14:09:42 <zxiiro> #startmeeting jjb
14:09:43 <openstack> Meeting started Fri Aug 11 14:09:42 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is zxiiro. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:09:45 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:09:47 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'jjb'
14:09:55 <zxiiro> #chair electrofelix waynr
14:09:56 <openstack> Current chairs: electrofelix waynr zxiiro
14:10:04 <zxiiro> #topic General
14:10:21 <zxiiro> #info electrofelix says we should update meeting to state that we'll use dedicated channel
14:10:28 <zxiiro> electrofelix: you want to take action to  do that?
14:15:05 <electrofelix> will do
14:15:23 <zxiiro> #action electrofelix to update meeting details to state that we'll use #openstack-jjb for meetings
14:15:27 <zxiiro> #topic jjb-2.0
14:16:15 <zxiiro> #info Need to understand what is outstanding for a jjb 2.0 release.
14:16:38 <zxiiro> #info waynr's patch https://review.openstack.org/333076 has been replied to
14:17:04 <zxiiro> is there any action items on that patch? or just someone needs to review it?
14:17:48 <zxiiro> Also what other patches do we need to keep track of related to jjb 2.0 work?
14:18:17 <zxiiro> #info zxiiro asks if we want to move forward with the proposal in the set of patches from https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/jenkins-job-builder+branch:master+topic:2.0-config-format
14:18:18 <electrofelix> I'll look at reviewing that change so
14:18:22 <zxiiro> ok
14:18:39 <zxiiro> #action electrofelix to review waynr's patch https://review.openstack.org/333076
14:19:06 <zxiiro> electrofelix: any other patches I didn't list that we should be looking at to push 2.0 through?
14:19:19 <electrofelix> update to only pass the config namespace related to the object around
14:20:08 <ssbarnea> zxiiro: yes, very interested about 2.0 release
14:21:09 <zxiiro> electrofelix: ok do we have a patch or bug for that (or something we can link to?)
14:21:37 <zxiiro> #info electrofelix says only other change needed is a patch to pass only the config namespace related to object around
14:22:33 <electrofelix> no storyboard entry, only mentioned in the etherpad
14:22:54 <electrofelix> see https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/jjb_api_v2.0
14:24:03 <zxiiro> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/jjb_api_v2.0 EtherPad details on JJB 2.0 work
14:25:02 <zxiiro> electrofelix: Cool I assume you will be working on that patch?
14:26:15 <electrofelix> zxiiro: yes, set aside time around the meeting to start work on it properly
14:26:46 <zxiiro> Ok so I think there are 3 things to land then, waynr's YAMLParser patch, electrofelix's namespace-config patch and to decide whether or not we want to land the set of patches that changes the default config preference to newest version of plugin
14:26:57 <zxiiro> #action electrofelix to work on config namespace patch
14:27:11 <zxiiro> cool that's all I got
14:27:25 <zxiiro> anyone else want to raise anything? ssbarnea? waynr?
14:27:47 <electrofelix> zxiiro: I'm ok with landing to switch to the newest version of each plugin, just need a good way to start letting people know?
14:28:43 <ssbarnea> zxiiro: i don't have anything in particular, my only "desire" is to release v2 (tag + pypi) so we can start consuming it officially. I have being using v2 outside CI for 6+ months without real problems so I doubt it would introduce any regressions for us.
14:29:41 <zxiiro> electrofelix: release notes is probably the best place? and maybe docs?
14:30:20 <zxiiro> electrofelix: I'll action myself to take a stab at putting it in the docs somewhere
14:30:52 <zxiiro> #action zxiiro to propose a patch to document that plugin configuration in 2.0 will default to the latest release of the plugin rather than oldest supported.
14:31:10 <zxiiro> ssbarnea: sounds good
14:31:48 <zxiiro> #endmeeting