15:00:39 #startmeeting manila 15:00:40 Meeting started Thu Jun 3 15:00:39 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is carloss. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:43 The meeting name has been set to 'manila' 15:01:07 Hi!! 15:01:10 o/ 15:01:16 courtesy ping ganso vkmc carloss felipe_rodrigues ecsantos vhari 15:01:24 o/ 15:01:39 o/ 15:02:25 Hello everyone :) 15:02:42 We seem to have a smaller crowd today 15:03:20 So gouthamr is on PTO today, and we will be running the manila meeting on his absence 15:03:31 * carloss promised gouthamr we will behave on his absence xD 15:03:57 #topic Announcements 15:04:07 heh, don't make promises you can't keep 15:04:15 haha, true tbarron 15:04:32 but out of respect for carloss .... 15:04:52 :D 15:04:53 Where we are at the Xena release 15:05:06 python-manila client Xena-1 was released yesterday 15:05:11 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/792935 15:05:38 Thank you all for making the effort to merge changes... 15:06:01 I'd also like to mention that we are 3 weeks away from the spec freeze 15:06:35 * vkmc starts making noise 15:06:36 So it's encouraged for reviewers to review the proposed specs and if you want to submit your spec, there is some time to do so :) 15:07:05 :) 15:07:31 I'd say that's all release-wise :D 15:07:33 And another exciting announcement is our bugsquash, that is scheduled to happen during the next week... 15:08:08 We have a list of bugs to work on during this event and it is available here: 15:08:20 #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/i3vwocrkk776 15:08:33 vhari is out today but she's been busy making lists 15:09:17 sure thing tbarron :) 15:09:27 If you have another bug that is not in the list and you want to work on it during the event, please add it to the list 15:10:07 The bugsquash going to start in the next monday (June 7th) and we'll be focusing on the bugs of that list until the end of the next week... 15:10:34 During the event, we intend to have collaborative reviews... 15:10:57 This is a good opportunity for new contributors and also the older ones... 15:11:22 If you want to be featured, please ping gouthamr :) 15:11:50 As vhari stated in the announcement email, we'll be using the time slot of the next manila weekly meeting for the event 15:12:15 So the regular manila IRC meeting will be cancelled and we will take part in the bugsquash 15:13:03 Thank you vhari for putting things together for this and organizing this event :) 15:13:39 vhari++ 15:14:12 Does anyone else have an announcement? 15:14:27 just a note on that event, we were discussing about doing the regular bug squash activity plus a review step by step on another day, so we can learn review how-tos 15:15:10 we were thinking on something like... monday (this slot), for the bug squash session 15:15:20 and thursday (this slot), for the review demo 15:15:26 how does that sound? 15:15:58 +1 15:15:59 I can send a follow up email with those deets, if you all agree 15:15:59 sounds great 15:16:11 +1 15:16:38 cool :) 15:17:26 awesome... thank you vkmc 15:18:55 http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022722.html - btw, more details about the bugsquase are available here :) 15:19:17 alright, moving on... 15:19:19 #topic Reviews needing attention 15:19:40 So we have our etherpad with a list of reviews that need some attention... 15:19:49 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-xena-review-focus 15:20:16 If you have some time to review some changes in that list, please go ahead :D 15:20:35 Also, if you want to add your change there, please do so 15:21:13 There are few items on the list, but I bet it will grow as the release cycle goes :) 15:22:25 #topic State of the CI 15:23:09 So, as we know, our CI was having a bunch of failures in the stable branches and it was broken for a couple of time 15:23:48 Here is a link with some more details on the breakages, as well as a reference to the changes that addressed the failures 15:24:02 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-ci-issues (Manila CI issues) 15:25:17 As the CI is healthier now, we managed to merge a couple of changes that were stuck for some time 15:25:56 Special thank you to gouthamr for working on the changes to fix the CI 15:26:29 And also, thank you to the reviewers of those changes :) 15:28:42 ++ good job on fixing the ci 15:29:57 Alright, that's all I had for the state of the CI 15:30:00 moving on... 15:30:09 #topic Bug Triage 15:30:48 vhari is not here with us today, but again, managed to put together the list of bugs for this week :D 15:30:53 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug Triage etherpad) 15:31:36 so, first on the list: 15:31:37 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1930459 15:31:39 Launchpad bug 1930459 