15:00:52 #startmeeting manila 15:00:53 Meeting started Thu May 13 15:00:52 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gouthamr. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:57 The meeting name has been set to 'manila' 15:01:01 o/ 15:01:01 o/ 15:01:02 o/ 15:01:04 hi 15:01:07 o/ 15:01:09 o/ 15:01:27 courtesy ping: ganso vkmc tbarron 15:01:45 hello folks o/ 15:02:04 Hi 15:02:19 thanks for joining, lets get started 15:02:23 #topic Announcements 15:03:12 been a slow week, no major announcements 15:03:18 we're a couple of weeks away from M-1 15:03:53 please ensure bugs/blueprints targeted to m-1 and assigned to you are ack'ed 15:04:00 o/ 15:04:07 o/ haixin 15:04:12 any other announcements? 15:05:13 #topic stable/train to EM 15:05:55 gouthamr: I just added that one since it seemed worth getting the team's thinking ... 15:06:10 ack, ty tbarron 15:06:25 the stable maintenance team is trying to transition stable/train to EM - a phase where we'll no longer produce releases 15:06:30 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022287.html 15:06:36 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/790754 15:06:54 we've several open changes 15:06:56 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+status:open+branch:stable/train 15:07:16 none in manila-ui or python-manilaclient 15:08:14 CI failed on all of these patches, however, the failure isn't related to these patches but to the test infra 15:09:21 we've an option to approve the final release to be made with code that's merged 15:09:56 " After the transition stable/train will be still open for bug fixes, 15:09:56 > but there won't be any official releases." 15:10:50 +1 15:11:33 do we think any of these open changes _must_ be in the release? 15:13:48 okay, hearing no objections on the release then.. 15:14:01 well I think distributions (red hat, inspur, etc.) will likely just cherry-pick any must have fixes anyways at this point 15:14:14 +1 15:14:23 and upstream train users could do the same really 15:15:01 I guess there is some of the changes in the list that could be useful to have... 15:15:32 i.e. Fix manila OverQuota issue while managing shares 15:16:21 certainly - still want to pursue these to closure 15:16:35 Yes, so we should still merge these. The question is whether they need to be in a "release." 15:17:45 I was thinking it's OK if they are not, but I want to make sure that if there are reasons that we should hold up the final EM release and make sure they are in *first* that those come out in the conversation here. 15:18:39 i've recheck'ed an old CI fix change: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/773188 15:19:05 ah, so we might be able to merge these near term then 15:19:46 if that fixes the issue, we can approve the blocked changes, but we don't need to hold up the release for this.. 15:20:05 +1 15:20:32 alright 15:21:52 #agreed ship stable/train with merged changes as of 13 May 21, follow up open stable/train branch changes by fixing up CI 15:22:34 no further new topics for today 15:22:43 #topic Bug Triage (vhari) 15:23:19 vhari isn't here today but has put the untriaged list together for us - lemme do the round up 15:23:32 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug Triage etherpad) 15:23:45 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1928241 15:23:45 Launchpad bug 1928241 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "NetApp driver DHSS mode fails to create share on a new added pool" [Undecided,New] 15:24:54 this bug feels like deja vu 15:25:29 * vkmc sneaks in 15:26:17 felipe_rodrigues: so can the driver check assigned aggregates on the vserver in the driver call to choose compatible backends? 15:26:17 * tbarron pretends he didn't notice 15:27:07 yeah.. that would be the solution 15:27:09 * gouthamr slides aside in the last bench, shares a cookie with vkmc - what's the gossip in the hallway? 15:27:24 xD 15:27:53 felipe_rodrigues: awesome, makes sense.. 15:28:09 lets triage this, will you be owning this bug? 15:28:24 yeah 15:28:39 I can do it 15:30:51 ty, think this can be a "low" - you don't see new aggregates added (or the aggr search pattern change) very often 15:30:58 but annoying when it happens 15:31:18 +1 15:31:23 felipe_rodrigues: target to xena-1 or 2? 