17:00:29 #startmeeting ironic_qa 17:00:29 Meeting started Wed Dec 16 17:00:29 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jlvillal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:31 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:33 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic_qa' 17:00:42 o/ 17:00:43 heyo \o 17:00:45 o/ 17:00:45 Hello everyone 17:00:45 <[1]cdearborn> \o 17:00:47 \o 17:00:51 o/ 17:00:57 yea, jlvillal is back :) 17:01:02 o/ 17:01:04 Hi all 17:01:08 hi 17:01:15 \o 17:01:16 So I'm a bit rusty at this... 17:01:32 #topic Announcements 17:01:38 o/ 17:01:47 I don't have any announcements. Does anyone have anything to announce? 17:02:07 I'll take that as a no. 17:02:18 #topic Grenade testing 17:02:18 just fyi, we (powerkvm) are planning on starting comments soon 17:02:18 OneView driver CI is now able to test deployment workflow 17:02:34 #undo 17:02:35 Removing item from minutes: 17:02:57 yep, maurosr and I have been debugging the tempest runs and we're very close to having a successful run, pretty exciting 17:03:01 * jroll has announcements 17:03:03 jlvillal, let us slow typists have a chance :) 17:03:14 Remind me how to make a note... 17:03:38 we're now running ironic changes via a devstack plugin, soon the same for grenade. that work is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open++branch:master+topic:ironic-devstack-plugin,n,z 17:03:42 err. 17:03:46 #info we're now running ironic changes via a devstack plugin, soon the same for grenade. that work is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open++branch:master+topic:ironic-devstack-plugin,n,z 17:04:16 another announcement: the gate's in terrible shape. we've bumped the timeout to 600 to hopefully mitigate in the meantime 17:04:20 yeah I have some patches (necessary to power systems) on devstack that I need to re-work to fit on this new format 17:04:39 #info we're now running ironic changes via a devstack plugin, soon the same for grenade. that work is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open++branch:master+topic:ironic-devstack-plugin,n,z 17:04:52 Hmmm. I expected a notification about that. 17:04:52 maurosr: the code in the devstack plugin is almost identical, should be easy to move 17:04:59 nah, no notifications 17:05:05 Okay. 17:05:18 nice! 17:05:35 #info powerkvm are planning on starting to make comments soon 17:05:43 o/ 17:05:46 jroll: very cool 17:05:59 #info OneView driver CI is now able to test deployment workflow 17:06:00 oh, cool, thanks jlvillal 17:06:21 Any other announcements? 17:06:22 here come the CI systems :) 17:06:48 In 3 17:06:50 2 17:06:53 1 17:06:59 #topic Grenade testing 17:07:21 So I have not worked on it for about 5 weeks :( 17:07:39 though I think that moving devstack to become a plugin should make the work easier. 17:07:51 o/ 17:08:05 I'm trying to decide which has higher priority. functional testing work or grenade testing. I'm leaning towards grenade. 17:08:12 jroll, Would love your thoughts. 17:08:23 jlvillal: grenade, for sure 17:08:34 jlvillal: also, you saw we're doing the grenade plugin thing, right? 17:08:38 so should be easier to iterate on 17:08:52 but I'd love to be able to assert we can do online upgrades - grenade is the missing piece there 17:08:56 #info jlvillal to focus on getting grenade jobs working first, and then functional testing. 17:09:10 jroll, Yep I saw the patch. Thanks for that. 17:09:21 Okay moving on... 17:09:28 #info functional testing 17:09:35 #topic functional testing 17:09:47 * jlvillal should have undone that. Oh well... 17:10:16 #info Once grenade work is done jlvillal will start again on functional testing. But if other people would like to work on it, that would be great. 17:10:34 So if anyone is interested in working on functional testing that would be wonderful. 17:10:53 I'll take a look 17:10:57 I think vdrok was doing some stuff that looked somewhat related... 17:11:08 but will make slow progress due to holidays 17:11:09 Or at least vdrok had good ideas on bringing up the services. 