15:01:10 #startmeeting kolla 15:01:11 Meeting started Wed Jan 22 15:01:10 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mgoddard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:14 The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 15:01:26 o/ 15:01:38 o\ 15:01:42 mgoddard mnasiadka hrw egonzalez yoctozepto rafaelweingartne cosmicsound 15:01:44 o/ 15:01:48 o/ 15:03:05 #topic agenda 15:03:08 * Roll-call 15:03:10 * Announcements 15:03:12 * Review action items from last meeting 15:03:14 * CI status 15:03:16 * Ussuri release planning 15:03:18 * CI scenarios: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/KollaAnsibleScenarios 15:03:20 #topic announcements 15:03:34 I don't have any 15:03:37 anyone else? 15:04:28 Linaro US added 15:04:33 will be more arm64 nodes soon 15:04:46 #topic Review action items from last meeting 15:04:59 look forward to more arms hrw 15:05:08 yoctozepto add kolla train deploy guide 15:05:10 yoctozepto add project-deploy-guide to contributor release guide 15:05:12 mnasiadka to look at using the master branch of ceph, as used in the ceph-container project, as a way to get ceph libraries for CentOS 8 15:05:14 yoctozepto to map which services are covered by approved CI scenarios 15:05:18 yoctozepto claims to have done his 15:05:42 * yoctozepto done my actions 15:05:49 mnasiadka: did you do yours? 15:06:01 * yoctozepto means yoctozepto did yoctozepto's actions 15:06:02 Yeah, it works locally - need to push the change 15:06:21 mgoddard: but if it's on top of your changes - then I will most probably re-push yours as well, right? 15:06:35 O/ 15:06:57 mnasiadka: not necessarily. Check out my changes, cherry pick yours on top, git review 15:07:15 or rebase if you prefer 15:07:22 mgoddard: right, will do that 15:07:31 I have no preference to touch your changes - they look good ;) 15:07:46 they're great 15:07:54 #topic CI status 15:08:03 mgoddard: yoctozepto was complaining about openstacklight I remember :D 15:08:08 Are we green? 15:08:23 if only there were an openstacklight :) 15:08:24 openstacklight ftw 15:08:29 bifrost got disabled so we should be green 15:08:34 we are green-ish - I see more and more occurences of fernet problem on multinode jobs 15:08:43 mgoddard, mnasiadka: in my chat client you are green, yeah 15:08:46 LEDUC Florian proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Use iSCSI multipath for libvirt https://review.opendev.org/700910 15:08:48 but maybe that's a coincidence :) 15:08:56 hrw is red though 15:09:08 and I'm blue 15:09:15 in mine hrw is green, so it's balanced 15:09:16 Merged openstack/kolla stable/train: Fixes swift-object-expirer for Debian and Ubuntu binary images. https://review.opendev.org/703492 15:09:18 Merged openstack/kolla stable/stein: Fixes swift-object-expirer for Debian and Ubuntu binary images. https://review.opendev.org/703493 15:09:19 and you're orange yoctozepto 15:09:30 mnasiadka: not true, me blue 15:10:04 https://i.imgur.com/3eJ9AAr.png shows colours in my client 15:10:06 pretty green, bifrost still not buildable, but revert is awaiting in case it is 15:10:09 thanks everyone for sharing their colours 15:10:25 I'll add a topic for us to do this each week 15:10:33 #topic Ussuri release planning 15:10:39 mgoddard: I like the idea 15:11:06 How are we looking for Ussuri? 