15:31:39 2 15:31:59 ty, done 15:32:09 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1928055 15:32:09 Launchpad bug 1928055 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "[DOC] Response code of share snapshot creation is incorrect" [Undecided,New] 15:32:46 oh, good find 15:33:12 low-hanging-fruit too 15:35:35 #link https://opendev.org/openstack/manila/src/commit/896c88d6b7dd497ca56d4446e11cff060ea917d3/manila/api/v1/share_snapshots.py#L169-L170 15:36:11 if anyone's looking to fix this up, let me know 15:37:07 good first issue too, if you're onboarding someone 15:37:17 carloss ^ :) 15:38:17 yeah, for sure... I'd say it would be a good first patch for fabiooliveira :) 15:38:59 :) 15:39:06 I can work with him on this 15:39:07 awesome - you just got volun-told fabiooliveira 15:39:26 xD 15:40:07 XD 15:40:21 carloss: i'll let you adjust the bug priority, milestone - fabiooliveira, you can claim this bug by clicking the pen next to "Unassigned" and clicking "Assign me" 15:40:39 hey there paul from thefuture 15:40:52 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1927823 15:40:52 Launchpad bug 1927823 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "netapp driver should report home state to prevent scheduling on aggr not home" [Undecided,New] 15:41:24 oops, I guess I don't have such permissions yet 15:41:35 to set the milestones and such :) 15:42:16 Hi 15:42:34 oh, i'll fix that up carloss 15:43:34 ty :) 15:43:44 carloss: can you try now? 15:43:46 * tbarron had been wanting to say something like 'kiwi_36 is the future' and now he can 15:44:13 yes, now I'm able to 15:44:17 ty gouthamr 15:44:22 you're welcome 15:44:25 carloss++ 15:45:04 carloss: ^ regarding this bug - again something that shouldn't happen very often 15:45:43 its possible, like carthaca suggests, that the driver removes the pool from the manila scheduler 15:45:53 if it detects this state of maintenance 15:46:51 > regarding this bug - again something that shouldn't happen very often 15:46:51 +1 15:47:09 yeah, that would be a good solution 15:48:46 I can get someone to fix it, but I'd say priority is still low 15:48:58 awesome ty carloss, carthaca 15:49:27 carloss: set the milestone when you assign this 15:49:35 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1920937 15:49:35 Launchpad bug 1920937 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "Netapp non-disruptive migration of cifs shares export location broken" [Undecided,New] 15:49:44 oh boy, lots of netapp bugs today 15:49:51 xD 15:50:06 carloss will start day drinking at this rate 15:51:13 i'm surprised this wasn't caught in CI 15:52:12 me too... but we have had bugs with CIFS shares in the past for replication too, because we were always trying to create them even when there was no need to 15:52:50 hum, there is no migration tests enabled with CIFS there, iirc 15:53:15 carloss: so a similar fix may be needed here .. 15:53:32 dviroel: not even API? 15:53:46 scenario tests are still nfs-only 15:53:51 no 15:53:54 (which we should fix some day) 15:54:00 that's bad :/ 15:54:20 we need to test migration in our CI for CIFS as well 15:54:21 because upstream tempest tests don't consider netapp limitation on migrating within the same share server 15:54:23 another action item :) 15:55:02 and the test can fail depending on the destination pool 15:55:21 but netapp has an internal migration test, that filters compatible pools 15:55:29 but isn't enable for CIFS 15:55:45 there is no CIFS + internal enabled, iirc 15:56:33 i see 15:56:47 you're correct, dviroel... just confirmed that in some reports 15:56:56 dviroel: do you know if we have a tracker for "upstream tempest tests don't consider netapp limitation on migrating within the same share server" 15:57:32 don't know 15:57:37 i vaguely recall something along these lines, but i thought the tests don't care about backends - they'll just find a compatible pool 15:58:12 yep, and migration doesn't have a compatibility check, like share server migration has 15:58:47 check-only 15:58:56 ack 15:59:12 okay, carloss i'll follow up with you about triaging this bug 15:59:20 ack 15:59:33 lets wrap up 15:59:37 #topic Open Discussion 15:59:43 ^ barely a minute 15:59:58 but if you want to register something in the meeting minutes, now's your chance 16:00:35 if not, Eid Mubarak to those celebrating! thanks for joining the meeting today! 16:00:49 see you on #openstack-manila, and here next week 16:00:51 #endmeeting