09:02:47 #startmeeting magnum 09:02:48 Meeting started Wed Sep 2 09:02:47 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is flwang1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:02:49 flwang1: maybe just a open discussion will suffice, i dont have anything in particular on the agenda, maybe apart from 1.19 support 09:02:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:02:52 The meeting name has been set to 'magnum' 09:03:02 o/ 09:03:05 o/ 09:03:06 why not :) 09:03:09 yep 09:03:25 i'm trying to build a hyperkube image for v1.19.0 09:03:28 but no luck so far 09:03:43 i'm still trying to figure out what i'm missing 09:04:42 and besides that, i'm working on several security enhancements 09:04:50 as you can see from the code review 09:06:28 as in the hyperkube image fails to build? 09:06:40 do you not agree with the approach of using binary? 09:07:18 i don't mind using binary 09:07:34 and i know we have to for that way 09:07:37 but, again 09:07:44 we can't break the upgrade 09:09:41 yep i think the upgrade needs to include a piece of code to stop old containers and start new processes 09:10:21 yep, technically it should be able to do that. i just want to highlight this is the baseline 09:11:03 fedora atomic -> coreos was only breaking because of the operating system incompatibility, dont see why this way it needs to break upgrades 09:11:37 yes 09:11:59 btw, did you try v1.18.8? when using v1.18.8, the prometheus-operator failed to start 09:12:35 i got this http://paste.openstack.org/show/797363/ 09:12:41 any idea? 09:13:23 I will test now 09:13:44 Is it repeatable? 09:14:13 on my local, it is 09:14:19 it's repeatable 09:14:21 Have you tried bumping up prometheus operator version? 09:14:36 i'm using v8.2.2 09:14:48 bumped 09:15:36 looks like the latest chart is 9.3.1 09:17:02 ok. i will give it a try 09:17:29 flwang1: can I ask you to review this PR btw? https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/pull/1067 09:18:16 it is for a github action to release cinder csi and manila csi chart 09:18:42 but the controversy is around whether the releases should use latest or specific version tags 09:18:44 sure, it looks good. i will take another look tomorrow 09:20:47 i understand it is master branch but i think release shoudld have specific version tags 09:22:00 i think it's a similar issue like our heat container agent tag 09:24:20 http://paste.openstack.org/show/797364/ 09:24:34 this timeout maybe happened earlier 09:25:03 i know you have done some work for the helm in magnum 09:25:07 any idea how to debug this? 09:31:35 #endmeeting