15:01:01 #startmeeting manila 15:01:01 Meeting started Thu Nov 9 15:01:01 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ashrodri. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:01 The meeting name has been set to 'manila' 15:01:03 courtesy ping vkmc dviroel felipe_rodrigues vhari gouthamr carthaca msaravan pulluri 15:01:36 hi 15:01:42 hi 15:01:57 o/ hello everyone 15:02:05 carloss is unavailable this week, I'll be leading todays meeting 15:02:18 today's meeting agenda: 15:02:20 o/ 15:02:23 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings 15:04:25 Hi 15:05:33 okay, let's get started 15:05:38 #topic Announcements 15:05:47 #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html 15:06:11 Next week is actually Caracal milestone-1, so make sure any bugs targeted for that date are added to the review etherpad, or retargeted for m-2. 15:07:41 #topic Caracal PTG Summary 15:07:48 Thanks for a great PTG guys! Carlos has sent a summary of events to the mailing list here: 15:07:56 #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/V753YIV7YUJRYEESFUXTXGDYULDOTMJL/ 15:08:04 and there is a summary etherpad here: 15:08:10 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/caracal-ptg-manila-summary 15:08:20 one of our AIs from PTG is to update this spec on multiple share network subnets: 15:08:26 #link https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/manila-specs/specs/release_independent/share-server-multiple-subnet.html 15:08:38 the implementation concluded a while ago: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/825110 is there anything we think is missing? Is this something we can consider done? 15:09:47 o/ we took this AI because not everyone that uses/is familiar with this feature may have been at the PTG session 15:12:12 i'm looking at the spec's work items: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/manila-specs/specs/release_independent/share-server-multiple-subnet.html#work-items 15:12:33 - Add ability to define multiple subnets in the same share network AZ 15:12:33 - Add ability to “update” subnets in a share network AZ 15:12:43 don't we have both of these at this point? 15:14:28 felipe_rodrigues dviroel: you may have been involved with designing this; do you recall if anything in particular was pending? 15:15:10 I think we deliever those points 15:16:09 i would need to double check all, can't remember 15:16:24 ack ty felipe_rodrigues dviroel; i read through the spec and i don't find anything jumping out at me as missing 15:20:10 * gouthamr got distracted.. 15:20:43 dviroel: sure thing; we can take the conversation to #openstack-manila and decide what we'll do 15:21:17 i wanted to create a new field indicating "completed"/"implemented" multi-release work 15:21:33 where we can tag this one, and the openstackclient one.. 15:24:21 nothing else to add here; we can move on, ashrodri 15:25:15 alright thanks goutham, felipe_rodrigues 15:25:44 We now have a patch up that adds documentation reagrding stable branch maintenance policy here: 15:25:46 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/900490 15:25:58 gouthamr, this is your topic, anything to add? 15:26:20 yep 15:26:57 we discussed this at the PTG too; and noted that we need to have some meta doc explaining stable branch maintenance as we've spoken about it.. so i re-read the docs we have, and added the missing commentary 15:28:17 ill add myself as reviewer 15:28:33 thanks; i'd like us to read through it, and if we need to add any more unspoken things to the doc, i'd be happy to edit.. 15:30:18 oh, currently stable branches badly need some review attention 15:30:32 i'm mulling a review day just to clear the backlog 15:31:01 many of these are clean cherry-picks, with passing CI etc.. 15:31:29 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/2023.2+status:open (stable/2023.2) 15:31:39 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/2023.1+status:open 15:31:51 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/zed+status:open 15:31:57 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/yoga+status:open 15:32:46 does a review day sound feasible? 15:33:42 when? 15:34:24 perhaps next week, starting halfway of this meeting at 1530? 15:35:03 ack .. fine with that. 15:35:53 agreed 15:36:49 ++ thanks; lets do it.. i'll send this out on the ML as well 15:38:01 great! moving on... 15:38:08 #topic Review Focus 15:38:14 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-caracal-review-focus 15:38:19 Only two patches listed in this etherpad so far, please take some time and add any of your patches ready for review. Is there any to call out during this meeting? 15:39:13 yes; can anyone help with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/898992 ? 15:39:49 dviroel? (vkmc and haixin will probably read scrollback) 15:43:05 *crickets* :D 15:43:18 lets take this elsewhere.. 15:44:25 okay, next up... 15:44:36 #topic Bug Triage 15:44:47 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new 15:44:54 vhari the floor is yours.. 15:45:22 vhari had a conflicting meeting 15:45:40 she's added a couple of bugs for us to review 15:45:42 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1915083 15:46:06 this is a doc bug that needs an assignee 15:46:39 i think oslo docs improved from the time we created this bug 15:46:41 #link https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.middleware/latest/reference/healthcheck_plugins.html 15:47:25 anyone interested in attempting a short blurb to our admin doc covering this? 15:50:05 * gouthamr will add some details to the bug 15:50:13 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1660825 15:50:15 any time line for this ? if it's for m2, you can assign 15:50:52 msaravan: no rush; m2 is certainly fine.. thank you! 15:51:12 Sure. 15:51:23 regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1660825 15:51:28 we have an open review 15:51:30 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/840187 15:52:03 i suppose lucas is no longer working on this.. 15:52:24 this was a nice-to-have enhancement; and having this would allow drivers to enhance their code 15:52:49 but, its certainly less useful if we keep punting.. 15:53:53 the fix that lucas and matheus attempted seems correct 15:54:17 but the patch needs a rebase 15:55:04 Anything on Lucas, I'll assign to one of the NetApp engineers. 15:55:24 this one, I have noted it down gouthamr 15:55:49 thanks msaravan 15:56:08 i can unassign lucas so one of you can claim this bug yourself 15:56:22 sure 15:56:48 but, i see some trouble with launchpad -- the "assign me" button doesn't show up.. i haven't been able to figure out why 15:57:28 i _think_ it starts showing up if you rack up some launchpad karma -- our outreachy prospects indicated this 15:57:39 so if you have trouble, please ping me 15:57:46 that's a wrap on the bugs 15:57:59 thanks gouthamr 15:58:04 okay, wrapping up... 15:58:10 #topic Open discussion 15:58:16 Anything more to bring up today? 15:58:17 I just have one point. As you may know, the PTG week was the last week of Caique, Thiago and me here. I didn't have the opportunity to officially announce that, so I just want to thank all of you, specially carlos, douglas and goutham who had helped a lot us. Hope see you again. 15:59:30 thanks for being part of this great community felipe_rodrigues! 15:59:37 felipe_rodrigues! indeed! it was a pleasure; thank you for all the work you've done over the years 15:59:43 felipe_rodrigues: don't be a stranger :) we'd love to have you back someday.. 15:59:47 ++ 16:01:23 Thanks for joining us, have a great rest of your day! 16:01:28 #endmeeting