13:01:08 #startmeeting kolla 13:01:08 Meeting started Wed Oct 9 13:01:08 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:01:08 The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 13:01:11 #topic rollcall 13:01:14 o/ 13:01:15 o/ 13:01:21 \o/ 13:01:57 o/ 13:02:10 o/ 13:02:29 #topic agenda 13:02:38 * CI status 13:02:44 * Release tasks 13:02:50 * Current cycle planning 13:02:55 * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 13:03:01 * Open discussion 13:03:03 #topic CI status 13:03:24 Overall green, apart the Ansible locale on CentOS 9 - but should be fixed now with new DIB release 13:03:30 #topic Release tasks 13:03:43 So, we're two weeks into cycle trailing if I can count 13:04:22 Areas of focus are on whiteboard line 226 13:04:49 Noble Kolla-Ansible support is nearly done - need to fight cephadm and Ubuntu 24.04 oddities 13:04:55 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/KollaWhiteBoard#L226 13:05:03 Ubuntu 24.04 ships with an apparmor policy that has a space in the name 13:05:08 and cephadm doesn't support it yet :) 13:05:33 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/869252 13:05:36 the upstream patch is at least merged, it seems? :) 13:05:41 That's the awful Huawei stuff, but we agreed to merge it 13:05:55 SvenKieske: in master, not in reef, and before it gets released it will be Christmas period 13:06:30 I've added my +2 to Huawei patch, if any other core can review and merge - would be nice 13:07:42 https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22mariadb-proxysql%22 - I'm progressing through it slowly 13:08:05 And would be nice to get a second assignee 13:09:00 Basically I can't review everything so bbezak SvenKieske and frickler if you could assign yourself to any reviews in the whiteboard it would be nice 13:09:11 I'm aware we're not going to merge everything this cycle, but let's try 13:09:35 And apart the kevko's big chains - we have the kolla-ansible python CLI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923110 13:09:53 I'll look into it in the evening, I already did some reviews of previous iterations. In general it seems I don't have the time anymore to almost dedicate my complete working hours towards this, unfortunately, so I'll shift stuff in my private time, where possible. 13:10:05 SvenKieske: I've seen you have some reservations for bandit stuff 13:10:19 I haven't had a deep dive yet, but will do this week 13:10:46 well the bandit stuff have some meaning, it's a security check, maybe we can just omit the function, as it's afaik only called once, so maybe no need for an abstraction layer? that's what I remember from memory. 13:10:57 \o 13:11:22 I'll have a look and try to drive to completion this cycle. 13:11:36 I'm still slightly -1 on just silencing the security check, if we don't find a proper solution we can still do it, of course. 13:11:46 Yeah, understood 13:12:26 Additional agenda is also only about Kevko nicely asking for reviews 13:12:36 so I'll go to Open discussion directly - so we can all use remaining time for reviews 13:12:40 #topic Open discussion 13:12:45 Anybody anything? 13:12:50 yeah, please 13:12:51 backport of the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/930170 13:13:24 its trivial solves issues early on inspection of baremetal 13:13:42 needed in yoga asap 13:13:50 and zed 13:13:53 thanks 13:14:18 is it possible? any objections? 13:14:54 can you file a bug that describes what issue it solves? we can then link that and do the proper backports imho? 13:15:02 I'm fine with that, should be helpful for users 13:15:09 I was so busy to create bugreport to attach it 13:15:15 :D 13:15:18 It's not really a bug, it's a feature - but it improves operator's lives 13:15:45 another one core could be fine and I'll prepare backports 13:15:55 So as long as it doesn't bring any inconvenience to users - we could do the backports? 13:17:00 Ok, do the backports mmalchuk - I don't see any objections 13:17:05 ok. thanks 13:17:15 will do today 13:17:19 Anything else? 13:17:23 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/931200 13:17:29 trivial backport 13:17:35 cider part merged 13:17:40 cinder* 13:17:46 so please merge it 13:18:25 bbezak: can you? 13:18:50 done 13:18:55 yay 13:19:07 I guess that's it 13:19:09 I am lookiung for some feedback on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921097 . 13:19:13 will wait another couple of minutes and close the meeting 13:19:44 thats all from my side 13:19:45 thanks 13:19:51 Can anyone with Grafana knowledge have a look in jhorstmann 's patch? 13:20:00 I'm monitoring ignorant. 13:20:45 Ah, I have one - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/931738 13:21:01 Tested in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/931776 13:21:46 well jhorstmann's change is more about avoiding container restarts by not always copying all files, should be possible to review without extensive grafana knowledge ;) 13:22:11 the ovn stuff is on my todo list as well 13:22:19 I have some other things on my radar, but let me add it to my list 13:23:06 Ok, enough for today. 13:23:09 SvenKieske custom dashboards 13:23:10 Thanks for coming! 13:23:20 And please review those patches - so we can release sooner than on christmas 13:23:24 SvenKieske need test to see restarts 13:23:35 anybody want's to pay for reviews during non payed time by employers? (only half joking) :D 13:23:59 :D :'( 13:24:17 thanks for running the meeting mnasiadka 13:24:38 SvenKieske isn't this an opensource? feel open to review) 13:24:51 mnasiadka thanks 13:25:03 #endmeeting