16:02:50 #startmeeting Kosmos 16:02:51 Meeting started Tue Sep 1 16:02:50 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mugsie. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:02:54 The meeting name has been set to 'kosmos' 16:03:06 #topic Announcements 16:03:23 #link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/kosmos-specs 16:03:35 the kosmos-specs repo is now in gerrit 16:03:43 +1 16:03:56 so all future specs must be done there 16:04:10 KunalGandhi: that will include the arch stuff 16:04:26 @mugsie .. ok i will add it there.. 16:04:48 you will need to write an RST doc now - it will not pass gate currently 16:06:09 for the stuff we have - the basic python code can't merge as is. we need to start defining what services we will have, and start building them up with oslo.messaging / oslo.db / and pecan 16:06:36 #topic Architechture Proposal 16:06:48 has anyone had a chance to look at the pull request? 16:06:56 o/ 16:07:04 I am just catching up after 2 weeks of travel around the US 16:07:13 i have actually created a code review 16:07:22 for the source files 16:07:31 KunalGandhi: yeah, thats what can't merge 16:08:13 we need to know what services exist, and define the RPC interfaces / wsgi api framework etc 16:08:47 @mugsie ... i created it not for merge.. the code represents sort of the arch in soruce filess.. it is jsut to get a feedback on the overall modules 16:09:06 OK... 16:10:11 I can leave code reviews on that then 16:10:12 @mugsie ... once we have feedback on that and an agreement on the arch, we start building it with existing libraries 16:10:39 it would be great to get a list of services as well, and what they are responsible for doing 16:11:11 anyone else had a chance to look? 16:11:33 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218709/ 16:12:24 OK, can everyone please spend some time (30 mins or so) this week looking at this? 16:12:29 we need to get traction 16:12:34 Nope, but I will take a look 16:12:43 cool 16:12:59 dougwig: you too :) 16:13:09 #topic Open Discussion 16:13:15 any off agenda items? 16:13:29 as a note our talk for Tokyo got rejected :( 16:13:42 @mugsie ... yeah saw that :( 16:13:52 I would like to poke dougwig on the openstackgerrit integration with the channel. 16:14:00 I think he was working on that 16:14:02 @mugsie .. i had one question 16:14:31 johnsom: i think we have it .... 16:14:41 mugsie My load balancing talk got accepted, so maybe I can make a reference there. 16:14:45 just 0 patches :) 16:14:45 when can we start getting to implement some of these GSLB features and what should our starting point be 16:14:51 johnsom: cool - that would be goos 16:14:54 good* 16:15:09 KunalGandhi: when we get a basic service arch I thinkl 16:15:17 Ah, we do. Some how I missed kunalgandhi's check in 16:15:39 and starting point - using lbaas v2 + desingate to do fail over between 2 regions 16:15:55 @mugsie .. ok.. 16:16:18 so it would be great if all of you could provide feedback on the code reivew 16:16:22 but if people have other ideas, please speak up 16:16:41 the code review is just starter source files and modules.. 16:17:05 OK, anything else to discuss? 16:17:20 also, i am assuming that everyone in the meeting will have bandwidth to contribute code wise 16:17:53 +1 16:18:15 OK, unless there is anything else? 16:18:21 ok cool.. so the action item is provide feedback on the code review 16:18:41 #action all - provide feedback on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218709/ 16:18:47 yup 16:19:05 going once 16:19:12 twice 16:19:18 gone! 16:19:20 #endmeeting