15:01:03 <carloss> #startmeeting manila
15:01:03 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Feb 23 15:01:03 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carloss. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:03 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:03 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'manila'
15:01:10 <carthaca> hi
15:01:13 <haixin> o/
15:01:42 <carloss> courtesy ping: dviroel felipe_rodrigues vhari gouthamr
15:02:06 <gouthamr> o/
15:02:49 <nahimsouza[m]> o/
15:04:33 <HelenaDantas[m]> o/
15:04:44 <MatheusAndrade[m]> o/
15:04:57 <thiagoalvoravel> o/
15:05:04 <carloss> o/ hello everyone
15:05:11 <carloss> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_meeting
15:06:53 <carloss> today's meeting agenda
15:07:03 <carloss> first topic
15:07:06 <carloss> #topic Announcements
15:07:12 <carloss> Schedule and Deadlines:
15:07:51 <carloss> #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html (Antelope cycle schedule)
15:08:01 <carloss> we are one week past the feature freeze deadline
15:08:56 <carloss> feature freeze exceptions were granted in the previous week and the features are expected to be merged during this week
15:09:04 <carloss> (today)
15:09:20 <carloss> we'll go over the status of the features under feature freeze exception in a few
15:10:29 <carloss> next week is RC1 week
15:11:17 * dviroel o/
15:11:50 <carloss> also for announcements:
15:12:27 <carloss> we mentioned we'd start our bugsquash at the end of this week, but I think we can postpone it until next monday
15:13:24 <carloss> so we can land the changes that need to land this week and start fresh on the bugsquash, focusing on the bugs we want to close before rc1
15:13:42 <gouthamr> ++
15:13:53 <carloss> (also because many red hatters will be off tomorrow, so we'd have a reduced crowd)
15:14:47 <carloss> so we would have the bugsqush from Feb 27th to Mar 1st
15:15:10 <felipe_rodrigues> +1  postpone
15:16:50 <carloss> I'll be sending an email with more information today/tomorrow
15:17:23 <carloss> that's all I had for announcements - is there something you would like to share with us today?
15:19:45 <carloss> okay, next topic
15:19:54 <carloss> #topic Review Focus
15:20:37 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-antelope-review-focus
15:21:08 <carloss> from the FFE grants we still have changes open related to:
15:21:18 <carloss> share network subnets metadata (NetApp driver change)
15:21:37 <carloss> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/869708/
15:21:48 <carloss> it's looking ready - I'll circle back and add feedback again
15:22:28 <carloss> gouthamr: could you please take a look at this change?
15:22:54 <carloss> and carthaca++ - thank you for the feedback
15:23:32 <gouthamr> ack
15:24:30 <carloss> and the other FFE grant was:
15:24:32 <carloss> NetApp ONTAP - REST API transition
15:24:33 <gouthamr> the change looks simple enough, felipe_rodrigues have you tested this and can you share any results on the patch?
15:24:33 <felipe_rodrigues> thank you all
15:25:26 <carloss> REST transition client has merged, but there are still some huge changes to go
15:25:59 <carloss> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/871103 (REST transition - DHSS False Basic operations )
15:25:59 <carloss> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/871104 (REST transition - Data motion related functions )
15:25:59 <carloss> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/871105 (REST transition - DHSS True functions)
15:26:14 <carloss> gouthamr++
15:28:02 <carloss> for these, I see upstream CI has voted and thanks nahimsouza[m] for updating the patches
15:28:48 <nahimsouza[m]> thank you all for the reviews :)
15:28:52 <carloss> I have circled back into one of the changes. Looking good, but it would be great to have NetApp CI voting positively at least using ZAPI and also some test runs using REST
15:30:25 <nahimsouza[m]> sure, CI had passed in an old patch set... as soon as it finishes running in the last patch I can share the results with you
15:30:39 <gouthamr> can the Netapp CI run the REST stuff automatically?
15:31:28 <nahimsouza[m]> not yet, gouthamr, we are running manually on the downstream repo
15:32:16 <gouthamr> ack; we see thorough reviews by felipe_rodrigues - thanks for that
15:34:39 <gouthamr> honestly, there may be little _we_ can review here beyond NetApp SMEs.. I’m okay seeing the CI results, pulling the trigger and having you enabling the CI asap
15:35:13 <carloss> gouthamr++
15:37:33 <carloss> okay, so let's follow up on the changes then!
15:37:51 <carloss> thanks for the reviews everyone!
15:38:57 <carloss> on to the next topic:
15:39:01 <carloss> #topic Bug Triage
15:39:17 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug triage etherpad)
15:39:28 <carloss> vhari left us an updated list of bugs :D
15:39:42 <carloss> vhari++
15:40:12 <carloss> first in the list:
15:40:22 <carloss> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2007970 (NetApp volume busy on create from snapshot)
15:40:58 <carloss> thank you for the bug report carthaca
15:41:12 <carloss> any netapper experts willing to take this bug?
15:43:12 <carloss> gah, sorry
15:43:24 <carloss> was looking at the wrong tab when asked the question above
15:43:35 <carloss> there is an ongoing fix
15:43:41 <carloss> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/873868
15:44:10 <carloss> nahimsouza[m] thiagoalvoravel HelenaDantas[m] could you please take a look?
15:45:06 <carloss> for priority I'd say medium and this could be one of the bugs in the list of bugs we want to close in the next bugsquash, so I'd say target to RC1
15:45:07 <nahimsouza[m]> yes, sure
15:45:13 <carloss> does anyone oppose to that plan?
15:46:45 <carloss> :)
15:46:52 <carloss> just did it
15:47:13 <carloss> next in the list:
15:47:28 <carloss> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2007917 ([xena][cephfs] Manilla availability zone allow to use unauthorized share-type)
15:50:16 <carloss> very detailed info in the bug report
15:51:22 <carloss> sounds a bit more urgent as it's allowing shares to be created where they should not
15:51:25 <gouthamr> I disagree; I think the issue is what the share types look like
15:51:43 * gouthamr disagrees on the details provided :)
15:52:02 <carloss> oh :)
15:52:37 <gouthamr> I suspect st1 isn’t selective enough to restrict shares to the first backend per their expectations..
15:53:55 <carloss> yep
15:56:48 <carloss> could you please add your thoughts to the bug report?
15:57:01 <gouthamr> carloss: yes
15:57:07 <carloss> thanks gouthamr
15:57:15 * carloss checks time
15:57:19 <carloss> 3 minutes to go
15:57:31 <carloss> I think we can wrap up here :)
15:57:58 <carloss> thank you all for joining!
15:58:07 <carloss> see you in #openstack-manila
15:58:10 <carloss> #endmeeting