13:00:11 <mnasiadka> #startmeeting kolla 13:00:11 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Aug 23 13:00:11 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:11 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:11 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 13:00:14 <mnasiadka> #topic rollcall 13:00:14 <mnasiadka> o/ 13:00:44 <mmalchuk> \o 13:01:03 <bbezak> [o] 13:01:26 <SvenKieske> o/ 13:01:54 <mhiner> o/ 13:03:20 <frickler> \o 13:03:22 <mnasiadka> #topic agenda 13:03:22 <mnasiadka> * Review action items from the last meeting 13:03:22 <mnasiadka> * CI status 13:03:22 <mnasiadka> * Release tasks 13:03:22 <mnasiadka> * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) 13:03:23 <mnasiadka> * Current cycle planning 13:03:23 <mnasiadka> * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 13:03:25 <mnasiadka> * Open discussion 13:03:30 <mnasiadka> #topic Review action items from the last meeting 13:03:37 <mnasiadka> mnasiadka to send a mail to ML and drop openvswitch-netcontrold 13:03:38 <mnasiadka> done 13:03:44 <mnasiadka> #topic CI status 13:04:05 <mmalchuk> broken 13:04:10 <mnasiadka> A bit red, because we uploaded images to quay.io with bullseye tag, but they have bookworm inside - so kolla-ansible-debian jobs are broken 13:04:11 <mmalchuk> invalid configuration 13:04:37 <frickler> magnum job is still broken with designate testing. I made a bit of progress but no success yet 13:04:39 <mnasiadka> will be fixed by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/892323 and kolla-ansible side 13:04:49 <mnasiadka> will shout when I'll need reviews :) 13:05:00 <frickler> do we need to delete those wrong images? 13:05:58 <mnasiadka> Yes, have a script ready to fire off once we move :) 13:06:02 <SvenKieske> it would be nice, there could be accidental users, no? 13:06:07 <SvenKieske> ah cool :) 13:06:18 <mnasiadka> #topic Release tasks 13:06:25 <mnasiadka> did we merge the UCA patch for Bobcat? 13:06:39 <mnasiadka> yes 13:07:30 <mnasiadka> no RDO for Bobcat yet, we'll need to wait for the coordinated release 13:07:40 <mnasiadka> #topic Current cycle planning 13:08:30 <mnasiadka> So, Bookworm followups are on it's way, we built the images and deploy them on Bullseye host OS, now the patches that use those images need to pass and we should be sort of done 13:08:39 <mnasiadka> Let's Encrypt - didn't have time to have a look 13:09:00 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/887347 13:09:07 <mnasiadka> that one should be first to get in 13:09:23 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fletsencrypt-https 13:09:51 <mnasiadka> kevko: are you going to address hrw's comments? 13:09:58 <mnasiadka> ah, kevko is not with us 13:10:11 <mnasiadka> once all comments are addressed - I guess we should go forward with this 13:10:18 <mnasiadka> Second one is podman 13:10:31 <mnasiadka> mhiner: still having problems on Rocky 9? 13:10:51 <mhiner> nope, that was solved yesterday, I think 13:11:18 <mnasiadka> nice 13:11:29 <mnasiadka> do we have a topic for all the patches we need to merge? 13:11:51 <opendevreview> Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: debian: Add bookworm support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/892323 13:13:42 <mhiner> we have topic for all podman related patches - kolla-podman 13:13:53 <SvenKieske> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:kolla-podman 13:14:00 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:kolla-podman 13:14:49 <SvenKieske> that would've been handy for bookworm too, btw :) 13:15:02 <opendevreview> Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Transition to DockerClient and docker 3.0.0+ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/825786 13:15:29 <mnasiadka> ok, so we have those two topics to prioritise reviews on 13:15:39 <mnasiadka> #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 13:16:02 <mnasiadka> octavia jobboard (frickler) 13:16:03 <mnasiadka> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/888588 13:16:05 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/888588 13:17:04 <mnasiadka> frickler: can we rework it a bit to enable it only when amphora is enabled? we have clouds that only run ovn-octavia-provider and would be a shame to enforce redis on them when it's not needed 13:19:52 <mnasiadka> next one is Enable RabbitMQ HA queues by default by mattcrees 13:19:58 <SvenKieske> I'd say it seems reasonable, but I can't speak for fricker :) 13:19:58 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/882825 13:20:03 <mnasiadka> needs second core 13:20:29 <mnasiadka> and SvenKieske: asking for review/feedback on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/874769 13:20:29 <frickler> sorry, was distracted for a second, I can update the jobboard patch, yes 13:20:34 <mnasiadka> frickler: thanks 13:23:23 <mnasiadka> SvenKieske: commented, will keep an eye on this - I'm not convinced it will not fail under some circumstances - but can understand it's better than what we have today (and as long as it's not default it should be ok) - although we're not testing that in CI 13:23:27 <mnasiadka> and maybe we should 13:24:02 <SvenKieske> nice, thanks :) sure there are still cases not covered by this :) 13:24:10 <frickler> but certainly an interesting topic, I'll try to do a deeper review, too 13:25:00 <mnasiadka> there's also my tripleo-like patch with a lot of dust on it, I'll try to revive it - because that would enable us to do agent restart without really affecting data path 13:25:29 <SvenKieske> got a link for that? I'm curious 13:26:02 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/864780 13:26:23 <mnasiadka> it runs haproxy/keepalived/etc processes in separate containers 13:27:00 <SvenKieske> nice 13:27:20 <mnasiadka> ok, let's move to open discussion 13:27:21 <mnasiadka> #topic * Open discussion 13:27:26 <SvenKieske> ah that's the one I saw earlier, yeah pretty good :) 13:27:26 <mnasiadka> Anybody anything? 13:27:34 <mmalchuk> server-status for RH 13:27:38 <mmalchuk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/891098 13:28:03 <mmalchuk> and reviews in Kayobe: 13:28:09 <mmalchuk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/861397 13:28:13 <mmalchuk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/879554/12 13:28:19 <mnasiadka> bbezak: can you look at the server-status one? ^^ (it's RH, so it's on us) 13:28:41 <mnasiadka> bbezak: and the kayobe ones as well 13:30:14 <mmalchuk> thanks in advance 13:30:20 <mnasiadka> ok, anyway SHPC needs to take this 13:30:25 <mnasiadka> any other topics? 13:30:29 <mmalchuk> another one is a Gnocchi 13:30:46 <mmalchuk> anyone can push the author to make tags? 13:31:11 <mmalchuk> for stable branches we still unbuildable 13:31:12 <opendevreview> Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Revert "CentOS/Rocky: use CentOS Cloud SIG repo instead of Delorean" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/890851 13:32:24 <mnasiadka> I have no idea - maybe try raising an issue in their GH repo? 13:33:11 <mmalchuk> remember someone told here about last week 13:33:25 <mnasiadka> that wasn't me, maybe kevko 13:33:36 <mmalchuk> there was a link to issue 13:33:45 <mmalchuk> need grep logs 13:34:14 <mnasiadka> mrunge: can you help regarding gnocchi? 13:35:47 <mnasiadka> well, it was worth a try - maybe he'll respond later 13:35:56 <mnasiadka> ok, I guess that's it for today 13:35:58 <mnasiadka> thanks for coming! 13:36:00 <mnasiadka> #endmeeting