15:12:00 always could be better, we have c8 pending still 15:12:31 yes 15:12:41 mgoddard: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701010/ <- reminding - if you were so kind as to review post-merge :-) 15:12:42 patch 701010 - kolla-ansible - Fix multiple issues with MariaDB handling (MERGED) - 19 patch sets 15:12:46 well, with Ceph working I guess we could start properly testing 15:12:49 and phase-out c7 in master 15:12:54 yoctozepto: will do 15:12:57 infra images are issue as it works on local but not CI 15:12:59 overload 15:13:09 overload here too 15:13:38 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694799/ is ready for reviews. just waiting the tripleo ci. 15:13:38 patch 694799 - kolla - Upgrade RabbitMQ to 3.8.2 - 24 patch sets 15:13:41 I work on non-kolla mostly recently 15:13:49 Reminder on ussuri schedule 15:14:10 Kolla feature freeze: Apr 27 - May 01 15:14:11 Kolla RC1: May 11 - May 15 15:14:13 Kolla final release: Jun 1 - Jun 5 15:14:24 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698694/ will be ready for reviews this weekend 15:14:24 patch 698694 - kolla-ansible - Adds Docker image pruning command - 12 patch sets 15:14:30 mgoddard: so 20 March is time to mark 'next release' patches? 15:14:48 hrw: 20 march? 15:15:00 April 15:15:12 ah, yeah 15:15:26 3 months 15:15:33 we've got that much time? 15:15:34 sounds like a lot but will be here soon 15:15:51 let's slack off from now on 15:15:57 free popcorn for slackers 15:16:29 well, a lot of time 15:16:35 "a lot" 15:16:42 also lots still to do :) 15:16:43 "of time" 15:16:54 but for example merging OVN properly means we need to do C8 first and get back to real ''master'' on centos jobs 15:17:01 not many features completed so far 15:17:09 true 15:17:13 yes 15:17:36 I have local backing to push on C8, so hopefully we'll see it move 15:18:03 yeah, let's try to focus on merging that part 15:18:11 just have customer work to do too 15:19:11 yoctozepto: are you blocking https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699413/ on openstacklight? 15:19:12 patch 699413 - kolla - CentOS 8: base and openstack-base images - 10 patch sets 15:19:56 mgoddard: nah, I didn't have time for a legit review 15:20:03 ok 15:20:50 I believe it is fine when you do it and hrw approves but I give only sincere CR+s 15:21:39 looking at our priorities, the top one with patches to review is internal TLS 15:22:24 unfortunately 15:22:40 :/ 15:22:54 I think we should also push through ceph-ansible 15:23:02 as it allows us to remove ceph support 15:23:16 (for CI this is) 15:23:30 we don't want to remove ceph too late in the cycle 15:24:18 Yeah, I think I addressed both mgoddard's and yoctozepto's comments on this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685032/ (dependency for ceph-ansible CI) - if that's ok to go, I can focus on doing the same with ceph-ansible change 15:24:18 patch 685032 - kolla-ansible - External Ceph: keys as variables - 34 patch sets 15:24:53 added to queue 15:25:14 CI scenarios: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/KollaAnsibleScenarios 15:25:17 #topic CI scenarios: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/KollaAnsibleScenarios 15:25:39 oh, so I get to discuss it :-) 15:25:42 yoctozepto: what's changed? 15:25:56 mgoddard: scenario descriptions 15:26:34 I did this in parts so narration style differs 15:29:56 hi, how can I failover external and internal VIP to another node? 15:30:40 mloza: not currently possible (and we are in a meeting so let's discuss it later :-) ) 15:33:15 just adding notes to secondary roles where they are tested 15:33:44 mgoddard: yeah, thanks 15:33:46 makes sense 15:34:11 while we are at CI - I see bifrost - do we plan to support it until the end of the world? Or when (and if) kayobe moves out to ,,bikolla'' then we could deprecate it? 15:34:51 mnasiadka: we could consider deprecation if/when kayobe stops requiring it 15:34:52 bikolla? 15:35:24 mgoddard: so you are planning to use k-a to deploy bifrost-like env for deployment? 