08:00:12 #startmeeting large_scale_sig 08:00:12 Meeting started Wed Apr 22 08:00:12 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:00:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'large_scale_sig' 08:00:21 #topic Rollcall 08:00:25 Calling all Large Scale SIG meeting participants! 08:00:38 hello! 08:00:39 mdelavergne: how are things? 08:00:45 fine and you ? 08:00:53 o/ 08:00:59 all fine! 08:01:13 Our agenda for today is at: 08:01:17 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting 08:01:50 Let's wait a minute to give masahito a chance to join 08:02:32 #topic Progress on "Documenting large scale operations" goal 08:02:39 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-documentation 08:02:49 We had one TODO left for amorin from last meeting (propose patch against Nova doc) 08:02:59 any progress there? 08:03:06 unfortunately no 08:03:13 I wasnt able to move forward on that topic 08:03:17 it's ok, I'll push it back 08:03:21 #action amorin to propose patch against Nova doc 08:03:26 thanks 08:03:55 anything else on that topic? things we should be doing? help needed? 08:04:19 hum 08:04:30 maybe if some of you are interested in filling the wiki page 08:04:51 belmoreira: I was wondering if CERN could share scrubbed config files, and if that would be interesting 08:05:02 this one: 08:05:04 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Large_Scale_Configuration_Guidelines 08:05:13 this would be really nice indeed 08:05:43 I don;t know if the "everything we do is public" extends to config files though :) 08:05:58 not sure how interesting that is 08:06:33 maybe not all config files, but the key elements that make your openstack scale in a better way 08:06:36 in my opinion it would be better to point out an issue and why we use a particular option 08:06:46 yes 08:06:53 ok, so the "scaling story" is probably more interesting 08:07:05 we'll get to that in next topic 08:07:27 #topic Progress on "Scaling within one cluster" goal 08:07:33 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-cluster-scaling 08:07:34 I'm afraid we don't anything interesting in the config. Is more an architecture decision 08:08:00 masahito is not around so I'll push back his work item 08:08:04 #action masahito to prepare oslo.metric POC code release 08:08:16 Regarding scaling stories, I did create a wiki page for long-term storage of submitted stories 08:08:21 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Large_Scale_Scaling_Stories 08:08:35 People can/should still submit them to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/scaling-stories, as it's simpler to dump content there 08:08:44 belmoreira: do you still plan to submit one ? 08:08:57 yes, I added some notes, still WIP 08:09:10 it should be there 08:09:21 oh, I see it 08:09:36 I'll let you continue working on it before copying it to teh wiki 08:09:50 we will also write a blog post about this 08:09:59 #action belmoreira to continue working on scaling story on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/scaling-stories 08:10:00 nice! 08:10:30 oneswig also had one story planned around bare metal cluster scaling 08:10:49 but he has not been around much lately. I'll try to reach out to him off-meeting 08:11:11 #action ttx to talk to oneswig about his bare metal cluster scaling story work item 08:11:25 OK, anything else on that topic? 08:12:00 ok, next up... 08:12:03 #topic Large scale operations now-virtual OpenDev track 08:12:09 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/LargeScaleOps_OpenDev 08:12:16 The date is now set: June 29 - July 1 08:12:26 So please all block those dates in your calendar! 08:13:01 The goal is really to start a longer discussion, and continue it in the SIG 08:13:15 since we won;t be able to cover that much during the event 08:13:42 belmoreira: anything to add? 08:13:55 no 08:13:57 thanks 08:14:06 #topic Next meeting 08:14:15 Next sync point in two weeks ? 08:14:22 yup 08:14:32 #info next meeting: May 6, 8:00UTC 08:14:37 Oh, I wanted to ask... 08:14:42 Do you find the meeting summaries and reminders I post to the mailing-list useful ? 08:14:53 If not, I can stop writing them :) 08:15:24 I read them, but if it's too much work I can read the pads :p 08:15:50 I dont receive them, I might have an issue with my rules 08:15:53 I don't know if it attracts people though 08:15:54 ttx they are really informative for everyone that doesn't attend the meeting 08:15:57 anyway it's a good idea I think 08:16:01 I think it's good to attract potential new members to teh SIG, but if that's the only goal maybe a monthly summary of large scale SIG progress would be enough 08:16:27 I don't want to create fatigue and train people to ignore them 08:16:48 yep, one per month might be sufficient to attract people 08:16:49 ttx I see a lot of value in them 08:17:03 OK so meeting summaries are useful 08:17:09 Maybe the Monday meeting reminder is too much 08:17:27 unless that is the way you remember the meeting :) 08:18:10 Maybe if you do only one per month you could put the calendar for the next meetings, just in case people want to join in 08:18:22 :) if they don't create a lot of friction for you I think both are good 08:18:41 no it's not too much work. I'll keep them. Just doublechecking they are worth it :) 08:19:07 That is all I had for today... anything else we should discuss? 08:20:13 I'll take that as a no.... Thanks everyone! Have a great day! 08:20:34 #endmeeting