13:01:06 #startmeeting MagnetoDB 13:01:07 Meeting started Thu Mar 13 13:01:06 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is isviridov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:01:10 The meeting name has been set to 'magnetodb' 13:01:19 Hi everybody 13:01:25 Hi 13:01:28 hi 13:01:28 Hello 13:01:30 Hi 13:01:50 hi 13:01:53 So let us start 13:01:57 hi all 13:02:03 Teh agenda for today https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/WeeklyMeetingAgenda 13:02:15 #topic General project status overview 13:02:34 So, i'm happy to see all of you here. 13:03:00 As you know we have released POC version and now started working on 2.0.* 13:03:28 The main goals for current 2.0.1 version are: 13:03:42 * openstack infra integration 13:03:56 * definition MagnetoDB API 13:04:32 * devstack integration 13:06:36 So, current version scope https://launchpad.net/magnetodb/+milestone/2.0.1 13:07:56 Should we proseed with next topic? 13:08:06 looks reasonable 13:08:14 + 13:08:20 + 13:08:37 #topic MagnetoDB API Draft status 13:08:56 achudnovets, looks it your song 13:09:28 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/api 13:09:53 there is the MagnetoDb API draft https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/api 13:10:12 achudnovets, good job! 13:10:37 achudnovets, have you discussed it with smb from community? 13:11:22 nope, I'd like to hear some comments about it 13:11:49 Probably the ML is better place for that 13:12:45 isviridov: +1 13:13:03 I agree 13:13:19 #action achudnovets start ML thread with API discussion 13:13:54 achudnovets, i've seen BP about API implementation. 13:14:14 Good job, I've added most pf them to 2.0.1 version scope 13:14:24 #link https://launchpad.net/magnetodb/+milestone/2.0.1 13:14:41 #topic Third party CI status 13:15:30 So, with MagnetoDB we need to have CI process out if openstack infra, but together with it 13:15:47 1. running cassadnra integration test 13:16:00 2. run devstack integration tests 13:16:23 Why we need CI outside openstack infra? 13:16:39 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnetodb/+spec/third-party-ci 13:16:47 isviridov: Why don't we run devstack integration tests in infra? 13:16:55 achudnovets, because of 1. and 2. ) 13:17:12 ok, I see, thanks :) 13:17:47 aostapenko, we are not a part of openstack yet. In future, when we will integrate. We will run it there. 13:18:58 isviridov: I suppose we can do new gate with devstack in infra 13:20:07 aostapenko, not sure, that we can add our project to devstack. It can brake whole dev process. 13:20:16 now we have some requirements for environment 13:20:45 as results we need own env 13:21:15 which will be integrated with Infra 13:21:46 we hava 3 way for this 13:22:26 1. Gerrit layer 13:22:44 2. zuul layer 13:23:04 3. Nodepool layer 13:23:26 Do we know what the way we go now? 13:23:31 some information you can find here https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org/msg01013.html 13:24:21 now we use Gerrit layer integration for cassandra unittests 13:24:56 but for devstack testing we need other way 13:25:24 zuul or nodepool layers integrations 13:25:40 achuprin, looks we need the wiki page about it. 13:26:27 can we discuss this offline? 13:26:58 Yeap, let us go to #magnetodb for discussion 13:27:01 achuprin: I think all this tests can be run by different gates in infra 13:27:36 #action achuprin discuss with infra the best way for our CI 13:28:01 #action achuprin create wiki page with CI description 13:28:04 isviridow, wiki - ok 13:28:23 next topic? 13:28:26 + 13:29:22 + 13:29:24 #topic Support of other database backends except Cassandra. Support of HBase 13:29:35 + 13:30:17 aostapenko, yes it will be run by different gates, but for this we need specific env. (cassandra requirements for example ) 13:30:31 We have to look at other database for MagnetoDB, not only Cassandra 13:31:22 do we, really? 13:31:49 It is common case, HBase comes together with big data processing and we have evaluate if HBase or some other DB suits 13:32:12 ikhudoshyn, hey man 13:32:16 so by 'other database' you mean hbase, right? 13:32:25 ) at least 13:32:28 isviridov, hi there 13:32:50 Do you have anything to share with us in that dirrection? 13:33:20 how magneto can interact with HBase? 13:33:45 ominakov: the same way as with cassandra 13:34:06 ominakov, the underlying databate pluggubility by design. 13:34:18 are there any other candidates, apart from hbase? 13:34:18 'cos with hbase i kinda got a tiny complain 13:34:42 ominakov, it is possible just to implement another DB support 13:34:58 ikhudoshyn, riak, mongodb. What do you think? 13:34:59 ominakov, thats the issue 13:35:30 ikhudoshyn, but HBase always comes with Hadoop and Big Data 13:37:02 I think we have to start ML thread 13:37:14 isviridov: + 13:37:19 + 13:37:21 ikhudoshyn, can you drive it? 13:38:16 #action isviridov ikhudoshyn start mail thread about evalution other databases as backend for MagnetoDB 13:38:35 #topic Devstack integration status 13:38:45 It is vital thing actualy 13:38:56 vnaboichenko, SpyRay any news? 13:39:07 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnetodb/+spec/devstack-integration 13:39:56 we have done script which deploys cassandra 2.02 from tarbar with oracle jdk 1.7 and magnetodb from master 13:40:12 we are investigating in cassandra cluster manager 13:40:13 https://github.com/pcmanus/ccm 13:40:35 WOW! Looks as huge progress 13:40:39 now looks good, we will modify scripts for set up nodes with this manager 13:41:17 I think we need some guide for work with it 13:41:39 yes, i will made a wiki 13:41:45 Awesome! 13:42:09 #actio vnaboichenko devstack integration guide in OpenStack wiki 13:42:15 #action vnaboichenko devstack integration guide in OpenStack wiki 13:42:33 #topic Weekly meeting time slot 13:43:18 We have to think about better time for our meeting to cover US contributors. 13:43:38 What about 1700 UTC 13:43:44 do we have maybe a table with free time slots? 13:43:48 Other suggestions? 13:44:18 17 is good 13:44:26 miarmak_, good point. We have to check free slots 13:44:30 I'll do so 13:44:36 1700 UTC is good for me 13:44:47 #action isviridov find better time slot for meeting 13:45:04 isviridov: yeah, and after that take several slots and vote for them 13:45:05 #action isviridov start ML voting meeting time 13:45:18 miarmak_, yeap 13:45:25 awesame) 13:45:31 #topic Open discussion 13:45:47 ikhudoshyn, how was your fly? 13:45:54 ) 13:46:40 ikhudoshyn, it looks like we can count on you in PST timezome. 13:47:08 is it 6.47 am now?) 13:47:26 miarmak_, yeap. But we have seen him 13:47:55 Ok, guys. Looks like we finished 13:48:15 Thx and see you at #magnetodb 13:48:20 btw 13:48:27 oops, guys, had issues with connection 13:48:31 i remember 1 thing about time 13:48:46 miarmak_, pelase 13:48:53 we have time change soon in ua 13:49:09 ) 13:49:12 miarmak_, good point. I'll take it into account 13:49:18 thx) 13:49:21 #endmeeting