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "CephFS drivers: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' (pybind/ceph_argparse)" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Victoria Martinez de la Cruz (vkmc) 15:32:24 quick summary on that... a couple of days ago josecastroleon and feralcoder spotted a defect in our cephfs drivers 15:32:46 the issue is with manila wallaby and ceph nautilus 15:32:58 we are missing a minor backport to nautilus, the ceph team is working on that 15:33:08 in case we cannot get that backport on time, I proposed a workaround 15:33:34 I'm working on addressing a few comments on the submitted patch 15:33:38 hope to get this merged this week 15:33:51 so... it's in progress and it's confirmed 15:34:39 thank you for explaining, vkmc 15:34:54 so, importance for this would be a Medium? 15:36:14 * gouthamr slides in 15:36:18 +1 15:36:26 +1 15:36:46 Medium, Xena-2 :) 15:36:55 awesome 15:37:37 alright, next on the list: 15:37:43 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1929121 15:37:44 Launchpad bug 1929121 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "Filtering shares by extra-specs provides wrong results" [Undecided,New] 15:38:11 Thank you gouthamr for reporting this bug 15:38:28 I'd say this has been up for a while and wasn't being catched by our unit tests... 15:38:50 gouthamr, !!! 15:38:51 but in summary: we allow people to filter shares based on their extra-specs, but the filters aren't working as they should 15:38:52 fix seems simple too; a bugsquash candidate for new contributors among us? :) 15:39:35 yeah, seems like a good bugsquash candidate 15:40:21 So, IMO this would be a low... wdyt? 15:40:42 Agree, we can add a low-hanging-fruit tag as well 15:40:56 yeah, so tag it as xena-2 as well? :) 15:42:01 Yep, any volunteers looking to pick this one up for next week’s bugsquash? 15:43:19 kafilat, archanaserver, ^ :D 15:43:40 Sure :) 15:43:46 yaay 15:43:50 \o/ 15:43:50 yes :) 15:43:50 thanks kafilat :) 15:44:05 archanaserver, we can get you a bug 15:44:34 as well 15:44:39 okay sure 15:44:45 great ++ :) there’s always enough around here 15:45:06 :) 15:45:32 alright, next on today's list... 15:45:39 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1929421 15:45:40 Launchpad bug 1929421 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "NetApp driver cannot configure thick provisioning with AFF platforms" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Nahim Alves de Souza (nahimsouza) 15:46:00 bug reported by felipe_rodrigues 15:46:25 a customer of ours has hit this recently... 15:46:31 tbarron noted a downstream support case for this one as well 15:46:45 oh, so the heat on this is growing 15:46:51 gouthamr sees all 15:46:54 oh :) 15:47:08 the good thing is: the fix is on the way :) 15:47:19 we have nahimsouza working on this 15:47:29 * gouthamr inserts meme *always thick provision so you can sell more storage boxes* 15:47:42 haha 15:47:54 lol 15:48:15 hahaha 15:49:04 so, I'd say we can target this for Xena-2, but I'm unsure if medium sounds right for this 15:50:14 thoughts? 15:50:53 carloss: are you thinking higher or lower? 15:51:09 I was thinking maybe lower 15:51:18 space guarantee may be a regulatory necessity; the workaround would be to modify the share externally via NetApp’s CLI/API/UI - so a low sounds appropriate - how far back does this problem exist? 15:51:38 low seems right to me 15:52:27 i vote for medium :) 15:52:43 since there is no alternative to the user 15:52:58 and no visibility either 15:53:02 other then talking with the admin 15:53:04 +1 douglas 15:53:23 gouthamr: yes, it is a silent issue 15:54:08 yeah, sounds right 15:55:26 there are 3 votes for low and 2 for medium? 15:55:55 I'm changing mine to medium 15:55:58 :) no sounds like 3 on 3 - we got to take this to the grand jury 15:56:18 okay, we have a deserter 15:56:21 * tbarron recluses himself 15:56:30 :) 15:56:51 took money under the table and doesn't want it to get out 15:56:54 * vkmc gets popcorn 15:57:12 +1 for medium 15:57:48 that’s it, it’s like pulling out of AMC when it hit 30 :P 15:57:51 about how far it exists: By my git blames, I see it's been there since thin_provisioning is a thing for the NetApp driver 15:58:44 * tbarron goes to redistrict manila so the votes are always in his favor 15:58:56 thanks for checking carloss - okay with the medium; good thing the fix will be here soon 15:59:13 xD 15:59:17 but "it was just a typo" I didn't really try to keep pthers from voting 15:59:23 * gouthamr tbarronmandering 15:59:37 :) 15:59:39 alright, thank you for weighing on this :) 15:59:47 that's all we have on bugs for today 16:00:37 * carloss checks the time 16:00:55 I guess it's all we have for today's meeting 16:00:57 thank you all for joining! 16:00:59 thanks carloss o/ 16:01:01 thanks all! 16:01:05 #endmeeting