14:01:10 <mnasiadka> #startmeeting kolla 14:01:10 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Nov 30 14:01:10 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:10 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:10 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 14:01:14 <TimBeermann[m]> o/ 14:01:14 <mnasiadka> #topic rollcall 14:01:15 <mnasiadka> o/ 14:01:16 <matfechner> o/ 14:01:17 <frickler> \o 14:01:21 <ramona-beermann[m]> o/ 14:01:28 <mhiner> o/ 14:03:09 <bbezak> o/ 14:03:47 <mnasiadka> #topic agenda 14:03:47 <mnasiadka> * Review action items from the last meeting 14:03:47 <mnasiadka> * CI status 14:03:47 <mnasiadka> * Release tasks 14:03:47 <mnasiadka> * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) 14:03:49 <mnasiadka> * Current cycle planning 14:03:49 <mnasiadka> * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 14:03:51 <mnasiadka> * Open discussion 14:03:54 <mnasiadka> #topic Review action items from the last meeting 14:04:19 <mnasiadka> none 14:04:33 <mnasiadka> #topic CI status 14:04:41 <mnasiadka> Whiteboard says green 14:04:50 <hrw> [_][-] 14:04:52 <mnasiadka> #topic Release tasks 14:05:06 <hrw> we have telegraf failed on el9 14:05:15 <mnasiadka> oh - what happened? 14:05:17 <hrw> external repo issue 14:05:23 <hrw> 14:07 < opendevreview> Verification of a change to openstack/kolla master failed: Fix plugin builds with sources using type=git https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/865516 14:05:27 <hrw> this change 14:05:38 <hrw> probably recheck solve the problem, not looked yet 14:05:44 <mnasiadka> ok 14:05:52 <hrw> mmalchuk did recheck 14:06:05 <mnasiadka> So, let's check the road to kolla/kolla-ansible rc1 14:06:06 <mmalchuk> rocky9 jobs failed again( 14:06:23 <frickler> do we have no-empty-recheck policy, too? 14:06:24 <thelounge44> is skyline still candidate for zed release? 14:06:43 <mnasiadka> frickler: we do, but it's sometimes hard to follow 14:07:01 <mnasiadka> basically - let's not do bare rechecks and remind other developers in Kolla reviews to not do them 14:07:06 <hrw> thelounge44: week ago it was postponed iirc 14:07:19 <frickler> just mentioning the failed job at least shouldn't be too difficult 14:07:36 <mnasiadka> so - opensearch - thanks for reviews, I think we're on a good way - I'll update today and call for reviews once again 14:08:04 <opendevreview> Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Run validate-config at the end of deploy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/865331 14:08:06 <thelounge44> hrw: the release was postponed, or skyline PR ? 14:08:13 <mnasiadka> skyline - I don't know if we have capacity to review and get it merged this cycle 14:08:25 <mnasiadka> I remember kevko was unhappy after testing out skyline 14:09:03 <thelounge44> ah, too bad 14:09:34 <thelounge44> i would like to see skyline in zed release tho 14:09:55 <hrw> core team shrinked during Zed ;( 14:09:56 <mnasiadka> He's offline, but you can get in touch with him to understand what are his concerns 14:10:24 <mnasiadka> if we'll have two cores happy to merge the patches before cutting rc1 - then I guess we're good to add it 14:10:39 <mnasiadka> second thing - systemd 14:10:59 <mnasiadka> I did some reviews to podman related patches, I did test out the systemd one - basically looks ok 14:11:08 <mnasiadka> But I don't know if we're happy to merge it last minute 14:12:00 <mnasiadka> Do we postpone it to early Antelope and merge it there (and keep an eye on failures)? 14:12:07 <mnasiadka> well, CI failures mainly 14:13:04 <mnasiadka> frickler: opinion? 14:13:04 <frickler> likely that is the safest way, yes 14:13:14 <mnasiadka> the same second, nice ;) 14:13:20 <mnasiadka> Ok 14:13:46 <mnasiadka> #agreed to postpone systemd to first days of Antelope cycle, merge it then and monitor CI failures throughout the cycle 14:14:18 <mnasiadka> so, what's left from priorities 14:14:58 <frickler> I have a question about that timing, rc1 is when zed will be branched, right? when will final zed release happen then? 14:15:14 <mnasiadka> kolla whiteboard says that for kolla we have opensearch (nearly done), tweaks to upper constraints (not done), pipenv/poetry (not done) 14:15:21 <mnasiadka> so not bad, one out of three 14:15:27 <frickler> or phrased differently: is the deadline in two weeks for rc1 or for final? 14:15:55 <mnasiadka> frickler: yes, rc1 is when branching is done, final should be soon afterwards after we're happy - usually a week or two behind 14:16:22 <mnasiadka> so basically let's merge opensearch and branch 14:16:59 <mnasiadka> all four kolla-ansible priorities have been postponed to Antelope 14:17:07 <frickler> o.k. but systemd would then wait until after final? 