15:00:10 <bswartz> #startmeeting manila
15:00:11 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Sep 18 15:00:10 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:12 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:14 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'manila'
15:00:19 <rushil> Hi
15:00:23 <xyang1> hi
15:00:26 <vponomaryov> hi
15:00:27 <bswartz> hello all
15:00:29 <tbarron> hi
15:00:38 <vvechkanov1> Hi)
15:00:56 <bswartz> #agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings
15:00:58 <scottda> hi
15:01:15 <bswartz> so we've still have bugs :-(
15:01:23 <bswartz> I'm going to start with those
15:01:28 <bswartz> #topic bugs
15:01:36 <bswartz> #link https://launchpad.net/manila/+milestone/juno-rc1
15:01:44 <bswartz> I see 5 still open
15:02:08 <bswartz> lgreg: ping
15:02:36 <bswartz> vvechkanov1's 2 bugs have open reviews
15:02:55 <rushil> bswartz: lgreg is not on the channel
15:03:03 <bswartz> I see
15:03:16 <bswartz> deepak isn't here either
15:03:35 <bswartz> anyways this is a reminder that we've got just 1 week until RC1
15:03:47 <bswartz> top priority is closing out these 5 bugs
15:04:01 <bswartz> does anyone have any bugs that aren't on this list that should be?
15:04:18 <vponomaryov> bswartz: there are new bugs,but scheduled for kilo
15:04:32 <bswartz> we can still target bugs to rc1 if they need to be
15:05:00 <bswartz> at this point it has to be critical or super low risk though
15:05:29 <bswartz> I'll ping deepak and greg as soon as I see them
15:05:40 <bswartz> #topic dev status
15:05:48 <vponomaryov> Dev status for last week:
15:05:55 <vponomaryov> 1) Fixed ubuntu image for Manila according to bug: #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1370216
15:05:58 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1370216 in manila "Samba not configured to use registry configuration" [Undecided,Fix released]
15:06:12 <vponomaryov> 2) Several bugfixes to Generic and NetApp cmode drivers were commited
15:06:19 <vponomaryov> 3) Other attempts were directed to testing and bugfixing, available for review:
15:06:19 <vponomaryov> 3.1) #link https://review.openstack.org/119621
15:06:19 <vponomaryov> 3.2) #link https://review.openstack.org/122399
15:06:47 <vponomaryov> that's the main
15:06:48 <bswartz> k I need to review those
15:06:57 <bswartz> thanks
15:07:03 <vponomaryov> (3.2) will be updated with unittests
15:07:23 <bswartz> okay on to the fun stuff
15:07:31 <bswartz> #topic paris design summit
15:08:05 <bswartz> so those of you who read the ML may have noticed that we won't be using summit.openstack.org to plan the design summit
15:08:41 <bswartz> the new format is to have the various teams organize their design summit topic on etherpads
15:09:00 <bswartz> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Planning
15:09:52 <bswartz> There is an etherpad specifically for manila
15:10:02 <bswartz> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-manila-summit-topics
15:10:14 <bswartz> And I got things started by dumping all of my ideas onto the etherpad
15:10:46 <xyang1> bswartz: do you know how much time we will get for the design summit? number of sessions?
15:10:53 <bswartz> I don't want to monopolize the time with my topics, but I wanted to present a format and get things started
15:11:02 <bswartz> xyang1: still no idea
15:11:38 <bswartz> but there will be "pods" for each project team and we'll get one of our own so we can have practically unlimited time to talk among ourselves
15:11:39 <lgreg_1> bswartz: here….
15:11:53 <bswartz> lgreg_1: hey we missed you on the bugs topic
15:12:20 <lgreg_1> bswartz: apologies, on other call
15:12:20 <bswartz> lgreg_1: I'll sync up with you on the status of the 2 netapp driver bugs
15:12:53 <bswartz> I think it's still to early to worry about how to cram the topics into a fixed amount of time
15:13:17 <bswartz> right now I'd rather be brainstorming cool stuff to work on so we can pick the best ones for the public forum
15:13:22 <lgreg_1> bswartz: ok, will catch up
15:13:51 <bswartz> I'd rather have the problem of too many cool ideas and not enough time rather than too much time and not enough cool ideas
15:14:43 <bswartz> ofc we'll need to spend some time of boring stuff
15:15:52 <bswartz> hey vponomaryov, vvechkanov1, will you guys be able to come to the summit?
15:16:17 <vponomaryov> bswartz: unfortunately, I guess no
15:16:34 <bswartz> :-(
15:17:01 <bswartz> I hope you can get Mirantis to reconsider -- it would be great to have you there
15:17:22 <bswartz> xyang1: is it safe to assume you're coming?
