16:06:26 #startmeeting ironic_neutron 16:06:27 Meeting started Mon Dec 19 16:06:26 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sukhdev_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:06:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:06:30 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic_neutron' 16:06:44 Good morning everybody 16:06:59 Sorry for late start because of technical difficulties 16:07:06 #topic: Agenda 16:07:24 #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic-neutron#Meeting_December_19.2C_2016 16:07:31 * jroll notes sam is out today 16:07:57 hmm... probably in holiday spirit already :-) 16:08:08 #topic: Announcements 16:08:21 o/ 16:08:27 talking about the holidays - we are heading into holidays 16:08:54 Next week is Christmas week and following is new year day/eve 16:09:19 Hence, we will skip meetings for next two weeks 16:09:35 Next meeting on 9th Jan 16:09:48 Please take a note of this - hope everybody is OK with that 16:10:26 * jroll won't be here anyway 16:10:50 * Sukhdev_ will not be here either 16:11:11 with sambetts out, we may zoom through the agenda real quick 16:11:35 yep 16:11:48 Another announcement is that Security Group feature is now complete 16:11:56 \o/ 16:12:07 unless somebody feels we need something more for this 16:12:15 nah I think we're good to go 16:12:24 CI testing would be cool, eventually 16:12:59 I tested it manually and seems to work just fine 16:13:13 manually doesn't help keep it from breaking later :) 16:13:59 jroll : If somebody can give me pointers to the CI part (not familiar) I can take a crack at it 16:14:33 Sukhdev_: I'm not sure right this second how we would want to do it 16:15:11 jroll : we can discuss it in the next meeting - when everybody is here and the year will be new :-) 16:15:44 yep 16:15:46 Moving right along - 16:15:54 #topic: Port Groups 16:16:12 This looks like there - I see two patches in merge conflict 16:16:17 #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1618754 16:16:44 on the ironic side everything is ready I think 16:17:11 there is a patch for osc support left https://review.openstack.org/362130 16:17:19 nice! 16:17:35 very good 16:17:37 and I'll try to add a mode/properties fields to client too today/tomorrow, that should be easy 16:17:47 then we're ready to do the nova side 16:18:35 thank vdrok 16:18:38 thanks 16:19:01 jroll: do we also need a release of client so that nova sees the changes? or it installs client from master? 16:19:10 vdrok: yes, we will 16:19:14 which is easy :) 16:19:15 yup, ok 16:19:32 though releases aren't happening next week (this week is fine) 16:19:52 ok, then I'll prioritize finishing client :) 16:20:02 cool, thanks! 16:20:12 you can do weird depends-on stuff to test the nova bits, though 16:20:28 we also said nova should wait for the attach/detach stuff, because it simplifies it so much 16:20:30 with install_libs_from_git things> 16:20:31 ? 16:20:43 yep 16:21:20 something like LIBS_FROM_GIT+=',ironic-lib' and IRONIC_LIB_BRANCH=master or so 16:21:26 don't remember the exact details 16:22:08 yeah, I've done that once I think 16:22:46 cool 16:22:53 * jroll thinks we're done with this section 16:23:03 good - thanks 16:23:28 #topic: Interface attach API 16:24:00 vsaienko has pushed some updates. basically that's mostly ok 16:24:03 I see updated patches this morning - so looks like sambetts is working on these 16:24:05 some small things left 16:24:07 #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:+bug/1582188 16:24:44 vsaienko is working on it while sam is out 16:25:20 oh - did not see who pushed the patch :-) 16:25:35 but yeah, they're making progress 16:25:42 this is progressing well 16:26:28 neither of them is here to discuss anything here 16:27:12 #topic: VLAN Aware Servers 16:27:32 nothing since dec 7, but it's blocked on the rest anyway 16:27:55 we can review the spec though - I did last week - looks good 16:28:09 I added few comments - but, this is generally good to go 16:28:44 there were some additional comments which needs to be addressed - based upon the discussion here in the previous meeting 16:29:08 We can pick it up when everybody is back 16:29:48 I have nothing else on the agenda 16:29:56 #topic: Open Discussion 16:30:06 anything to cover? 16:30:08 so I have a thing here 16:30:19 this meeting has basically become a status report 16:30:22 (which is great!) 16:30:34 I'm wondering if we can just roll it into the general ironic meeting 16:30:46 report in the subteam status reports, put a topic on the agenda if it needs discussion 16:31:36 any thoughts on that? 16:31:53 you are correct - with most of the things in place, that is not a bad idea 16:32:20 we can always have ad-hoc meetings on things to dig deeper if needed, too 16:32:36 +1 16:32:52 anyone else have opinions? 16:33:16 otherwise Sukhdev_ can email the mailing list about it and I'm happy to do the patch to the irc meetings repo 16:33:26 (I can do the email, too, if that makes Sukhdev_'s life easier) 16:34:01 jroll : I can send out the email - no worries 16:34:07 I can push the patch as well 16:34:15 even better! 16:34:26 I'll update the main ironic meeting wiki 16:34:43 The question is - should we have the last meeting on Jan 9 or kill it? 16:34:59 I'm fine either way 16:35:18 prefer the latter but don't have strong objections to one more 16:36:12 Lets just kill it 16:36:36 sounds good to me 16:36:43 I have some free cycles later this week and next - I will send the email and push the patch 16:37:02 awesome, thanks Sukhdev_ :) 16:37:18 Anything else? 16:37:26 Anybody ? 16:37:30 * jroll has nothing 16:37:42 looks like we are done 16:37:54 Thanks everybody 16:37:57 #endmeeting