17:11:12 jlvillal: I'd like to lend a hand as well 17:11:24 mjturek1, krtaylor great 17:11:55 #info WIP patch for functional testing: https://review.openstack.org/235612 17:11:59 jlvillal, nope, I was not looking into it much yet, but will try to some time this week 17:12:03 krtaylor, mjturek1 ^^^ 17:12:26 vdrok, I think you had made a good comment in my review. So I thought vdrok knows about functional testing :) 17:12:34 :) 17:12:42 * jlvillal jumped for joy 17:12:47 jvillal: thanks!! 17:12:51 Anything else? 17:12:59 eh, it does not open, and I don't remember my comment :) 17:13:27 vdrok, Yeah I think Gerrit maybe has an issue? 17:13:45 Moving on ... 17:14:03 #topic 3rd Party CI 17:14:17 I'll open the floor for comments. 17:14:42 Is the iLO test still failing? 17:14:57 spec merged, thanks to jroll and all that contributed! 17:14:57 jlvillal, no, it's upgrading, there was a notice ~10 mins ago 17:15:16 yeah, gerrit is down for ~4 hours 17:15:36 #info 3rd party CI spec was merged. Thanks krtaylor and everyone else involved. 17:15:36 jlvillal, I think iLO still failing yes, at least ased on the last votes I saw from it 17:16:11 #info iLO CI is currently voting. But all votes are failure at this point. Work is in progress to fix it. 17:16:15 lucasagomes, Thanks 17:16:26 Any other 3rd party CI? 17:16:35 Oneview are you good with the announcement before? 17:17:00 yep, we are still in check experimentl 17:17:10 sinval, thanks 17:17:13 and soon we'll be in every patch 17:17:22 If nothing else we can move on. 17:17:35 just a note 17:17:49 "voting" is typically used to mean "a -1 blocks a patch from merging" 17:18:07 whereas "commenting" is meant as "submits a comment with a +1 or -1" 17:18:23 let's try to use the right word to keep things straight :) 17:18:25 undo 17:18:29 #undo 17:18:30 Removing item from minutes: 17:19:04 #info iLO CI is currently commenting. But all comments are failure at this point. Work is in progress to fix it. 17:19:15 :) 17:19:16 jroll, Thanks 17:19:27 Okay moving on 17:19:33 #topic General QA topics 17:19:43 Anyone have anything to discuss here? 17:20:08 * jlvillal is not sure if gate failures fall into this category 17:20:46 #info Gate has had many job failures recently. Due to timeout being exceeded. Patch was put in to extend timeout to 600 seconds. 17:20:53 I put it in announcements too because holy cow 17:20:55 it's so bad 17:21:07 yeah, it's failing a lot 17:21:31 #info A patch is proposed to capture all of the 'baremetal' logs so that we have better insight into failures. https://review.openstack.org/257987 17:21:34 we tried a couple of things to mitigate it, ipxe, changing the driver to virtio... but nothing worked effectively 17:21:51 but I still think it would be good to get that stuff in regardless, every little helps 17:21:57 Thanks jroll lucasagomes 17:22:06 Anything else before we have open discussion? 17:22:23 Okay moving on then. 17:22:30 #topic Open Discussion 17:22:33 3rd 17:23:05 rajinir, ??? 17:23:25 Anyone have anything? 17:23:59 Ending meeting in 5 17:24:00 not sure, unless people wants to try to brainstorm what could possible making the gate so slow to timeout 17:24:16 isn't "general qa discussion" the same as "open discussion" in a qa meeting? :P 17:24:21 tho we don't have much data... 17:24:25 or can I talk about beer now 17:24:34 os Star Wars... it's coming! 17:24:37 or* 17:24:37 lucasagomes, I'm not sure. I think your patch is probably going to help figure it out. 17:24:46 jlvillal, yeah I hope so 17:25:09 lucasagomes, At the moment it doesn't seem like we have the data to understand why. 17:25:20 yeah 17:25:21 But if people have some ideas that would be great! 17:25:26 we can work with theories 17:26:08 Okay. I think we are done for this meeting. 17:26:15 Thanks everyone for attending! 17:26:18 yeah, I think we needs more datas 17:26:23 thanks for hosting jlvillal :) 17:26:37 thanks 17:26:37 #info No meetings for next two weeks 17:26:55 #info Next meeting 6-Jan-2015 17:27:03 Thanks all. Ciao 17:27:10 thanks! 17:27:10 #endmeeting