15:35:36 yes 15:35:48 PoC: https://github.com/markgoddard/bikolla 15:35:49 mgoddard: I wanted to propose precisely that on Monday 15:35:53 mgoddard: just asking, it breaks every now and then :) 15:36:31 ok, let's make some decisions 15:36:32 and no users except for kayobe I believe 15:36:40 decisions, decisions 15:36:43 I propose we graduate zun scenario to one we want to keep 15:36:49 it covers a few things 15:36:59 Merged openstack/kolla stable/stein: CI: Fix symlinks to failed logs https://review.opendev.org/703486 15:37:02 we could throw more in if it fits but it's a good starting point 15:37:08 and nfv? 15:37:19 we need to extedn the tests by sfc in there 15:37:26 some folk was complaining it broke 15:37:28 nfv already keeping 15:37:40 ah, sorry, me blind 15:37:53 #vote keep zun scenario/ 15:38:04 #vote +1 15:38:05 ? 15:38:14 #startvote ? 15:38:15 Only the meeting chair may start a vote. 15:38:21 #startvote keep zun scenario? 15:38:23 Begin voting on: keep zun scenario? Valid vote options are Yes, No. 15:38:24 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 15:38:32 #Vote Yes 15:38:39 #vote Yes 15:38:44 #vote yes 15:38:45 #vote Yes 15:38:56 #vote Yes 15:39:05 #Vote No 15:39:07 #Vote Yes 15:39:10 proposing to ditch cinder-lvm in favor of Zun 15:39:16 +1 15:39:30 #endvote 15:39:31 Voted on "keep zun scenario?" Results are 15:39:45 Results are 15:39:52 good for them then 15:40:28 lol 15:40:38 I think it's better to vote on etherpad :) 15:41:01 let's go with "any objections?" 15:41:57 and wait 30 minutes? lol :) 15:42:03 Added a section on scenarios to drop 15:42:11 including ceph, ceph-upgrade, cinder-lvm 15:43:25 proposing to keep mariadb 15:44:13 gave us more than enough issues to be kept 15:44:41 hrw: mariadb is for testing mariadb actions 15:45:24 folks, /me leaving 15:45:28 buh-bye 15:45:29 have fun 15:45:33 ignore me - in two meetings at same time 15:45:43 k 15:45:56 keeping mariadb 15:51:35 mgoddard: I guess we have understanding around main parts 15:53:59 proposed an 'alternative compute' scenario: qinling? 15:54:01 senlin 15:54:03 masakari 15:54:05 neutron+ovn 15:56:16 I think we have lost interest 15:56:23 anyway, I made some proposals 15:56:49 #topic Open discussion 15:56:55 Anyone have anything today? 15:57:29 mgoddard: please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1860440 15:57:29 Launchpad bug 1860440 in kolla-ansible ussuri "watcher fails because of missing /etc/timezone" [Medium,New] - Assigned to Dincer Celik (osmanlicilegi) 15:58:31 osmanlicilegi: I'm sure I've seen similar bug reports previously 15:58:44 and we had some patches for it 15:58:46 Its ok to introduce /etc/timezone to master but I'd like to ask for backporting. should I go with only fixing watcher? 15:59:25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1821592 15:59:25 Launchpad bug 1821592 in kolla-ansible "Kolla Watcher Service - Unable to determine the name of the local timezone" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Marek Grudzinski (ivve) 15:59:48 Marked yours as a duplicate 16:00:27 can we just add it as field in globals.yml and then deploy properly? 16:00:30 ah, blind me 16:01:05 hrw: which field? 16:01:22 default_extra_volumes? 16:01:34 iirc stein does not support default_extra_volumes 16:01:40 true 16:01:49 I think we can make it part of the container config 16:02:24 I don't mind if it's done for every container or just watcher 16:02:29 mgoddard: cloud_timezone 16:02:49 mgoddard: seems only watcher 16:02:50 hrw: we just mount the file from the host 16:02:57 mgoddard: ok 16:03:57 Anything else? 16:04:04 nope 16:04:23 nope 16:04:33 * hrw back -> cirros 16:04:36 thanks all, have a nice day :) 16:04:38 #endmeeting