15:00:15 #startmeeting manila 15:00:15 Meeting started Thu Oct 6 15:00:15 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is vkmc. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'manila' 15:00:20 hi everyone o/ 15:00:38 courtesy ping: dviroel felipe_rodrigues ecsantos vhari gouthamr carloss 15:00:47 o/ 15:00:47 o/ 15:01:20 let's give people some minutes to join 15:01:45 o/ 15:02:02 o/ 15:03:21 ok, let's get started 15:03:25 #topic announcements 15:03:34 0/ 15:03:38 hi 15:03:43 #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html 15:03:54 first and foremost: zed release was yesterday 15:03:58 so congratulations everyone! 15:04:05 o/ 15:04:14 and thanks a lot for all your contributions during this cycle :) 15:04:31 o/ 15:04:35 o/ 15:04:38 just sharing some info of what we have accomplished 15:05:08 this is the 26th release of OpenStack, and it got over 710 contributors from 140 different organizations 15:05:26 this release is dedicated to the memory of Ilya Etingof 15:05:52 a lot of innovation happened for all the projects 15:05:55 including ours 15:06:06 you can get more details in the zed release page 15:06:10 #link https://www.openstack.org/software/zed/ 15:06:33 also, you can hear the PTL updates from today's OpenInfra live episode 15:06:38 #link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSbB3L9_MeY 15:06:45 especial shoutout to the manila updates that our PTL ccarlos gave :) 15:07:19 carloss++ :) 15:07:34 carloss++ 15:07:41 so cool to see us so well represented! 15:07:50 and to see all the great things we have accomplished together 15:07:53 zorillas++ <3 15:07:55 carloss++ \o/ 15:08:43 carloss++ 15:09:43 carloss++ 15:10:17 all right folks, let's move to the next topic now 15:10:25 which is 15:10:30 continue doing awesome stuff 15:10:38 #link https://openinfra.dev/ptg/ 15:10:51 we have our next PTG coming in less than two weeks 15:11:04 if you haven't registered, please do so in the link shared above 15:11:12 if you have registered already, you are all set 15:11:29 and the focus right now is on the planning for the PTG itself 15:11:49 don't miss the opportunity to add topics you want to discuss in the agenda 15:11:54 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-ptg-manila-planning 15:12:07 I already added mine :) 15:12:37 any comment or question regarding the PTG? 15:14:38 when will the schedule be available? 15:15:46 ashrodri, good question! 15:15:57 I intend to have the slots sorted by Tuesday :D 15:16:04 the slots schedule is already available 15:16:08 you can get more details here 15:16:11 #link https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html 15:16:44 vkmc++ 15:16:51 about the schedule for the topics for manila ptg itself 15:17:07 we will have a clearer view of how we are going to organize topics for next week :) 15:17:31 excellent! thanks 15:17:35 anytime! 15:17:40 all right 15:18:04 for those that didn't have questions, maybe you didn't have questions *right now*... but if you think about something, don't hesitate on pinging us in the #openstack-manila channel 15:18:19 so, with that, let's move to our next topic 15:18:29 #topic review focus 15:18:35 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-zorilla-review-focus 15:19:20 * vkmc double checks the link 15:19:29 for some reason shows empty to me, maybe I have the link wrong? 15:19:46 I think two days ago I saw that it was empty and I reverted 15:19:53 I think everything got erased again :( 15:19:57 it is empty here. 15:20:04 boo 15:20:14 so there must be history there... let's see if we can get to the last revision 15:20:37 (thanks to whoever did that) 15:20:37 yes 15:20:40 now we have an etherpad! 15:20:40 :D 15:20:42 I think I managed to revert 15:20:43 :D 15:20:58 nice, thanks carloss 15:21:39 oh, nice - we’re continuing the “Zorilla” etherpad? 😛 15:21:51 zorilla > antelope 15:22:01 haha, we will get the antelope one soon :p 15:22:05 antelopes are amazing creatures but zorillas are just the best 15:22:06 haha 15:22:11 this is the last zorilla official week 15:22:17 * vkmc sad panda 15:22:47 ok, let's check out some of the changes that need attention 15:23:19 support share transfer between projects 15:23:41 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/843832 15:23:55 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/854312 15:24:01 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/858351 15:25:36 I see a couple reviewers involved, but more help is needed 15:27:43 the next one we have on the list is 15:27:43 yes - the idea is to get this merged earlier in this cycle 15:27:52 so more eyes are appreciated 15:27:59 ok carloss :) 15:28:00 haixin - thanks for submitting the manila-tempest-plugin tests! 15:28:08 :) 15:28:43 maybe for this one, being a quite big patch, we could have a pair review session as we did with some big changes in the past 15:29:24 let's give it some love this week, and if we are stuck, we can discuss on the PTG 15:29:34 ok, now moving to the next one 15:29:49 (thanks haixin for the work on this change) 15:29:58 metadata API 15:30:23 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/827925 15:30:41 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/803424 15:30:49 seems CI is failing for the tempest change 15:31:04 and the python-manilaclient one has some comments that needs to be addressed 15:31:20 but seems is getting good attention 15:31:56 ah yes, it was a pep8 issue. waiting for the new run to complete. and im dedicating some time later today to address comments and work on the client patch, thanks for the reviews! 