16:00:43 #startmeeting ironic_neutron 16:00:43 Meeting started Mon Sep 12 16:00:43 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:44 o/ 16:00:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:48 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic_neutron' 16:01:02 o/ 16:01:15 do we have usual crowd for this meeting? 16:01:16 o/ 16:01:38 Not sure if jroll is around for this one 16:01:53 #topic: Agenda 16:01:59 sambetts : thanks 16:02:01 I'm in another meeting but keeping an eye here 16:02:12 jroll : cool - thanks 16:02:19 #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic-neutron#Meeting_September_12.2C_2016 16:02:44 #topic: Announcements 16:03:13 I do not have any specific one - other than that we are approaching close to the release time 16:03:47 does anyone know when is the cutoff for RC for Ironic? 16:04:16 we don't have RC in the same way as other projects, jroll can explain a bit better than I 16:04:32 yeah, not sure when we'll release yet 16:04:38 probably next week, maybe week after 16:04:59 cool - so, there is still some time 16:05:19 #topic: Security Groups - 16:05:37 link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361451 16:05:45 This one is ready to go 16:06:07 jroll - will this make it? considering we have time ? 16:06:48 it's pretty late, and doesn't have associated CI 16:07:01 but I can't decide on my own, we'll need to see what the ironic team things 16:07:03 thinks 16:07:24 jroll : this does not really require CI 16:07:32 I disagree :) 16:07:38 we should test this in the multitenant CI probably 16:07:59 I'm sure we're probably doing something in there to work around this right now already 16:08:10 I'm not worried about landing it without CI, more about being this late without it 16:08:27 if this breaks, it breaks very hard :) 16:08:53 jroll : I see - makes sense 16:08:59 right now I'm -0.5 on landing this for newton, but I'll have to check with the rest of the team 16:09:53 #topic Port Groups 16:10:05 I noticed those patches did not make either 16:10:23 yeah :( 16:10:35 do we have CI for those? 16:10:53 Any chance they will make it? 16:10:55 not that I'm aware of 16:11:00 even if we did, it's too much too late 16:11:13 I saw the IRC chat on those :-) 16:13:15 So, looks like from the networking point of view, every thing is sealed for Newton - except 50% chance for Security Groups 16:15:08 sambetts : any update on VxLan aware servers? 16:16:02 Sukhdev, jroll: I have some thought in setupping CI for portgroups, OVS support lacp so theoretically it should be possible 16:16:19 yeah agree 16:16:26 right 16:16:27 The trunk APIs etc have merged into Neutron now, but they havn't got all the documentation and things ready yet, and they are still working on the linux bridge/example implementations for it, so we should be able to get up and running with it next cycle 16:17:48 sambetts : yup - I saw the patches - looks like next cycle we should be good 16:18:21 I also want to get the attach/detach API spec/code merged as a platform for developing the V(x)LAN aware BM stuff in Ironic instead of in Nova 16:19:10 sambetts : this one - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327046/ 16:19:35 I've updated the Agenda with all the POC code for getting that too work, it needs changes in Nova, ironicclient and Ironic itself 16:19:56 Sukhdev: yup thats the Ironic part of the puzzle 16:20:59 Looks like we will have good chunk of work in next cycle as well :-) 16:21:25 vsaienko : I want to pick up a tip or two from you about adding Security Groups to CI as well 16:22:08 Sukhdev: it is also possible, ovs supports filtering 16:22:09 vsaienko : SG is ready to go, but, according to jroll, it is missing CI part - which I am not much familiar with 16:22:10 Yup :) other places we might need to contribute include cloud-init to support the full network-data.json for configuring bonding and VLANs for portgroups and VLAN aware BM 16:22:44 again, I'm fine landing SG without CI, just not this late in the cycle 16:22:54 and with CI coming behind it 16:23:15 jroll : oh - I got it - thanks for clarifying 16:23:42 sambetts : +1 16:24:10 sambetts: having bond support ind cloud-init would be super useful! 16:24:20 vsaienko : if you have a pointer or two about CI which you could send my way, I could look into this 16:25:42 Sukhdev: half of work is done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333362/ I need to add ovs support only. And another part is to have tempest test that would test it 16:26:12 #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327046/ 16:26:21 Sukhdev: did you get on OK trying out the inspector LLDP part? Unfortunatly my Neutron patches to get inspector using the neutron DHCP didn't go anywhere again this cycle, perhaps I can use your leverage on the Neutron side next cycle to get those in too? 16:27:04 Sukhdev: I will check with my team, and try to find volunteer for tempest tests. and in background add ovs support to networking-generic-switch 16:27:43 sambetts : I can work with you next cycle - armax and I spoke about it - he assigned the task to me to work with you to get this done. I kind of dropped the ball - so, my bad 16:27:58 sambetts : I will work with you to get this done in neutron side 16:28:27 Sukhdev: Awesome :D I was quite busy my end this cycle so didn't push that hard either, thanks 16:28:32 vsaienko : thanks a ton for this - I will look at the patch that you sent me 16:30:32 Anything else on this? 16:30:57 #topic Open Discussion 16:31:18 Anybody wants to discuss anything? 16:32:06 Be sure to watch big game tonight - season opener for 49ers vs. Rams 16:32:53 armax, kevinbenton and I were suppose to go to Levi to watch it tonight - plan got changed 16:33:24 be sure to try to pick me from the crowd on the TV :-):-) 16:33:34 folks, just having fun :-) 16:34:04 If we have nothing else, lets wrap it up 16:34:08 Have an awesome time man! 16:34:24 sambetts : I intend to - thanks 16:34:49 Thanks folks 16:34:57 thanks again :) 16:35:04 bye 16:35:11 #endmeeting