17:00:05 <jlvillal> #startmeeting ironic_qa
17:00:12 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Apr 20 17:00:05 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jlvillal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:13 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:15 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ironic_qa'
17:00:18 <jlvillal> Hello everyone
17:00:19 <mjturek> o/
17:00:42 <mjturek> hey jlvillal
17:00:42 <kcalman> 0/
17:00:47 <kcalman> 0/
17:00:51 <jlvillal> As always the agenda is at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic-QA
17:00:52 <kcalman> o/
17:00:57 <sambetts> o/ hey hey
17:01:14 <jlvillal> You may have noticed if you look at the agenda that we don't have a meeting next week
17:01:16 <krtaylor> o/
17:01:19 <jlvillal> #topic Announcements
17:01:28 <jlvillal> #info No meeting on 27-Apr-2016
17:01:38 <watanabe_isao> o/
17:01:53 <jlvillal> That is the only announcement I have.
17:01:57 <jlvillal> Anything else form anyone?
17:02:04 <watanabe_isao> jlvillal, may I
17:02:19 <jlvillal> watanabe_isao: If you have an announcement, then yes :)
17:02:27 <watanabe_isao> iRMC CI is about to get ready.
17:02:38 <watanabe_isao> Our test using agent_irmc driver succeed in ci-sandbox.
17:02:42 <krtaylor> nice
17:02:46 <watanabe_isao> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267924/
17:02:52 <jlvillal> And what is "iRMC", for thos of us who don't know
17:02:58 <jlvillal> s/thos/those/
17:03:05 <watanabe_isao> If you have a look at the log, you will find that the test includes baremetal boot up and tempest barematal api tests in it.
17:03:13 <watanabe_isao> We will maintenance for a little bit more, and target the CI to Ironic around the summit.
17:03:18 <watanabe_isao> thank you
17:03:30 <rajinir> o/
17:03:34 <jlvillal> watanabe_isao: What is iRMC?
17:04:29 <rpioso> \o
17:04:33 <jlvillal> watanabe_isao: ???
17:04:43 <watanabe_isao> jlvillal, it is the interface of fujitsu's server I think.
17:04:59 <watanabe_isao> jlvillal, sorry I need to check more.
17:05:19 <jlvillal> Oh. Sorry I thought you would know since you are announcing it.
17:05:28 <watanabe_isao> Remote Management Controller (iRMC)
17:05:38 <krtaylor> watanabe_isao, this is your page, right? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Fujitsu_iRMC_CI
17:05:49 <watanabe_isao> krtaylor, yes.
17:06:10 <krtaylor> watanabe_isao, thanks, I am trying to keep all that info up to date
17:06:22 <jlvillal> #info watanabe_isao Announced that Fujitsu's iRMC (Remote Management Controller) CI is almost ready. Tests are succeeding in the sandbox. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267924/
17:06:37 <jlvillal> watanabe_isao: Announcement recorded :)
17:06:44 <jlvillal> Any other announcements?
17:06:48 <watanabe_isao> jlvillal, krtaylor thanks a lot.
17:06:55 <watanabe_isao> :)
17:06:59 <jlvillal> Okay moving on
17:07:03 <jlvillal> #topic Grenade testing
17:07:54 <jlvillal> I did not get much done this week :(  Been running into strange issues on one system where PyPi packages seem to get downloaded with the wrong MD5SUM.
17:08:18 <jlvillal> Have not troubleshooted that issue. But makes 1 of my 2 test systems not work.
17:09:00 <jlvillal> Not seeming to get consistent failures unfortunately. I seem to get different failures quite often.
17:09:26 <jlvillal> JayF has volunteered to help out and we plain to do a pair programming/debugging session to work on it.
17:09:46 <jlvillal> #info Debugging/troubleshooting continues on Grenade. No breakthroughs yet.
17:10:07 <jlvillal> Any questions?  Volunteers? :)
17:10:20 <jlvillal> If not, I'll move on.
17:10:36 <jlvillal> #topic Functional testing
17:10:47 <jlvillal> Anyone have any updates on this?
