13:00:27 #startmeeting kolla 13:00:27 Meeting started Wed Sep 20 13:00:27 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:27 The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 13:00:31 #topic rollcall 13:00:32 o/ 13:00:46 \o 13:00:50 o/ 13:01:10 \o 13:01:11 \o 13:01:45 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: CI: add block support to validate-all-file.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894440 13:01:47 o- 13:01:50 o/ 13:02:48 #topic agenda 13:02:52 * CI status 13:02:52 * Release tasks 13:02:52 * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) 13:02:52 * Current cycle planning 13:02:52 * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 13:02:53 * Open discussion 13:02:55 #topic CI status 13:03:00 \o/ 13:03:02 How's our CI, let's see 13:03:35 looks fantastic 13:03:37 https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fkolla&pipeline=periodic&result=FAILURE&result=RETRY_LIMIT&result=POST_FAILURE&result=NODE_FAILURE&result=SKIPPED&skip=0 13:03:41 nothing is green 13:03:42 ;) 13:04:02 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fkolla&pipeline=periodic&result=FAILURE&result=RETRY_LIMIT&result=POST_FAILURE&result=NODE_FAILURE&result=SKIPPED&skip=0 13:04:52 and being serious - one job failed today 13:04:56 doesn't look dramatic 13:05:04 #topic Release tasks 13:05:23 Ok then, SvenKieske pointed out cycle highlights would be nice 13:05:38 if we could merge podman and let's encrypt - we would have some more 13:06:48 I'll draft a patch with Debian 12 and Ansible 7, and we can collaborate further 13:07:24 I'll try to get the fluentd version bump through, too, but it's still a little work to be done 13:08:01 parallax: interested in helping SvenKieske, right? 13:08:19 SvenKieske: can you push a draft at least? 13:08:32 there is a draft 13:08:41 SvenKieske: care to post a #link for parallax to help you out? 13:08:47 sure, once I have a working dev env ;) 13:08:49 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/894948 13:09:11 it's already there, but not finished, could convert it to "WIP" if someone cares for that. 13:09:21 ok then, that's solved 13:09:24 we merged Ansible bump today 13:09:31 so keep an eye out for weird failures 13:10:05 SvenKieske: did you find any other software that needs a bump? 13:10:52 it seems most stuff was already done or we use base distro versions like ceph, I still didn't look at prometheus* versions though 13:10:52 probably all the Prometheus stack, we could try to finish hrw's work with a script and moving it to SOURCES 13:11:12 parallax: want to have a look at the Prometheus versions bump as well? 13:12:50 mnasiadka: alrighty 13:13:00 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/880154 13:13:27 this would be nice to finish off - and move the curl invocations to SOURCES (so kolla-build downloads that) 13:13:48 ah nice, I didn't know this 13:14:01 I filter WIP stuff out, most of the time 13:14:03 ok then 13:14:14 #topic Current cycle planning 13:14:18 that's the proper topic 13:14:31 kevko: how's podman? I see some socket issues in Kolla? 13:16:40 Ok then, I didn't have time to look in Podman in Kolla-Ansible 13:16:46 it's weird 13:16:47 and the same goes for LE 13:16:56 kevko: #define weird :) 13:17:05 well, if I switch to root ..working ... 13:17:10 but it's not permissions issue 13:17:20 same error as this -> https://github.com/containers/podman-py/issues/179 13:18:05 but it happens on all distros? 13:18:22 i think yes, 13:18:27 also on my laptop 13:18:35 reproducible, not weird anymore :) 13:18:40 need any help? 13:18:57 i will ask .. i am checking the code for few minutes ... 13:19:21 i think i will fix in minutes 13:19:39 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: CI: add block support to validate-all-file.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894440 13:19:50 i don't think it will be something hard to fix :) 13:19:58 ok, great 13:20:05 then we could move to kolla-ansible side I guess 13:20:15 yeah.. 13:20:18 and what about LE? I've seen updates on the Kolla side 13:20:30 i addressed all comments .. 13:20:52 and still working like a charm 13:21:25 I added RP+1 to Podman patches 13:21:28 let me find LE ones 13:22:33 ok, did the same for LE 13:22:42 Anybody wants to discuss any of their patches? 13:22:53 (that should land in 2023.2) 13:23:36 there some comments not addressed 13:23:46 mmalchuk: which one ? 13:23:58 in LE were some 13:24:13 lets check them in reviews 13:24:15 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/741340?tab=comments 13:24:22 6 unresolved :) 13:24:54 I'll review the kolla side again. 13:25:21 aaa.. yes, but they are most cosmetic :) 13:25:21 yep 13:25:22 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/893187 - trivial one that needs another core 13:25:37 anyway address, and lgtm from me 13:26:26 OVN change to voting: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894914 - needs two cores 13:28:22 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: base: switch to new Grafana key https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/886086 13:29:00 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/895822 is trivial 13:29:22 I'll keep skimming the branches for some candidates for RP+1 13:29:32 so keep an eye on review dashboards please 13:30:02 #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 13:30:11 jangutter: zun situation is clear 13:30:13 ? 13:30:28 yeah, seems like crickets on the ML. 13:31:35 I think the question is what are we doing with Zun - do we remove it completely and then revert when it works, or just add a precheck that zun does not work currently and link to the bug - that it is a priority for C cycle 13:31:44 currently the notes just mention Debian Bullseye but if etcd 3.4 gets installed then the whole of 2023.1 will be incompatible :-( 13:31:58 2023.2 13:32:04 Ah, sorry, yeah. 13:32:36 I'd say we get a reno deprecating Zun support and add a precheck that it is deprecated and does not work with a link to the bug 13:32:59 Sounds good: will work up a doc review for that. 13:33:04 the other option is to remove it completely, but I think Zun PTL would be unhappy 13:34:08 Since the kolla containers still build, it's still feasible to have the roles in kolla-ansible, (but inactive). 13:34:45 yup 13:34:53 If the kolla containers start throwing up build errors or C cycle hits and there's no traction, that would be a strong hint to remove it. 13:34:57 I see no other voices here, so let's go forward with deprecation and a precheck 13:35:03 and we'll revisit in C 13:35:21 Once that patch is merged - we can go forward with the etcd patches 13:35:46 thanks, will send up a doc change review and we can discuss the specifics on the review itself. 13:36:04 +1 13:36:36 great, thanks for your work on this 13:37:11 no worries, been too long since I've sent up stuff to the community. 13:37:48 SvenKieske: I see https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/2033980 is marked Invalid - do you still want to discuss it? 13:38:58 ah right, well neutron folks are pretty helpful and I guess there's nothing more to do from the kolla side 13:39:38 I see the patch is nearly merged, nice 13:39:58 in the meantime: don't let your radvd processes crash ;) 13:40:00 ok then 13:40:03 #topic Open discussion 13:40:07 Anybody anything? 13:40:54 kayobe reviews) 13:41:03 anyone? 13:41:24 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/861397 13:41:29 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/879554 13:42:08 that's all for now 13:43:42 ok then 13:43:47 I guess it's enough for today 13:44:22 Just a reminder to vote on the PTG time poll, if you don't like using doodle then respond using mail directly to me ;-) 13:44:34 I'll put the doodle links in the PTG etherpad in a minute 13:44:43 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-caracal-ptg 13:44:49 And of course please add topics for discussion 13:45:18 thanks for coming! 13:45:21 #endmeeting