15:33:05 great, thanks ashrodri 15:33:15 ok, the next one then 15:33:23 admin API to query quotas on a project 15:33:37 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/807780 15:33:44 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/807781 15:34:21 for that one... seems it almost get merged for zed 15:34:30 but there were still some comments that were not addressed 15:34:42 and seems authors are working on addressing those 15:35:14 that for the manila core change, and also the same case for python-manilaclient change 15:35:35 so perhaps we can revisit next week to see if there are updates on those :) 15:35:41 yes - we needed to wait to complete it in Antelope because it bumps the API microversion 15:35:47 ++ 15:36:16 ahh makes sense 15:36:18 ok :) 15:36:25 so another candidate for early this cycle 15:36:57 perfect 15:37:09 moving to the next change 15:37:16 add "share-network" option for replica create API 15:37:33 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/804589 15:39:02 latest update on this is that all the related changes got merged already 15:39:20 the CI is passing for the tempest change 15:39:27 is missing reviews 15:39:33 so, a good one to check out 15:39:42 should good to get in for early this cycle 15:40:14 cool! 15:40:17 the next one then 15:40:23 manila oversubscription enhancements 15:40:39 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/838440 15:40:42 this one is a spec 15:40:58 it didn't make it into zed, so it might be a good candidate to get in antelope 15:41:05 it already has a +1 15:41:19 there are other comments that needs to be addressed 15:41:36 maybe, if the author agrees, we can give it some discussion in the PTG 15:42:25 ++ 15:42:53 ok, the next one 15:43:28 share backup spec review 15:43:39 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/330306 15:44:29 another spec we have pending 15:44:55 it has been recently restored 15:45:04 and scheduled to be discussed on the antelope PTG 15:45:29 so, seems we have a plan for this one 15:45:42 let's move directly to the next one 15:45:44 (and also the last one) 15:45:54 openstackSDK Support 15:46:09 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:openstacksdk-manila-support 15:46:20 there are a lot of changes related to it, so I will only link to the topic 15:46:43 some of them merged, so we need to update that list 15:46:49 I can do that after this meeting 15:46:58 and some others need owner 15:47:01 they are WIP 15:47:20 so, if you are looking for a nice task to work on, feel free to grab those in the WIP list :) 15:47:37 another good topic for the PTG probably 15:47:48 * carloss bbiab 15:47:56 ok, without further ado... let's move to the next section of our meeting 15:48:10 #topic bug triage (vhari) 15:48:15 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new 15:48:30 thanks vhari for working on that list 15:48:43 seems we have three bugs to look into today 15:48:50 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1991776 15:49:18 vkmc, yw, ack 2 new bugs to triage 15:49:29 this one is on the cephfs nfs driver 15:49:34 using hostname as mount URI cause warning log every minute 15:49:55 by reading the description... yes, is expected :) 15:49:58 I can take this one 15:50:17 it should be an easy fix 15:50:30 I'm gonna target it for antelope-1 15:50:32 * gouthamr wonders if we had an override var 15:50:46 to set the intended/supportable ip version 15:51:04 no no, we don't gouthamr 15:51:37 ah - we have a way for it in DHSS=True 15:51:55 I hit this with the new helper implementation 15:51:56 the idea would be to allow the administrator to set what is supportable 15:52:07 wyeah 15:52:34 we can have a discussion on the fix :) 15:52:49 thanks gouthamr 15:52:56 next one 15:52:59 another ceph one 15:53:02 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1991938 15:53:10 * carloss is back 15:53:56 vkmc: sure; thanks for picking it up 15:54:01 and this is interesting... because we don't officially support multi-fs 15:54:18 we only added the option for when we started the support for it 15:54:57 for this I don't have a quick answer... we would need to check what it takes to add support for this 15:55:38 maybe a good chat for the cephfs driver updates for the PTG 15:55:44 what do you think gouthamr? 15:56:34 looking at the template that "solved" the problem for Romain, it seems simple enough 15:57:01 and i like that this becomes easier with the ceph mgr interface 15:57:08 ++ 15:57:25 like you said, we have an option to support multiple filesystems (cephfs_filesystem_name) 15:57:33 so i suppose that they expected this to work 15:57:43 * gouthamr takes that back 15:57:46 well, it seems :) 15:57:54 we support configuring which filesystem the driver will use 15:58:03 when the deployment has multiple filesystems 15:58:13 yeah 15:58:41 so, yes, my confusion too... we have that option in case they want to use the same cluster to have multi-fs 15:58:48 and they can pick which fs to use with manila 15:59:12 ok, we can discuss later on this one 15:59:14 thanks gouthamr 15:59:16 last bug 15:59:17 they want to use the same ganesha instance across backends though 15:59:24 not a great idea if they want to scale 15:59:27 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1915094 15:59:48 that ones seems to be triaged 15:59:48 vkmc: i can own the last bug and update it 15:59:55 gouthamr, sounds good! 16:00:07 ok 16:00:11 gouthamr++ 16:00:15 yes https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1915094 could be a doc improvement opportunity 16:00:24 we are out of time 16:00:42 we couldn't have an open discussion today, but if anything comes up, join us on #openstack-manila 16:00:43 and with that 16:00:45 #endmeeting