15:00:49 #startmeeting manila 15:00:51 Meeting started Thu Feb 7 15:00:49 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tbarron. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:54 The meeting name has been set to 'manila' 15:00:57 ping ganso 15:00:58 o/ 15:01:01 o/ 15:01:03 hello 15:01:21 ping bswartz 15:01:25 ping amito 15:01:29 ping toabctl 15:01:36 Hello 15:01:38 ping xyang 15:01:50 .o/ 15:01:54 ping erlon 15:01:58 ping tpsilva 15:02:21 Hi all! 15:02:39 #topic Announcements 15:03:03 I don't really have any except schedule stuff, which is our next topic. 15:03:10 Anyone else have some? 15:03:22 3 15:03:28 2 15:03:30 hey o/ 15:03:51 * tbarron pretends not to notice amito coming in 15:03:53 1 15:04:01 #topic Schedule reminders 15:04:03 #LINK https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings 15:04:11 Only 3 minutes late isn't terrible 15:04:17 gouthamr: thanks! 15:04:28 sorry :P 15:04:40 bswartz: and he's usually driving home about now too ... 15:04:52 amito: not a problem, I'm just messing with you 15:05:16 so as a reminder, here is the Stein schedule: 15:05:30 #link https://releases.openstack.org/stein/schedule.html 15:05:49 Of note: feature proposal freeze is 21 February. 15:06:26 code for new features should be posted in gerrit with unit tests passing 15:06:47 Then Feature Freeze and client library freeze are 7 March. 15:07:22 There is no guarantee that your feature will be merged just because you make these deadlines, but if you don't 15:07:27 well you know the rest. 15:07:46 And as I was discussing with some folks earlier in #openstack-manila, your 15:07:58 odds are better if you can get review eyeballs early. 15:08:17 Put your work up, get review eyeballs on it early. 15:08:34 Ideally break it into relatively managable reviews. 15:09:22 We don't have a lot of reviewer bandwidth so if you wait till deadlines and drop one huge review then it's tougher to get the job done. 15:09:33 questions? comments? 15:10:10 Also please remember that reciprocity makes openstack go around. 15:10:31 When you *do* reviews people want to review your own submissions. 15:10:31 hi 15:10:39 toabctl: Hi! 15:10:56 k, nuf said I guess 15:11:07 #topic Bugs 15:11:26 jgrosso is on PTO today but I want to call attention to an email 15:11:37 he sent to #openstack-discuss recently 15:11:58 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002404.html 15:12:41 We're lucky to have a bug czar who brings brand new energy and "beginner's mind" to our bug backlog 15:12:55 Please read this email and respond. 15:13:18 gouthamr: I see you replied already and I know you worked a little bit 15:13:20 :) 15:13:27 with jgrosso on this 15:13:35 What is the purpose of the discuss ML? 15:13:39 I don't subscribe to it 15:13:41 do you have anything to say? 15:13:49 bswartz: it is everything now! 15:13:55 no more dev list 15:13:56 bswartz, discuss is the replacement of dev 15:14:01 Oh... 15:14:06 * bswartz missed the memo 15:14:08 it replaces dev, ops, etc. 15:14:19 bswartz, there is *only* discuss now. no dev, no ops, no docs, no infa, ... 15:14:26 * tbarron reminds himself to cover changes like that in this meeting 15:14:30 Did my subscription automatically migrate over? 15:14:34 no 15:14:58 Ok 15:15:00 * gouthamr slaps bswartz with a large trout 15:15:07 \m/ 15:15:08 bswartz: we forgot to tell fungi to ping you about it personally on irc b/c you have too much email to read it 15:15:09 * bswartz sticks tongue out at gouthamr 15:15:42 Okay cool 15:16:12 gouthamr: did you have anything you wanted to say about the email thread or should we just carry forward 15:16:23 this topic to next week's meeting 15:17:16 tbarron: nothing more 15:17:21 gouthamr: k 15:17:32 tbarron: we can discuss the initial bug triage when jason's around 15:17:47 #topic tracking our work 15:17:57 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/SteinCycle 15:18:05 please take a look 15:18:32 First section is work associated with approved specs for stein 15:18:34 tbarron: bswartz: i sent numerous announcements to the old dev ml before it was eventually deleted 15:18:41 over the course of months 15:18:47 fungi: we know :) 15:19:11 fungi: sorry to raise you -- we were just giving some folks @#$@4 for not knowing 15:19:30 okay, just making sure. if anyone has ideas for how to more effectively reach subscribers of a mailing list rather than sending e-mail to that mailing list, i'm interested to hear them ;) 15:19:48 er, other than 15:19:52 fungi: people will suggest #slack :) 15:20:12 or worse 15:20:20 touché 15:20:41 fungi: the zorillas aren't really complaining 15:20:53 fungi: if it didn't say [manila] it was autodeleted -- my fault for aggressive filtering 15:21:04 ok, back on topic 15:21:14 no worries 15:21:31 I've marked each of the work items associated with approved specs red, yellow, or green. 