14:00:21 #startmeeting kolla 14:00:21 Meeting started Wed Apr 27 14:00:21 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is frickler. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:21 The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 14:00:34 #topic rollcall 14:01:07 anyone up for a meeting? /me is doing this for the first time, so please bear with me 14:01:37 o/ 14:02:26 \o 14:04:18 #topic agenda 14:04:23 * Roll-call 14:04:23 * Agenda 14:04:23 * Announcements 14:04:23 * Review action items from the last meeting 14:04:23 * CI status 14:04:25 * Release tasks 14:04:28 * Current cycle planning 14:04:30 * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 14:04:33 * Open discussion 14:04:40 #topic Announcements 14:04:55 nothing that I know about, anyone anything to mention? 14:05:08 Ubuntu 22.04 released 14:05:39 infra mirror exists, we lack external repos so k-a CI will not pass 14:05:45 yes, image is available in infra (no arm yet) 14:06:15 no fluentd, influxdb, mariadb 14:06:37 I've started testing devstack, that also has some issues in neutron it seems 14:07:06 hrw: can we use focal repos for those? 14:07:22 no idea 14:07:37 I left ubuntu update for someone else this time 14:07:54 we have similar issues with cs9 update 14:08:02 o.k., maybe just wait and see, then. I can look at it once I get devstack working 14:08:18 next topic? 14:08:29 #topic Review action items from the last meeting 14:08:37 I didn't see any 14:08:48 #topic CI status 14:09:18 the grafana dashboard need updating 14:09:22 #link https://grafana.opendev.org/d/c0d59dad13/kolla-failure-rate?orgId=1 14:09:34 lots of binary job references 14:09:40 I wonder is anyone using it 14:10:20 it would be a good view on CI status if it were up to date, I'll take an action to try and update it 14:10:36 #action frickler update grafana dashboard 14:11:18 anything else on CI things? 14:11:19 frickler: we have new names in Zed so it would be nice to have 14:11:46 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/839047 needs second check - adds binary->source upgrade job 14:12:20 not remember other issue 14:12:21 o.k., I'll look at that later 14:12:39 #topic Release tasks 14:12:51 I must admit I don't know where to look for these 14:13:19 https://docs.openstack.org/kolla/latest/contributor/release-management.html iirc 14:14:12 https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fkolla-ansible+branch:stable%252Fyoga lists 3 patches not merged yet 14:14:29 seems we are at R-23 now https://docs.openstack.org/kolla/latest/contributor/release-management.html#r-23-development-begins 14:14:40 kolla and kayobe are fine in stable/yoga 14:15:06 [all] Communicate end of feature freeze via IRC meeting 14:15:07 frickler: R-23 for Zed. But did we released Yoga? 14:15:40 hrw: hmm, good point 14:16:08 we need to review and merge/reject 3 k-a patches and do RC or release 14:16:52 mgoddard: do you know how to proceed with that? otherwise I guess we'll need to wait for mnasiadka being well again 14:17:09 I'll look at the open patches 14:18:01 anyway, I guess let's move on, then 14:18:15 I don't think any of the patches are critical - just bugfix backports 14:18:23 so in theory we could release 14:19:07 feels a bit too soon though. Where are the usual release blockers? 14:19:18 mgoddard 817076 is not bugfix 14:19:43 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/817076 14:20:21 mmalchuk: that's master. not stable/yoga 14:20:47 oops 14:21:27 sorry 14:21:30 np 14:22:37 #topic Current cycle planning 14:23:05 now we talk Zed 14:23:26 we need a task in k-a to cleanup old containers after upgrade 14:23:51 hrw: containers or just images? 14:24:04 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/839047 job shows old ubuntu-binary-* images on hosts 14:24:07 frickler: images, right 14:25:50 do you want to do that or do we need to find someone? 14:26:08 I did not checked, maybe k-a has something for it already 14:26:14 hrw: this is how it always is 14:26:15 long time since my last deployment 14:26:24 mgoddard: ok 14:26:31 hrw: after wallaby -> xena upgrade you still have wallaby images 14:26:36 they're just not running 14:27:00 ok, so something for me in spare time ;D 14:28:21 anything else or should we go to hrw's topic? 14:29:05 frickler: the ones in whiteboard are for last week 14:29:21 oh, so we can drop them? 14:30:04 dropped all as we discussed them week ago 14:30:13 then we'd just have ... 14:30:21 #topic Open discussion 14:30:45 RDO team just announced Yoga release 14:30:56 for CS8 and CS9 14:32:30 Q: Do we want to offer any support to ceph in ka or just purely the docs? 14:32:55 I know it used to be supported many moons ago, just a thought. 14:33:11 jamesbenson: iiuc it was removed and assumed to be handled externally 14:33:57 jamesbenson: ceph is only external. we dropped installing it and no way back 14:34:20 agree, there are more tools to deploy ceph, eg. cephadm, ceph-ansible, ceph-deploy... users should use any 14:34:25 okay, so no bringing it back then. thanks 14:36:18 another note: nova dropped support for py36, so once we switch to zed/master, forced end of CS8 support I guess unless 14:36:34 unless someone wants to bring in py38 there? 14:37:31 we agreed on move to CS9 14:37:45 external repos are problem 14:38:13 we have same issue with CS9 and ubuntu 22.04 - no external repos yet 14:39:05 for fluentd image we need td-agent build with openssl 3 which also means ruby 3 so upstream has some stuff to handle 14:39:30 https://github.com/fluent/fluentd/discussions/3704 for more 14:41:51 yeah, seems we only can wait for that and maybe start testing initially with a reduced set of external stuff 14:43:18 frickler: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/836664 moves to cs9 14:43:31 jammy comes with mariadb 10.6 at least natively 14:43:33 added you 14:44:16 hrw: do you mean to W-1 instead of review -1? 14:44:30 but I'll have a look at that anyway 14:44:38 effect is the same - ignore zuul, not ready for merge, ready for review 14:45:01 w-1 is too much "work in progress, can ignore" 14:45:21 r-1 is more 'I do not like it, review to check do you agree' 14:45:22 hrw: review -1 isn't technically blocking, though, so if you want to avoid it getting merged, I'd prefer W-1 14:45:46 o.k., asking for more negative feedback is a valid use 14:46:13 moved to w-1 14:46:59 will restore k-a job to make sure it does not pass zuul ;D 14:47:45 after looking at the patch, I hope noone would approve something that removes so much testing 14:48:13 but better be safe than sorry, yes 14:48:42 anything else? otherwise we could end a bit early 14:49:45 nothing more from my side 14:49:53 o.k., thx everyone 14:50:03 #endmeeting