14:17:21 <mnasiadka> systemd/podman, secure rbac, let's encrypt and modernising swift role 14:17:44 <hrw> mnasiadka: do we have patches for u-c and pipenv/poetry at all? if not then maybe it is far too late for them? 14:17:47 <mnasiadka> I think so, we usually merge new stuff after final stable 14:18:08 <mnasiadka> hrw: yes, it's too late, I'm just summarising if there's anything we HAVE TO do ;) 14:18:24 <hrw> ok 14:18:44 <mnasiadka> ok, now Kayobe 14:18:59 <mnasiadka> bbezak Rocky Linux 9 - when can we merge it, and why not now :) 14:20:17 <bbezak> soon :). RL 9.1 and CS9 works fine now - as far as overcloud job is concerned, however NM role needs to be polished and one feature needs to be added. Ongoing with ebbex 14:21:25 <mnasiadka> We have two weeks until the deadline - will you make it? :) 14:22:05 <bbezak> that is probable, yes ;)/ 14:22:07 <mnasiadka> hrw: rocky is failing, because we have 9.1 14:22:08 <mgoddard> I'll look at the NM patch again today 14:22:19 <mnasiadka> hrw: and pretty name does not match 14:22:29 <hrw> mnasiadka: simple patch and done? 14:22:38 <mnasiadka> yup 14:23:01 <mnasiadka> any volunteer to fix it? 14:23:33 <mnasiadka> oh well, I'll do it myself then 14:23:36 <hrw> will do 14:25:04 <opendevreview> Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: rocky: update pretty name to match 9.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/866170 14:25:11 <mnasiadka> ok then, seems like we have a way towards branching soon 14:25:24 <opendevreview> Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: base: Rocky Linux 9.1 was released https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/866171 14:25:36 <mnasiadka> lol, I'll abandon mine 14:25:55 <mnasiadka> #topic Current cycle planning 14:25:58 <hrw> dropped already 14:26:18 <mnasiadka> I'll update the Kolla whiteboard with Antelope priorities 14:26:26 <hrw> restored mine 14:26:53 <mnasiadka> and we'll start mentioning them on weekly meetings after we branch 14:27:04 <mmalchuk> mnasiadka maybe need to support 9.x ? 14:27:40 <mnasiadka> It might be, but it can be a follow up later - let's just fix the CI now 14:27:45 <mnasiadka> #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 14:27:54 <mmalchuk> ok 14:27:58 <hrw> https://github.com/influxdata/telegraf/issues/12303 is telegraf bug we are blocked by 14:28:19 <mnasiadka> Only systemd patchset is there - and we decided to postpone it 14:28:21 <opendevreview> Maksim Malchuk proposed openstack/kolla master: Fix plugin builds with sources using type=git https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/865516 14:28:39 <mnasiadka> #topic Open discussion 14:28:46 <mnasiadka> Ok, any open topics for today? 14:29:24 <ramona-beermann[m]> I have one question: Is it possible that someone can review this PR? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/861953 14:31:00 <mnasiadka> commented, I'll keep an eye on it 14:31:05 <ramona-beermann[m]> Only if anyone has time. Maybe a discussion is needed if this fits for all, or someone have other opinions 14:31:11 <ramona-beermann[m]> ty 14:31:55 <ramona-beermann[m]> There is a second one from me for development: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/863982 14:32:00 <mnasiadka> any core or non-core volunteer to review it? would be nice if somebody fresh could take a look and tell us if it helps :) 14:32:36 <mnasiadka> ravlew: up for it? 14:34:07 <mnasiadka> or anybody else, anyway - let's make that better - maybe we can more people be interested if that's written easier :) 14:34:10 <frickler> I'll also revisit, but would be nice to see other feedback first 14:34:13 <mnasiadka> ramona-beermann[m]: thanks for working on this 14:34:22 <hrw> ramona-beermann[m]: +1 and comment 14:34:22 <mmalchuk> will take a look 14:35:38 <ramona-beermann[m]> mnasiadka: your welcome :) 14:36:05 <mnasiadka> any other open topics? 14:36:55 <mmalchuk> my reviews in Kayobe 14:36:56 <mmalchuk> https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:maksim.malchuk%2540gmail.com+status:open+project:openstack/kayobe 14:37:10 <mmalchuk> anyone please 14:38:45 <mnasiadka> mgoddard: any idea if you or anyone else can have a look? 14:40:42 <ramona-beermann[m]> My +1 wouldn't help or? 14:41:04 <hrw> ramona-beermann[m]: and +1 on other one 14:41:19 <mnasiadka> Well +1 always helps, a constructive review helps even more :) 14:41:41 <ramona-beermann[m]> hrw: thanks a lot 14:42:22 <mnasiadka> ok then, let's finish for today - thanks for coming :) 14:42:25 <mnasiadka> #endmeeting