17:00:32 <cmurphy> #startmeeting keystone 17:00:33 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar 3 17:00:32 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is cmurphy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:34 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:37 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'keystone' 17:00:44 <vishakha> o/ 17:00:57 <cmurphy> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-weekly-meeting agenda 17:00:58 <gagehugo> o/ 17:01:00 <cmurphy> hello o/ 17:01:47 <knikolla> o/ 17:02:21 <knikolla> i'm double booked, but i'll keep an eye on the channel 17:03:25 <cmurphy> #topic Feature proposal freeze next week 17:03:37 <cmurphy> this snuck up quick 17:04:04 <cmurphy> it's been a slow cycle so I think the only thing we're expecing is federated attrs and expiring group membership 17:04:52 <cmurphy> we already closed the look on the rest of the immutable roles spec 17:05:02 <cmurphy> are there other things that i'm forgetting? 17:05:07 <cmurphy> closed the loop* 17:05:29 <knikolla> i'll be able to reserve my work days this week to finish those up (re: fed attrs, expiring group memberships) 17:06:04 <cmurphy> knikolla: awesome, is there anything we can help with? is there anything ready to review? 17:07:12 <knikolla> i'll ping if i need anything. i looked during the weekend at what code i had written, and was surprised to see it mostly done but not pushed. 17:07:25 <cmurphy> haha :) 17:08:22 <cmurphy> okay moving on 17:08:28 <cmurphy> #topic l1 duty rotation 17:08:48 <cmurphy> last on duty was gagehugo, gagehugo any interesting cases to discuss? 17:09:25 <gagehugo> not much tbh 17:09:49 <cmurphy> yeah i didn't see much come in 17:10:06 <cmurphy> i am up this week, knikolla can you take next? 17:10:13 <knikolla> sure 17:10:22 <cmurphy> cool 17:10:29 <cmurphy> #topic review requests 17:11:00 <cmurphy> one request from vishakha 17:11:04 <cmurphy> #link https://review.opendev.org/710734 17:11:12 <cmurphy> any others? 17:11:24 <vishakha> I needed some help over https://review.opendev.org/#/c/704271/ 17:11:39 <gagehugo> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684397/ 17:12:00 <vishakha> Its almost finished but I am not able to find the reason of the failure of scoped one test 17:12:44 <cmurphy> gagehugo: nice! 17:13:30 <cmurphy> vishakha: i can try to help later. have you gotten your keystone change to work while manually testing it? 17:16:14 <cmurphy> any other review requests? 17:16:17 <vishakha> cmurphy: I can see the "openstack_groups" at the service provider side in the shibboleth logs 17:19:05 <knikolla> have you been able to authenticate yourself with openstack groups and the appropriate mappings, without using tempest 17:19:06 <knikolla> ? 17:19:50 <knikolla> if it appears in shibboleth logs, might be something wrong with the parsing 17:21:12 <cmurphy> fwiw i tried your keystone change and it seemed to work in my dev environment, if you can get it to work manually in your dev environment then it's just a matter of figuring out how to get the devstack plugin and tempest plugin to mimick your dev setup :) 17:21:58 <knikolla> also, it doesn't seem like you add a role to the group on that project 17:23:24 <vishakha> cmurphy: thanks. knikolla: I tried adding role to it but it was giving authentication error, also failing other test cases and I have no idea why till now 17:24:52 <knikolla> vishakha: hmmm... the scoping is definitely failing since the user doesn't have access to any projects. since it's failing at assertNotEmpty for projects. 17:25:01 <knikolla> not sure why that would break the others though. 17:26:06 <vishakha> knikolla: I am trying to find the reason. 17:27:53 <knikolla> i'll look into the failures of the prior patchsets later tonight 17:28:03 <vishakha> knikolla: Thanks 17:28:13 <cmurphy> thanks knikolla vishakha 17:28:28 <cmurphy> #topic open floor 17:28:39 <cmurphy> any other business? 17:28:53 <knikolla> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709892/ 17:28:54 <vishakha> cmurphy: I wanted some attention on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/697444/ 17:29:06 <knikolla> do we have any more backports or should be accept going into rocky EM? 17:31:20 <cmurphy> knikolla: i think the last round of releases caught most of them but i haven't checked thoroughly, do you know of any open stable/* backports straggling that we should focus on? 17:32:14 <cmurphy> vishakha: i hadn't seen amotoki's response yet, will review and follow up, thanks 17:32:36 <knikolla> cmurphy: there's only this. but it's pretty old https://review.opendev.org/#/c/683304/ 17:34:31 <cmurphy> knikolla: the followup for that is https://review.opendev.org/710511 which i still need to review, will do that today and maybe we can get that set of patches backported through to rocky this week 17:35:15 <knikolla> are they priority? 17:35:50 <cmurphy> not really imo, i'd be okay with moving rocky to EM and merging them after 17:36:08 <cmurphy> depends on how antsy the release team is to get this done 17:36:12 <knikolla> ++ 17:36:29 <knikolla> honestly, i just wanna transition to EM before stable/rocky gate breaks again 17:36:37 <cmurphy> haha 17:36:39 <cmurphy> fair 17:37:14 <cmurphy> if you want to ack that release proposal now that's fine with me 17:37:54 <knikolla> ok, will do that 17:38:15 <cmurphy> cool 17:38:20 <cmurphy> anything else? 17:38:25 <knikolla> done 17:38:33 <knikolla> gotta run now, bye everyone! 17:39:02 <cmurphy> thanks knikolla 17:40:05 <cmurphy> i'll close the meeting too, thanks everyone 17:40:08 <cmurphy> #endmeeting