17:00:32 <cmurphy> #startmeeting keystone
17:00:33 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar  3 17:00:32 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is cmurphy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:34 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:37 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'keystone'
17:00:44 <vishakha> o/
17:00:57 <cmurphy> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-weekly-meeting agenda
17:00:58 <gagehugo> o/
17:01:00 <cmurphy> hello o/
17:01:47 <knikolla> o/
17:02:21 <knikolla> i'm double booked, but i'll keep an eye on the channel
17:03:25 <cmurphy> #topic Feature proposal freeze next week
17:03:37 <cmurphy> this snuck up quick
17:04:04 <cmurphy> it's been a slow cycle so I think the only thing we're expecing is federated attrs and expiring group membership
17:04:52 <cmurphy> we already closed the look on the rest of the immutable roles spec
17:05:02 <cmurphy> are there other things that i'm forgetting?
17:05:07 <cmurphy> closed the loop*
17:05:29 <knikolla> i'll be able to reserve my work days this week to finish those up (re: fed attrs, expiring group memberships)
17:06:04 <cmurphy> knikolla: awesome, is there anything we can help with? is there anything ready to review?
17:07:12 <knikolla> i'll ping if i need anything. i looked during the weekend at what code i had written, and was surprised to see it mostly done but not pushed.
17:07:25 <cmurphy> haha :)
17:08:22 <cmurphy> okay moving on
17:08:28 <cmurphy> #topic l1 duty rotation
17:08:48 <cmurphy> last on duty was gagehugo, gagehugo any interesting cases to discuss?
17:09:25 <gagehugo> not much tbh
17:09:49 <cmurphy> yeah i didn't see much come in
17:10:06 <cmurphy> i am up this week, knikolla can you take next?
17:10:13 <knikolla> sure
17:10:22 <cmurphy> cool
17:10:29 <cmurphy> #topic review requests
17:11:00 <cmurphy> one request from vishakha
17:11:04 <cmurphy> #link https://review.opendev.org/710734
17:11:12 <cmurphy> any others?
17:11:24 <vishakha> I needed some help over https://review.opendev.org/#/c/704271/
17:11:39 <gagehugo> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684397/
17:12:00 <vishakha> Its almost finished but I am not able to find the reason of the failure of scoped one test
17:12:44 <cmurphy> gagehugo: nice!
17:13:30 <cmurphy> vishakha: i can try to help later. have you gotten your keystone change to work while manually testing it?
17:16:14 <cmurphy> any other review requests?
17:16:17 <vishakha> cmurphy: I can see the   "openstack_groups" at the service provider side in the shibboleth logs
17:19:05 <knikolla> have you been able to authenticate yourself with openstack groups and the appropriate mappings, without using tempest
17:19:06 <knikolla> ?
17:19:50 <knikolla> if it appears in shibboleth logs, might be something wrong with the parsing
17:21:12 <cmurphy> fwiw i tried your keystone change and it seemed to work in my dev environment, if you can get it to work manually in your dev environment then it's just a matter of figuring out how to get the devstack plugin and tempest plugin to mimick your dev setup :)
17:21:58 <knikolla> also, it doesn't seem like you add a role to the group on that project
17:23:24 <vishakha> cmurphy: thanks. knikolla: I tried adding role to it but it was giving authentication error, also failing other test cases and I have no idea why till now
17:24:52 <knikolla> vishakha: hmmm... the scoping is definitely failing since the user doesn't have access to any projects. since it's failing at assertNotEmpty for projects.
17:25:01 <knikolla> not sure why that would break the others though.
17:26:06 <vishakha> knikolla: I am trying to find the reason.
17:27:53 <knikolla> i'll look into the failures of the prior patchsets later tonight
17:28:03 <vishakha> knikolla: Thanks
17:28:13 <cmurphy> thanks knikolla vishakha
17:28:28 <cmurphy> #topic open floor
17:28:39 <cmurphy> any other business?
17:28:53 <knikolla> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709892/
17:28:54 <vishakha> cmurphy: I wanted some attention on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/697444/
17:29:06 <knikolla> do we have any more backports or should be accept going into rocky EM?
17:31:20 <cmurphy> knikolla: i think the last round of releases caught most of them but i haven't checked thoroughly, do you know of any open stable/* backports straggling that we should focus on?
17:32:14 <cmurphy> vishakha: i hadn't seen amotoki's response yet, will review and follow up, thanks
17:32:36 <knikolla> cmurphy: there's only this. but it's pretty old https://review.opendev.org/#/c/683304/
17:34:31 <cmurphy> knikolla: the followup for that is https://review.opendev.org/710511 which i still need to review, will do that today and maybe we can get that set of patches backported through to rocky this week
17:35:15 <knikolla> are they priority?
17:35:50 <cmurphy> not really imo, i'd be okay with moving rocky to EM and merging them after
17:36:08 <cmurphy> depends on how antsy the release team is to get this done
17:36:12 <knikolla> ++
17:36:29 <knikolla> honestly, i just wanna transition to EM before stable/rocky gate breaks again
17:36:37 <cmurphy> haha
17:36:39 <cmurphy> fair
17:37:14 <cmurphy> if you want to ack that release proposal now that's fine with me
17:37:54 <knikolla> ok, will do that
17:38:15 <cmurphy> cool
17:38:20 <cmurphy> anything else?
17:38:25 <knikolla> done
17:38:33 <knikolla> gotta run now, bye everyone!
17:39:02 <cmurphy> thanks knikolla
17:40:05 <cmurphy> i'll close the meeting too, thanks everyone
17:40:08 <cmurphy> #endmeeting