14:07:27 #startmeeting Kuryr 14:07:28 Meeting started Mon Apr 8 14:07:27 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dulek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:07:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:07:31 The meeting name has been set to 'kuryr' 14:07:38 #chair ltomasbo maysams 14:07:39 Current chairs: dulek ltomasbo maysams 14:07:56 I think dmellado won't be joining today. 14:08:00 And sorry for being late. ;) 14:08:24 #topic announcements 14:08:50 Without further delay - we finally fixed the gates by switching to CentOS amphora. 14:09:21 The issue was probably caused by a change on Octavia side, but I doubt it. 14:09:28 Here's the fix from Octavia folks: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/650417 14:10:16 I haven't checked it as I would want it to go into the nightly amphora first, so we won't build it on the gate. 14:10:50 The point is - I tried reverting the Octavia commit that supposedly caused this and it wasn't helping. Dunno, maybe it's a combination of multiple issues. 14:11:25 hi! 14:11:32 Yes. Thank you dulek for your help identifying the fix 14:11:35 sorry I'm late 14:11:51 Hm, now that I think about it, the revert wasn't doing much, as we were still using using prebuilt amphora… 14:12:24 johnsom: So you're probably right about that issue and when testing it locally without your patch I probably did something wrong. 14:12:51 Yeah, it comes down to some of 14:12:52 johnsom: Where by your patch I mean https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648504/ - the one that caused it. 14:13:06 oddities of the ifupdown package 14:13:51 Right, CentOS was fine, so it's both that code + oddity of Ubuntu package. 14:14:01 Okay, coool, thanks a lot johnsom for assistance. 14:14:39 With that I don't have much more to communicate, I'm mostly stuck with downstream work lately. 14:14:47 #topic open discussion 14:14:55 Anyone have something to be raised? 14:15:47 I don't have much either as I was out last week 14:17:32 Me neither. Just that I more less finished adding support for Network Policies with named ports 14:17:43 \o/ 14:18:17 These two patches should handle it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648905/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/650148/ 14:18:42 maysams, what about the ipblock? is that underneath? 14:18:58 ltomasbo: it's 14:19:12 I mean, this is the first patch to get in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/645139/11 14:19:23 ltomasbo: ipblock is the first one in the chain 14:19:35 yes 14:20:07 Okay, so with the gate open I guess I should start reviewing this stuff? ;) 14:20:26 dulek, that would be great! 14:21:34 maysams: Okay, I will. 14:21:45 Okay, so if anyone doesn't have anything more to add we can close this and move to #openstack-kuryr? 14:22:05 sounds good! 14:25:51 sounds good to me as well 14:27:34 #endmeeting