15:00:18 #startmeeting manila 15:00:19 Meeting started Thu Jan 29 15:00:18 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:22 The meeting name has been set to 'manila' 15:00:29 hey guys 15:00:33 hi 15:00:34 hello 15:00:35 hi 15:00:42 hi 15:00:46 hi 15:00:48 so I don't have an agenda prepared for today 15:01:01 because I'm in austin at the cinder meetup 15:01:13 but there's a few things I'd like to talk about 15:01:16 Hi 15:01:21 so I'm going to make up the agenda as I go 15:01:22 hi 15:01:34 breaking news: "generic driver is broken due to bug in Nova" 15:01:47 O_O 15:01:49 #topic midcycle meetup 15:02:03 vponomaryov: okay let's fix that 15:02:31 we can talk about that one after this one 15:02:59 so last week there was some interest from various folks to attend a manila meetup in RTP in person 15:03:14 however everyone I've talked to has said they can't make it 15:03:31 is there anyone who is still interested in attending in person? 15:04:06 I proposed times on both the ML and the etherpad 15:04:26 nobody has objected to those times so I'd like to lock those in 15:04:42 we can proceed under the assumption that everyone will be joining remotely 15:04:56 I saw some suggestions for agenda items on the etherpad already which is great 15:05:05 I'll be putting my own suggestions there soon 15:05:19 please, provide a link 15:05:25 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-kilo-midcycle-meetup 15:05:28 thanks 15:06:20 if anyone does plan to attend in person, PLEASE CONTACT ME by email 15:07:39 the planned dates are feb 11 and 12 which are just 2 weeks away 15:07:55 by next week I hope to have the agenda filled up 15:08:18 just a reminder: the morning and afternoon sessions will probably have overlapping content to accommodate for people joining from different timezones 15:08:29 any quesitons about that? 15:08:56 time dedication to topics? 15:09:33 like one topic - 15 minutes or similar 15:09:34 vponomaryov: we'll see how much we have to discuss 15:09:42 then split up the time 15:10:10 The purpose of the meetup is to benefit you guys 15:10:57 and if there's no enough to talk about then I'll take advantage of the time to pull you all into code reviews and bugfixing for K-3 15:11:01 hehe 15:11:16 okay 15:11:30 #topic nova bug affecting generic driver 15:11:37 bug in manila: #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1415770 15:11:40 vponomaryov: what is there to say about this topic? 15:11:41 bug in nova: #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1415835 15:11:47 Temporary fix into Manila: 15:11:48 gerrit: #link https://review.openstack.org/151217 15:12:02 Nova shoots in its own leg trying boot Vm with Neutron port 15:12:17 since today 15:12:44 did you talk to any nova guys about this? 15:13:06 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151184/ 15:13:07 what's the likelihood it will be fixed there soon? 15:13:21 bswartz: it depends 15:13:31 but not only Manila is broken 15:13:35 rally project is broken too 15:13:38 we are not alone 15:14:40 I guess soon, because it is really critical 15:14:57 well is the fix you proposed something we shouldn't merge if they fix their bug soon? 15:15:29 bswartz: we do not have tempets covered until NOva bug is fixed 15:15:39 s/covered/coverage/ 15:15:55 oh I just reviewed the fix 15:16:06 okay this is a fine temporary workaround 15:16:21 thanks vponomaryov 15:16:25 #topic dev status 15:16:46 Dev status: 15:16:50 1) New Neutron network plugin that uses only one preconfigured net/subnet 15:16:56 BP: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/neutron-single-network-plugin 15:17:00 gerrit: #link https://review.openstack.org/150460 15:17:05 status: merged 15:17:14 2) New standalone network plugin 15:17:18 BP: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/standalone-network-plugin 15:17:21 status: work in progress 15:17:31 3) Manage/unmanage shares 15:17:35 BP: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/manage-shares 15:17:39 gerrit: #link https://review.openstack.org/147495 15:17:42 status: finished, ready for review 15:17:51 4) Single_svm mode for Generic driver 15:17:55 BP: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/single-svm-mode-for-generic-driver 15:17:59 gerrit: #link https://review.openstack.org/142403 15:17:59 status: finished, ready for review 15:18:05 5) Share access levels 'ro' and 'rw' 15:18:08 BP: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/level-of-access-for-shares 15:18:13 gerrit: 15:18:13 - client #link https://review.openstack.org/144298 15:18:13 - server #link https://review.openstack.org/144617 15:18:13 status: finished, ready for review 15:18:23 6) level of visibility for shares 15:18:26 BP: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/level-of-visibility-for-shares 15:18:30 gerrit: #link https://review.openstack.org/148853 15:18:38 status: work in progress 15:18:44 that's the main 15:19:27 rushil: where are we with share-types? 15:20:52 hmm 15:20:52 okay 15:21:00 #topic k-2 milestone 15:21:14 #link https://launchpad.net/manila/+milestone/kilo-2 15:21:32 okay I'm going to kick out anything that I can't get a response for 15:22:06 csaba: what is the status of gateway-mediated-with-ganesha 15:22:24 it's old and has -1 from jenkins 15:22:55 dynamic-storage-pools I know is ready 15:23:09 single-svm-mode-for-generic-driver is ready 15:23:21 bswartz: we will submit patch soon 15:23:21 generic-driver-single-svm-ci-job -- is this ready? 15:23:34 bswartz: yes 15:23:36 rraja can tell the details 15:23:40 csaba: can it be done for k2? 