jroll : I think we are done with the meeting - 16:37:15 rest of the agenda is same, meaning, there is nothing really to discuss :-):-) 16:37:32 awesome 16:37:47 We can finish the meeting - unless somebody has anything they want to bring up? 16:38:09 I'm good 16:38:14 Nothing from me its just filling out the etherpad 16:38:16 I will add on to this etherpad today or tomorrow 16:39:29 sambetts : third requirement - do you mean neutron networks or neutron physical networks ? 16:40:07 neutron physical networks, because BM plugs directly into physnets right 16:40:32 not necessarily 16:41:25 Sukhdev: here's an example scenario that would solve: 16:41:50 1x 1g NIC, 2x 10g NIC, I want network X on a bond on the 10g links, and network Y on the 1g links 16:43:19 jroll : good example - how about expanding it further - 16:43:40 Sukhdev: such as? 16:43:51 I want to add network Z on 1g links as well 16:44:11 i.e. multiple networks on one physical port 16:44:14 yep 16:44:22 done 16:45:03 cool - I see it 16:54:06 jroll sambetts and others - I am going to end the meeting - unless you want me to keep it open 16:54:18 Sukhdev: I'm good 16:54:31 Nothing else from me as far as I'm aware 16:55:01 hi. we tested the patches with our ml2 driver. it worked well. 16:55:23 i'd like to report it. 16:55:29 hshiina : good to hear that 16:55:45 hshiina: Thanks for sharing this information - more testing the better 16:56:10 hshiina : can you introduce yourself and which ML2 driver did you use? 16:56:41 i'm working for fujitsu. we're developping networking-fujitsu driver. 16:56:57 do you know yushiro? 16:57:16 hshiina : yes, I met him in Tokyo 16:57:33 he is a main developer of our driver. 16:57:52 hshiina : good to know - thanks for sharing this informaiton 16:58:06 thanks. 16:58:16 OK folks, we are done with the meeting 16:58:28 Thanks for attending 16:58:32 #endmeeting