17:10:50 <jlvillal> I don't
17:11:29 <jlvillal> Okay moving on
17:11:42 <jlvillal> #topic 3rd Party CI (krtaylor)
17:11:52 <krtaylor> I don't have any comments, just getting ready for summit
17:11:53 <jlvillal> krtaylor: All yours. Let me know when your topic is done :)
17:12:22 <krtaylor> yeah, thats kinda it for me
17:12:29 <rajinir> Is there a session dedicated to this>
17:12:34 <jlvillal> krtaylor: Meeting hog!
17:12:37 <jlvillal> ;)
17:12:39 <krtaylor> lol
17:12:39 <sambetts> # info Cisco CIMC and UCSM CIs currently stable, plan to make UCSM CI voting in the next day or two
17:12:51 <jlvillal> No space sambetts in "#info"
17:12:55 <sambetts> #info Cisco CIMC and UCSM CIs currently stable, plan to make UCSM CI voting in the next day or two
17:12:59 <sambetts> every time...
17:13:08 <jlvillal> :)
17:13:31 <jlvillal> krtaylor: Is there a session dedicated to 3rd party CI?
17:13:52 <jlvillal> rajinir: Sessions are here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-summit
17:14:01 <jlvillal> I think the schedule is updated
17:14:24 <krtaylor> jlvillal, there is as a part of the gate
17:14:29 * krtaylor looking for the link
17:14:36 <jlvillal> It is on the etherpad
17:14:43 <rajinir> Thans
17:14:45 <rajinir> Thanks
17:14:53 <sambetts> Something I'd like to discuss is the expected turn over times for the CI, we seem to be keeping up with the demand for patches right now with up to the 3 tests running in paralell for each CI, tests are taking about ~1hr 30 to run
17:15:17 <jlvillal> #info Session: Wednesday 9:50 - 10:30 - Status and future of our gate - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-summit-gate
17:15:46 <jlvillal> sambetts: Sounds like something good to bring up in the session.
17:15:56 <sambetts> yeah totally :D
17:16:16 <jlvillal> I don't know a value that is expected. Probably the infra folks do.
17:16:23 <jlvillal> but session is a good place.
17:16:30 <jlvillal> Okay moving on if nothing else.
17:16:30 <krtaylor> sambetts, the expected time is 4 hours
17:16:41 <jlvillal> Or less, I assume
17:16:44 <krtaylor> 1.5 is considered a good turnaround
17:16:58 <krtaylor> yes 4 hrs is the upper limit
17:17:08 <sambetts> kl, as long as we keep up with the queue then we're doing good then
17:17:12 <krtaylor> but we are staging that in, or we should if thats not in the spec
17:17:18 <krtaylor> ye
17:17:21 <krtaylor> yes
17:17:54 <sambetts> I'd of course like to workout any devstack optimisations that could be done, because that is a huge chunk of the time it takes to run the tests
17:18:07 <jlvillal> #info 4 hours is maximum time a CI job should take. Shorter time is better. 1.5 hours would be considered a good turnaround time.
17:18:21 <jlvillal> Anything else?
17:18:48 <jlvillal> Okay moving on
17:18:55 <jlvillal> #topic Open Discussion / General QA
17:19:16 <jlvillal> The floor is open for topics
17:19:42 <jlvillal> I'll wait two minutes before ending the meeting.
17:19:57 <sambetts> nothing from me
17:20:04 <jlvillal> As a question, who here will be attending the Summit?
17:20:13 <jlvillal> I am scheduled to appear
17:20:43 <rajinir> Attending the summit +1
17:20:50 <sambetts> Yup
17:21:16 <jlvillal> I think krtaylor couldn't make it because of the travel budget :P
17:21:30 <watanabe_isao> jlvillal, I couldn't.
17:21:30 <jlvillal> The 20 mile drive and all...
17:21:38 <krtaylor> I'll be there!
17:21:45 <kcalman> +1
17:22:13 <jlvillal> Thanks. For those who can't make it, hopefully next time! And for those who can, hope to meet you in person :)
17:22:25 <jlvillal> So if nothing else I will end the meeting.
17:22:28 <rpioso> +1
17:22:39 <jlvillal> Bye all!
17:22:42 <jlvillal> #endmeeting