15:23:51 we only have a week 2 review and merge it 15:23:57 s/2/to/ 15:24:18 bswartz: yes 15:24:28 csaba: I'd rather push it to k3 unless it's going to be a quick an easy review 15:25:06 level-of-access-for-shares is ready 15:25:31 bswartz: yes it is quick and easy review. the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124637/ should be up in a couple of days. 15:25:31 bswartz: when do you need to decide? 15:25:38 netapp-driver-factory and netapp-driver-tracing are ready 15:25:55 bswartz: i ran into couple of bugs in SSHPool and ganesha config options registry 15:25:59 rraja: it needed to be submitted 5 days ago for k2, technically 15:26:09 a few more days is too late 15:26:11 bswartz: i've fixed those bugs. 15:27:03 bswartz: OK. 15:27:12 it's high priority so I'll give it 24 hours to show up 15:27:18 tomorrow morning I'll boot it out 15:28:12 bswartz: i have a question on updating requirements.txt 15:28:17 enhance-share-manager -- this doesn't look ready 15:28:21 bswartz: ganesha bugs also affects GPFS Share driver. so hopefully at least that fix can go in, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151112/ 15:28:27 jasonsb: let me get through the bp list forst 15:28:39 rraja: we can cover bugs too 15:28:51 right 15:28:59 vponomaryov: what's with enhance-share-manager 15:29:12 bswartz: no one works on it 15:29:19 okay I'll retarget 15:29:45 hp3par-manila-driver 15:29:52 this has a bunch of -1 15:30:00 fixes are ready except 15:30:07 adding share-from-snap 15:30:21 was planning that for later, but review asked for it 15:30:25 markstur_: okay just know that k-2 is a few days away 15:30:30 yeah 15:30:39 please be responsive to review comments to increase chance of getting merged 15:31:02 hitachi-sop-manila-driver 15:31:05 I can push fixes up today, but may have to do snapshare separate 15:31:30 jasonsb: is your driver going to support snapshots? 15:31:39 1 easy fix and test coverage to go 15:31:50 vponomaryov: no. no snapshots for this 15:31:53 jasonsb: jenkins doesn't lke your patch 15:32:06 how to best update requirements.txt? 15:32:15 jasonsb: just do it =) 15:32:17 would like to pull from global-requirements into requirements 15:32:46 it should be done separately from driver? 15:32:46 does global requirements overwrite our requirements, or can we add non-global requirements? 15:32:51 that's something I haen't tried 15:33:00 what is the guideline when driver does not support snapshots? prevent error or throw error in method? shouldn't there be an option in [manila] in tempest for this? 15:33:09 global requirements has the thing i need so i think this is easy 15:33:09 bswartz: "global" is word from requirements projects 15:33:31 ganso_: drivers are supposed to support snapshots, even if the implementation is not efficient or pretty 15:33:35 jasonsb: itis ok to add it in commit with driver and before 15:33:46 if driver is first who starts using it 15:33:56 vponomaryov: ok will do 15:33:58 bswartz: so a driver without snapshot cannot be accepted? 15:34:10 ganso_: talk to me about it offline 15:34:17 I want to know why it can't be supported 15:34:19 bswartz: we already have such drivers 15:34:32 csaba, rraja: right? 15:34:34 vponomaryov: we do make exceptions 15:34:48 but only for good reasons 15:35:01 underlying platform doesn't support snapshots at present 15:35:06 vponomaryov: yeah 15:35:22 it's bad to have backends that can't meet minimum functionality 15:35:45 we'll need to document which drivers have limitations and try to figure out how to fix them 15:36:04 bswartz: ok I will talk to you later about this 15:36:20 My intent is to start implement CI systems similar to what cinder has done 15:36:32 and drivers without snapshots won't pass those tests 15:36:44 that's a discussion for L though 15:37:03 bswartz: am i ok for present? 15:37:22 let's talk offline 15:37:29 ok 15:37:36 keep working on getting the driver to pass jenkins though 15:37:48 and pass reviewers too =) 15:37:51 and we'll do code reviews to try to get it mergable in parallel 15:38:03 i'll post an update with requirements.txt to get a jenkins run 15:38:35 vponomaryov: :) 15:38:38 it's not the end of the world if a driver slips to k-3, but if we have too many that limits our ability to focus on features and bugfixes 15:39:02 netapp-cdot-driver-extension 15:39:10 this one has been sitting around for a while 15:39:34 oh but it's getting worked on still 15:39:38 I'll give it another pass 15:39:47 okay BUGS 15:39:54 we have a bunch with no assignee 15:40:58 I see several netapp ones 15:41:07 can someone from netapp pick these up? 15:41:20 bswartz: I can triage 15:41:24 ty 15:42:04 anyone working on a bug that's not targetted at k2? 15:42:25 I'm going to focus my reviews on k2-targetteed stuff only 15:42:39 going from high priority to low 15:43:12 bswartz: yes, working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1415602 15:43:48 okay 15:44:08 so again I'll plead with all of you to focus on reviews this coming week 15:44:20 and if you have stuff being reviews, respond quickly 15:44:32 reviewed 15:44:42 * bswartz is typing on a crummy laptop keyboard 15:45:00 I have a good feeling about k2 15:45:11 but there a lot left to finish and not a lot of time 15:45:29 #topic open discussion 15:45:34 that's all I have 15:45:41 anyone have another topic to discuss today? 15:46:28 okay I think we're done 15:46:44 can we discuss snapshot now? 15:46:48 ganso_ and jasonsb: grab me today or tomorrow and we can talk about snapshots 15:46:49 any updates on mid-cycle plans? 15:47:14 timcl: its looking like it will be all virtual 15:47:26 but the dates are good, so we can lock them in 15:47:34 ok just wanted to make sure if there were people planning to travel 15:47:44 so far nobody is planning travel 15:47:52 to be fair we didn't give much advance notice 15:47:59 next time we can fix that 15:48:31 timcl: I'll let you know if that changes 15:48:54 thanks all! 15:49:09 #endmeeting