15:17:31 <xyang1> bswartz: yes
15:17:53 * bswartz would love to have the whole core team in 1 place
15:18:05 <bswartz> anyways, any questions on the summit or the etherpad?
15:18:26 <vponomaryov> bswartz: what do we plan to be integrated with HEAT project?
15:18:56 <bswartz> vponomaryov: a plugin to heat so that heat templates can invoke manla
15:18:58 <bswartz> manila*
15:19:41 <bswartz> #topic incubation update
15:19:44 <nileshb> any plan on integrating with Sahara?
15:20:02 <bswartz> nileshb: I don't have any -- please suggest it if you do
15:20:11 <nileshb> ok sure
15:20:35 <bswartz> so the current word from infra is that the stackforge/manila->openstack/manila rename is happening tomorrow at 20:30 UTC
15:20:56 <bswartz> I'm going to be online at that time to help out if things go badly
15:21:23 <bswartz> there are SO MANY places where stackforge/manila appears in the code
15:21:35 <bswartz> I worry that it will take a while to get them all
15:21:41 <bswartz> and get things stabilized
15:21:48 <bswartz> so we can make RC1 next week
15:22:00 <xyang1> bswartz: we are just changing the location, but not the program name itself, correct?
15:22:15 <bswartz> yeah it's just to reflect that we're now incubated
15:22:34 <bswartz> nothing else changes
15:23:00 <bswartz> but sadly I do expect things to break so any help would be appreciated when it comes to fixing them
15:23:44 <lgreg_1> bswartz: I'll assist if needed.
15:23:49 <bswartz> #topic open discussion
15:23:55 <bswartz> okay anyone have anything else
15:24:15 <bswartz> xyang1: I wanted to ask you about CI since I've been looking at Manila CI
15:24:25 <bswartz> xyang1: are you responsible for the emc cinder ci?
15:24:27 <xyang1> bswartz: sure
15:24:33 <xyang1> bswartz: yes
15:24:42 <bswartz> and have you given any thought to how you'd do it for manila?
15:25:08 <xyang1> bswartz: I saw you asked for an CI account for NetApp manila driver.  we are planning for it too
15:25:08 <bswartz> I want to setup something similar in kilo, and I've been hacking to see what's possible
15:25:11 <xyang1> bswartz: any dates?
15:25:24 <xyang1> a date will help us planning
15:25:44 <bswartz> hmm
15:26:09 <bswartz> my goal is to have something running before juno releases
15:26:11 <xyang1> the naming is tricky too
15:26:15 <bswartz> but I don't expect other to do the same
15:26:17 <xyang1> Juno?
15:26:21 <xyang1> 10/16?
15:26:36 <bswartz> that's my goal -- maybe I'm crazy
15:26:47 <xyang1> that will be too soon for us:)
15:27:00 <xyang1> we have emc-vnx-ci for cinder
15:27:05 <bswartz> yeah I think the goal for the team should be to have things working by end of kilo
15:27:06 <xyang1> so I don't know how to name it for manila
15:27:24 <bswartz> xyang1: there's no reason you couldn't use the same CI account for 2 projects
15:27:28 <xyang1> when I asked for CI account, they didn't want to include cinder in name
15:27:44 <bswartz> in my case I'm trying not to distract the guys working on the cinder CI so I asked for a second account
15:27:49 <vponomaryov> xyang1: project names can be changed
15:27:51 <xyang1> bswartz: they are triggered by cinder commits now
15:27:51 <bswartz> long term though we want to merge it back to 1 account
15:28:02 <xyang1> I don't know what it means to run both
15:28:20 <xyang1> CI in cinder runs tests for Cinder, CI in manila runs tests in manila
15:28:23 <bswartz> xyang1: "Jenkins" is one account that runs on all projects -- it just knows to invoke different tests
15:28:46 <bswartz> emc-vnx-ci can do what jenkins does and run on more than 1 project
15:29:04 <xyang1> maybe it is ok
15:29:15 <bswartz> it's not a high priority
15:29:19 <xyang1> but it is already overwhelming to handle the number of commits in Cinder
15:29:33 <xyang1> we can only handle about 20 commits a day
15:29:47 <xyang1> given the infra we have today
15:29:51 <bswartz> manila should be lower volume than cinder
15:30:00 <bswartz> also we have less tests
15:30:02 <xyang1> yes
15:30:06 <bswartz> that's something I want to change, but that's a separate topic
15:30:18 <bswartz> it sounds like nobody has anything else
15:30:52 <bswartz> thanks all
15:30:57 <rushil> thanks
15:30:57 <vponomaryov> thanks
15:30:59 <xyang1> thanks
15:31:02 <bswartz> #endmeeting