#openstack-meeting-4: kuryr

Meeting summary

1. 1. vikasc, limao_, tonanhngo, lmdaly, ivc_ and apuimedo present (apuimedo, 14:03:06)
   
   
2. kuryr-lib (apuimedo, 14:03:23)
   1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Kuryr#Meeting_September_19th.2C_2016 (apuimedo, 14:03:42)
   
   
3. kuryr-lib: REST/rpc (apuimedo, 14:04:02)
   1. vikasc has some patches for it already (apuimedo, 14:04:34)
   2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342624/ (apuimedo, 14:06:34)
   3. ACTION: apuimedo to review and possibly merge https://review.openstack.org/362023 (apuimedo, 14:09:25)
   4. ACTION: vikasc to add a second config patch for selecting the container-in-vm approach (apuimedo, 14:09:41)
   5. ACTION: apuimedo irenab to review all the rpc patches (apuimedo, 14:12:36)
   
   
4. kuryr-lib: specs/devref (apuimedo, 14:12:54)
   1. after going through the mailing list for a week, I think the option that generates the larger consensus is to keep the specs on openstack/kuryr and to put devrefs close to the code, i.e. in the repo where the implementation will go (apuimedo, 14:13:46)
   
   
5. kuryr-libnetwork: credential selection (apuimedo, 14:15:17)
   1. : Keystone v3 support was merged, but Kuryr will still prefer cloud.yaml auth options over kuryr.conf, as it was doing up until now (apuimedo, 14:15:54)
   2. https://github.com/openstack/kuryr-libnetwork/blob/master/kuryr_libnetwork/controllers.py#L74-L76 (apuimedo, 14:18:21)
   3. ACTION: banix to test swapping the lines (apuimedo, 14:21:11)
   4. there is a new trello board to track work on Kuryr https://trello.com/b/1Ij919E8 (apuimedo, 14:21:29)
   5. committers to kuryr can ping me for being added as members to the trello team (apuimedo, 14:21:49)
   
   
6. : kuryr-libnetwork: release (apuimedo, 14:22:18)
   1. apuimedo sent a patch to get the kuryr-lib requirement in requirements.txt but it was rejected due to global requirements freeze (apuimedo, 14:22:56)
   2. ACTION: apuimedo to request an exception. Which should be granted since nobody else depends on it. (apuimedo, 14:23:15)
   
   
7. : kuryr-libnetwork: container-in-vm (apuimedo, 14:24:08)
   
8. kuryr-libnetwork:general (apuimedo, 14:25:16)
   1. dongcanye got a patch merged for adding endpoint operation info (apuimedo, 14:25:37)
   2. Docker 1.12 swarm mode is not compatible with Kuryr, expected to be fixed on 1.13 (apuimedo, 14:27:38)
   3. ACTION: banix to update *limitations* with the swarm issue (apuimedo, 14:29:11)
   
   
9. kubernetes: devstack (apuimedo, 14:34:30)
   1. apuimedo started WIP patch for kubernetes devstack (apuimedo, 14:34:49)
   2. https://review.openstack.org/371432 (apuimedo, 14:35:01)
   3. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/371432/3/devstack/settings (apuimedo, 14:39:41)
   4. ACTION: apuimedo to make a local.conf.sample with a lot of comments that explain the options (apuimedo, 14:41:24)
   
   
10. py3 asyncio progress (apuimedo, 14:43:53)
    
11. kubernetes: py2/3 eventlet (apuimedo, 14:45:52)
    1. ivc_ pushed a devref that designs a very different approach than the one apuimedo's devref was pushing for (apuimedo, 14:46:55)
    2. ACTION: devvesa vikasc pablochacin irenab to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369105/ (apuimedo, 14:48:02)
    3. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370284/ (apuimedo, 14:49:17)
    
    
12. open discussion (apuimedo, 14:53:27)
    1. huikang scored a big buzzer beater for Kuryr getting it inside Kolla's newton release just as the clock was expiring. I can't thank enough all the efforts from huikang, sdake, inc0 and Jeffrey (apuimedo, 14:54:58)
    2. In order to be on more consumer ready kolla usage, we should have RPM/deb packages and add kolla code to consume those as well (apuimedo, 14:56:11)
    3. limao made a very nice document manually testing the ipvlan proposal with macvlan https://lipingmao.github.io/2016/09/18/kuryr_macvlan_ipvlan_datapath_poc.html (apuimedo, 14:57:30)
    4. http://hicu.be/macvlan-vs-ipvlan (limao_, 14:58:55)
    5. a blog about pro and con : http://hicu.be/macvlan-vs-ipvlan (banix, 14:59:50)

Action items

1. apuimedo to review and possibly merge https://review.openstack.org/362023
2. vikasc to add a second config patch for selecting the container-in-vm approach
3. apuimedo irenab to review all the rpc patches
4. banix to test swapping the lines
5. apuimedo to request an exception. Which should be granted since nobody else depends on it.
6. banix to update *limitations* with the swarm issue
7. apuimedo to make a local.conf.sample with a lot of comments that explain the options
8. devvesa vikasc pablochacin irenab to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369105/

Action items, by person

1. apuimedo
   1. apuimedo to review and possibly merge https://review.openstack.org/362023
   2. apuimedo irenab to review all the rpc patches
   3. apuimedo to request an exception. Which should be granted since nobody else depends on it.
   4. apuimedo to make a local.conf.sample with a lot of comments that explain the options
2. banix
   1. banix to test swapping the lines
   2. banix to update *limitations* with the swarm issue
3. devvesa
   1. devvesa vikasc pablochacin irenab to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369105/
4. irenab
   1. apuimedo irenab to review all the rpc patches
   2. devvesa vikasc pablochacin irenab to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369105/
5. openstack
   1. apuimedo to review and possibly merge https://review.openstack.org/362023
   2. devvesa vikasc pablochacin irenab to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369105/
6. pablochacin
   1. devvesa vikasc pablochacin irenab to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369105/
7. vikasc
   1. vikasc to add a second config patch for selecting the container-in-vm approach
   2. devvesa vikasc pablochacin irenab to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369105/

People present (lines said)

1. apuimedo (146)
2. vikasc (29)
3. banix (28)
4. devvesa (12)
5. ivc_ (10)
6. irenab (9)
7. hongbin (6)
8. limao_ (5)
9. pablochacin (4)
10. openstack (4)
11. lmdaly (2)
12. janonymous (1)
13. tonanhngo (1)