15:02:30 #startmeeting Kuryr 15:02:30 Meeting started Mon Mar 18 15:02:30 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dulek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:02:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:02:34 The meeting name has been set to 'kuryr' 15:02:42 o/ 15:03:08 This is the second time in a long while when dmellado is able to lead the meeting. :) 15:03:29 oh, and you beat me for second 15:03:31 Hi folks! 15:03:33 who's around today? 15:05:00 dulek, I know you are! xD 15:05:38 anyways 15:05:46 #topic kuryr-kubernetes 15:06:31 As we're starting to be close to the release dates (2019-04-10 estimated) 15:07:00 o/ 15:07:36 We'd need to summarize the work we did this cycle into some highlights for the release and the foundation itself 15:07:54 so I've created an etherpad in order to get this done 15:07:57 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kuryr_highlights_stein 15:08:27 folks, I already told some of you but please fill that out by Thu if you have some time and want to showcase what you did do ;) 15:08:48 Sure, I have it on my list. 15:08:51 I see aperevalov on the channel, so just a reminder that there's some stuff he and danil sent up for reviews. It's related to SR-IOV, so it's interesting. 15:09:12 dulek: yep, I saw it and was going to go thru it on the open reviews topic xD 15:09:13 hi 15:09:17 but nevermind! xD 15:09:36 hi aperevalov, do you have any pending reviews that would need some eyes on them? 15:09:48 btw, I'd also love if you could fill out some lines regarding your sriov work 15:10:10 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/kuryr-kubernetes+status:open 15:10:15 dulek, yes some changes: 1) sriov device plugin was extended and we need to support its features (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kuryr-kubernetes/+spec/move-to-new-sriovdp) 15:11:05 2) also we had old bug, but just recently submitted it (https://bugs.launchpad.net/kuryr-kubernetes/+bug/1818606) 15:11:06 Launchpad bug 1818606 in kuryr-kubernetes "direct ports are in DOWN state after attaching to PODs" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Danil Golov (d.golov) 15:12:03 but latest requires modification in OpenStack's neutron sriov-agent 15:12:38 I see, that's why it is on merge conflict, you're depending on a patch to neutron, cool! 15:14:32 These bugs/feature improvements already fixed/implemented and on the review. Hmm, Danil's patch, yes on merge conflict. Ok we'll rebase it, but I think after this Wed, we have a release ;) 15:14:59 Just in case anyone had a question on K8s e2e upstream tests running in our gate (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/643327/) - at the moment it's blocked on fixes to octavia OVN provider. 15:14:59 aperevalov: heh, no worries! thanks in any case! 15:15:15 I can't run it on Amphora driver as it's simply too slow. 15:15:18 dulek: crap! again octavia? xD 15:15:32 I go out for paternity leave 2 months, I come back and still octavia? xD 15:15:45 cgoncalves, shame! xD 15:15:46 Octavia OVN provider is awesome and once it's stable I will stop complaining. 15:16:19 That's all from my upstream work at the moment, I guess. 15:16:24 thanks dulek 15:16:38 maysams: ltomasbo any news regarding NP testing or overall? 15:16:42 Also we're working on binding (rebinding at CNI stage) from kernel drivers to vfio/uio like intel's SR-IOV CNI is doing. It's Danil's task. And his next task is: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kuryr-kubernetes/+spec/extend-sr-iov-drivers-dynamic-subnet-id. 15:17:30 aperevalov: great, thanks for letting us know! 15:17:54 dmellado: me and Luis have been working on adding the support for text on the targetPort field of the SVC and text on the port of Network Policies 15:17:58 dmellado, not much on my side. I posted a ps for fixing the services with port defined with text instead of integers 15:19:35 I remember about tempest test for SR-IOV and it almost done, but was postponed. I think after this Wed I'll be able to return to this task. And after that we had a plan to return to DPDK. Danil tested Gary's patch, but as I know, he hadn't time to give +1. 15:20:12 aperevalov: no worries, in any case IIRC the main issues for tempest were about the lack of HW upstream in order to run tehem 15:20:14 them 15:21:35 dulek: btw, I didn't have time to check all yeat after I'm back 15:21:46 yeat? 15:21:53 but I was wondering if you were leading the effort to migrate the upstream jobs to ubuntu bionic 15:21:56 i.e. 15:22:01 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/devstack-bionic 15:22:06 * dulek checks… 15:22:44 dmellado: I think we got that for free due to depending on devstack-tempest. 15:22:50 hongbin: we got a patch from gmann irt this for kuryr-libnetwork, could you please have a look? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/642321/ 15:22:52 s/due/thanks to 15:23:02 otherwise, I'll just plain merge it ;) 15:23:10 dulek awesome then! 15:23:14 yeah 15:23:37 dmellado: Hm, but what about multinode job? 15:23:49 this is latest legacy migration etherpad link #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/legacy-job-bionic 15:23:59 dmellado: ack 15:24:14 dmellado: Ah, it's fine, we use openstack-two-node nodeset, so got it for free again. 15:24:20 thanks gmann 15:24:54 so we only got that patch to merge and we'd be fine 15:25:05 gmann: we'll merge it asap 15:25:43 dmellado: yhanks for follow up 15:25:45 thanks 15:28:36 So… Anything else? 15:28:53 all right some from my side I've been fighting with fedora and devstack xD and I'm adding ipblock support to our NP implementation, besides checking upstream goals, and TC stuff. 15:29:40 just wanted to let you know folks that I might be online at strange hours as I'm trying to work on a schedule that works for me and my newborn xD 15:30:02 Thanks all for attending! 15:30:06 #endmeeting kuryr 15:30:21 dulek: you didn't add me as a chair, please end this xD 15:30:35 #endmeeting kuryr