15:22:07 depening on whether they are likely not to make it in this cycle, in the middle, or in good shape 15:22:32 If you disagree with any of these markers let me know! 15:23:02 tbarron: can one item that is already yellow become green? :) 15:23:17 What does the yellow in the py3 section indicate? 15:23:20 ganso: yes, it can, when it's ready 15:23:34 bswartz: that we've done some of the work but not enough 15:23:50 Please not slack for openstack. Slack is terrible 15:24:07 bswartz: I want us to get the lvm job and some of the dhss=true jobs with real back ends running tempest with py3 15:24:19 otherwise I don't think we have sufficient coverage 15:24:41 Also I haven't heard that any of the third party jobs are running with py3 15:24:48 And grenade is still py2 15:24:58 bswartz: make sense? 15:24:58 ganso: are we moving our CI to py3? 15:25:13 bswartz: we are in progress of moving 15:25:24 ganso: that's good news 15:25:55 This is a wiki so I'm not supposed to be the only updater. 15:26:09 gouthamr just updated the active-active section with tasks 15:26:24 amito has promised an update to the sdk section 15:26:37 On systems I administer, python2 is symlinked to a shellscript that writes a message to syslog at level LOG_EMERG, lowers your disk quota by 10%, and runs python3 15:26:39 I posted an update yesterday 15:26:51 amito: awesome, thx 15:27:02 gouthamr updated the osc section 15:27:46 bswartz: :D haha, okay, i'd add a smug/sad smiley and also "P.S: you're what's wrong to the world" 15:27:51 vkmc - looks like you updated uwsgi and UI 15:28:12 e0ne: thanks for your help with UI testing ^^^ 15:28:32 tbarron: hi. you're welcome! 15:28:42 bswartz: that's awesome! 15:29:25 I'll mention also that the os-ansible folks are making good progress on a manila role there 15:29:36 first iteration will deploy manila with lvm back end 15:31:06 Lots of these areas have owner/coordinators who have defined some tasks to do but 15:31:21 that does not mean they are doing the whole thing themselves. 15:31:41 So if you have any interest in helping even with a small piece please do step up. 15:32:06 That's all I have on this one today. Anyone else? 15:32:23 tbarron: FYI, I failed to setup tls proxy with manila on gates, so I disabled it in my patch 15:32:50 e0ne: kk 15:33:01 e0ne: one step at a time :) 15:33:07 :) 15:33:38 What's tlsproxy for? 15:33:38 e0ne: do you want to briefly tell folks what your change does? or if you are busy with midcycle that's ok too 15:34:06 bswartz: it's to enable ssl/https for endpoints 15:34:26 I pushed small patch to test manila-ui with the current horizon 15:34:35 Oh you mean do the HTTPS stuff outside of the server? 15:34:38 Ok 15:34:54 the jobs setups devstack environment with manila and manila-ui 15:35:14 I added a few simple tests to verify that manila ui could be opend 15:35:34 these tests are based on horizon selenium integration tests 15:35:55 it's up to you if you want to add more tests 15:35:55 should help us with issues like those we had b/c our plugin was using private unstable "interfaces" (not) in horizon and we broke 15:36:24 right now its the gate and the horizon selenium suite, right? 15:36:40 tbarron: I'll add this job to horizon experimental queue letter 15:36:51 vkmc_: correct 15:36:53 e0ne: nice, thanks 15:37:06 cool 15:37:18 so, it will be some kind of verification that plugins are working with a current horizon 15:37:38 #link https://review.openstack.org/635112 15:39:09 e0ne: thanks again! 15:39:39 we have quite a bit of work to do with our plugin, it's quite behind the api and the client on microversions 15:39:53 and we need to build on what e0ne has put in place 15:40:08 e0ne++ 15:40:28 so get your django liking friends over here, it's fun to be a zorilla! 15:40:48 I think we're ready for 15:40:54 #topic Open discussion 15:41:36 talkative bunch today ... 15:42:11 OK, let's pick up here again next week. Thanks everyone! 15:42:15 #endmeeting