14:00:00 #startmeeting kolla 14:00:00 Meeting started Wed Nov 16 14:00:00 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:00 The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 14:00:04 #topic rollcall 14:00:05 o/ 14:00:09 \o 14:00:20 o\ 14:00:24 o/ 14:00:34 \o/ 14:00:52 /-o-/ 14:01:03 o| 14:01:03 hi 14:01:32 #topic agenda 14:01:32 * CI status 14:01:32 * Release tasks 14:01:33 * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) 14:01:33 * Current cycle planning 14:01:34 * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 14:01:34 * Open discussion 14:01:37 #topic CI status 14:01:45 whiteboard says green, anybody has a different opinion? 14:02:26 ah, I have a different opinion 14:02:42 hrw: debian publish jobs are failing on pushing images 14:02:43 o/ 14:02:58 on pushing means they build fine? 14:02:59 I investigated those, and it seems we just need to do retries or something similar 14:03:14 yes, they build fine 14:03:20 I'll have a look later 14:03:30 #topic Release tasks 14:03:33 o/ 14:03:46 So... release team created patches for K/K-A/Kayobe releases 14:03:46 \o 14:03:57 Frickler nicely responded that it's not the time yet 14:04:31 we basically need OpenSearch in K/K-A and RL9 bits + Ansible bump in Kayobe 14:04:48 but that's for the next topic 14:04:52 #topic Current cycle planning 14:05:18 I started putting more cycles into OpenSearch, since dougsz has only less than one day a week to work on this 14:05:31 so we should get to merging it in a week I hope 14:05:47 bbezak: for RL9 - I think we only have some minor tests failing now? 14:06:08 about releases: https://review.opendev.org/q/Ie928f8a4506f41407d76edcb6b52ca7cddb52214 didn't merged in Yoga 14:06:44 mnasiadka: dummy issues has been solved, there is additional routing tables feature left to add to ansible-role-interfaces for network manager 14:06:57 working on it 14:07:18 kevko, frickler, hrw, mgoddard - willing to merge the stable backport mmalchuk is mentioning? 14:07:26 +2+W 14:07:27 bbezak: fantastic 14:07:46 hrw: thks 14:08:03 darmach: I think you've been looking a bit into the Ansible bump in Kayobe? Want to continue? 14:08:19 i am surprised that anyone uses freezer :D 14:08:33 we try to 14:08:41 :D 14:09:00 mmalchuk: hh, forget :D i was trying 14:09:35 Sure, can take a look at it (again xD) 14:09:44 darmach: great 14:10:10 Ok then, last but not least - we promised mhiner to take a look at his systemd patches 14:10:39 last reviewer was yoctozepto, but he's no longer active in Kolla 14:11:20 I'll try to have a look after OpenSearch merges 14:11:42 kevko/frickler/hrw/mgoddard/anyone - if you have spare cycles to review that patch - would be nice (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/816724) 14:12:30 ack 14:12:31 i will try... 14:12:36 will try too 14:13:15 There is still the skyline patch, which looks like running both nginx and gunicorn in one container - which I personally dislike - so I don't know if it will get in Zed 14:13:27 But let's worry about it after merging what we have to merge 14:13:41 #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 14:14:04 (frickler) Release liaisons 14:14:10 frickler: I think we solved that already, right? 14:14:23 I replaced radek, yes 14:14:33 so if mgoddard wants to continue, we are all set 14:15:12 I think it's reasonable to have ex-PTL as release liaison, we can review in a couple of months if we need more people there. 14:15:30 there's a second topic 14:15:33 mnasiadka: some time ago I adopted skyline patches and reworked to by more kolish ..i will have it somewhere in some branch :P 14:15:42 (m_hiner) Systemd patchset: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/816724 14:16:03 But I don't think we have anybody that has enough knowledge on the patch to answer Martin's questions 14:16:41 although there's this question: significance of shared label when mounting /run directory (kolla_toolbox deployment) 14:16:51 mhiner: can you shed some light what's the problem with that? 14:17:39 problem with that is when trying to mount it with podman it fails because of the shared label 14:18:03 and my question is if its safe to replace it with rprivate, which works 14:18:49 Hello. Trying to deploy designate for the first time, I'm a bit confused what the list "designate_ns_record" actually is? These would be some of my controllers? 14:19:16 greatgatsby_: we have meeting now. can you wait 40 minutes? 14:19:31 yes, apologies 14:19:39 thx 14:20:12 mhiner: but that's different behaviour 14:20:36 at least according to docker docs - https://docs.docker.com/storage/bind-mounts/#configure-bind-propagation 14:21:58 i know but shared label just won't work for podman 14:23:37 does it not work at all or just not for /run? 14:23:41 https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/1834 14:24:09 so basically it means it should 14:24:26 just for /run 14:25:47 i have also created issue for this: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/16305 14:28:17 so that looks like it is an specific issue with nested mounts 14:28:42 will need to look into the details for further debugging 14:29:11 but it works with docker - and we're not merging podman this cycle - only systemd, so that's not very pressing issue 14:29:30 but we'll need to solve it sooner or later 14:30:01 yes, I'll try to dig a bit and we can discuss again next week 14:30:13 okay, thank you 14:31:23 just booted Ubuntu Jammy with podman 14:31:24 and it works 14:31:25 podman version 3.4.4 14:31:52 but maybe I need a bit more details to see what is the problem 14:32:15 might be platform specific, yes 14:32:17 mhiner: if you'll add some more details to the topic on kolla whiteboard - happy to look into it when time comes (probably in two weeks or something like that) 14:32:29 the issue mentions c9 14:33:24 sure, i can update the topic with more info and also some steps how to recreate 14:33:31 thanks mhiner 14:33:37 Ok, let's go further 14:33:48 #topic Open discussion 14:34:27 Would love +2+w on OVN fix stable backports 14:34:30 any chance to review and merge atleast related K-A patches in Kayobe? 14:34:31 https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/kayobe+status:open+author:maksim.malchuk%2540gmail.com 14:34:41 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/864482 14:34:41 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/864483 14:34:41 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/864484 14:35:18 mgoddard: do you or any other Kayobe cores have time to look into Maksim's list? 14:36:10 will try to find some time 14:36:23 can we increase Kayobe cores? can I promote myself? 14:37:04 I was core in fuel-* repos a long ago 14:38:59 core in K-A is also would be good 14:39:17 anyone for second +2 and +w please ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/861727 , https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/861728 14:39:48 I think briefly looking at review stats - you would need to improve that side of being a contributor - but we can add a topic to next meeting about finding candidates for cores and mentoring them a bit towards that goal 14:41:26 ok, any other topics? 14:41:28 ok, thx 14:42:27 I think that's it for today 14:42:30 Thanks for coming! 14:42:37 #endmeeting