15:00:33 <carloss> #startmeeting manila
15:00:33 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Feb 15 15:00:33 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carloss. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:33 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:33 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'manila'
15:01:10 <carloss> courtesy ping: dviroel vhari gouthamr carthaca msaravan pulluri
15:01:29 <haixin> o/,  I have two days left for the Spring Festival holiday. :)
15:01:37 <msaravan> Hi
15:01:42 <vhari> hi
15:01:46 <jayaanand> hi
15:02:04 <gireesh> hi
15:02:13 <carloss> haixin: \o/ hope you are having a great time :D
15:02:23 <gouthamr> hello o/
15:02:32 <haixin> thanks o/
15:04:55 <carloss> hello everyone and welcome
15:05:08 <carloss> the agenda for today's meeting is:
15:05:09 <carloss> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_meeting
15:05:24 <carloss> #topic Announcements
15:05:39 <carloss> Schedule and Deadlines:
15:05:45 <carloss> #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html
15:05:56 <carloss> we're ~2 weeks away from feature freeze
15:06:04 <carloss> kinda too close :)
15:07:23 <carloss> and I think at this point we already have all features we are targeting to this release proposed to gerrit
15:08:04 <carloss> we'll get to that in a minute
15:08:20 <msaravan> For NetApp, we saw an issue on share deletion in latest ontap release.. we would like to address it ..hoping to take care of that via bug.
15:08:31 <msaravan> this is affecting Manila CI as well.
15:08:40 <carloss> ah, sure msaravan
15:08:54 <msaravan> will discuss that next week, with you and gouthamr
15:08:57 <msaravan> thank you
15:09:33 <carloss> thank you for mentioning
15:09:38 <carloss> and yes, we can treat it as a bug
15:09:50 <carloss> I'd only recommend you to file a launchpad bug, so we can keep track of the failure
15:09:58 <gouthamr> +1
15:09:59 <carloss> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila
15:11:29 <gouthamr> any collab reviews for us to plan? jayaanand kpdev gireesh and anyone else?
15:12:00 <carloss> msaravan: could you please file the bug in launchpad?
15:12:09 <carloss> gouthamr: good thought
15:12:10 <msaravan> Sure carloss , will do
15:14:31 <carloss> gireesh jayaanand: just in case you're not very familiar with collab reviews, here are some examples:
15:14:32 <carloss> #link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMpq0KlOif4&list=PLnpzT0InFrqCZB_t2B3IHEYH3_gPFEhck
15:14:43 <jayaanand> ok
15:15:02 * carloss not sure if you were around when we had the previous collab reviews
15:15:02 <gireesh> thanks carloss for sharing it
15:15:23 <carloss> but it's a great way to talk through your code, explain what you've done and the key aspects of your implementation
15:15:29 <carloss> and it can help speed up the review process
15:16:13 <gireesh> sure
15:16:15 <msaravan> Yes, its needed for these features definitely.
15:16:44 <gireesh> just wanted to update that I have raise the patch for backup feature for netapp driver
15:17:11 <gireesh> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/909115
15:18:24 <carloss> awesome! thank you
15:18:39 <carloss> I just added it to the review focus etherpad
15:18:58 <gireesh> thanks carloss
15:19:14 <carloss> so would you guys be okay hosting the review collab review session between now and next Tuesday?
15:19:43 <carloss> it should be alright to have a single session and cover both features
15:20:22 <carloss> jayaanand gireesh ^
15:20:39 <jayaanand> tempest changes are pending
15:21:23 <carloss> jayaanand: that should be alright
15:21:53 <carloss> I mean, not a big issue if you don't have the tempest change completed by then
15:21:53 <gireesh> I am fine carloss
15:21:54 <jayaanand> +1
15:22:00 <carloss> awesome, thank you!
15:22:23 <carloss> could you please send an email to the openstack-discuss mailing list scheduling it? we've done this in the past
15:22:31 <carloss> I can link you some examples of the email
15:22:35 <carloss> to announce this kinda thing
15:23:23 <carloss> one last bit of announcement:
15:23:31 <carloss> our py311 job is broken
15:24:10 <carloss> tkajinam saw the failure and started working on a fix... gouthamr and I were trying to triage it yesterday
15:24:43 <carloss> gouthamr opened a launchpad but for the issue... we can do the launchpad triage in the bug triage part of this meeting
15:25:00 <carloss> so please hold your rechecks in case the only job failing for you is py311 until we get this fixed
15:25:40 <carloss> that's all I had for annoncements
15:25:43 <carloss> do you have an announcement to share with us today? :)
15:25:43 <msaravan> @carloss : pls share some sample emails. One of us will send an email to openstack-discuss mailing list. Will plan it for next week.
15:25:52 <carloss> msaravan: sure
15:27:11 <carloss> #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027329.html
15:27:17 <carloss> here's one example
15:27:41 <carloss> please remember to add the details for people to join it as well (i.e. zoom meeting link, gmeet, jitsi...)
15:27:52 <carloss> alright, on to the next topic
15:28:04 <carloss> #topic Review Focus
15:28:18 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-caracal-review-focus
15:28:42 <carloss> we have a couple of features to review in this cycle, and it would be nice if we could get the reviews going
15:30:14 <carloss> we have three main new features
15:30:26 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-caracal-review-focus#L55
15:31:04 <carloss> and they also have client changes
15:31:59 <carloss> all the feature additions to the client must be completed by the feature freeze. If they are not completed by then, it will only be available in the next client release
15:32:14 <carloss> when merged, of course
15:32:51 <carloss> so it would be nice if we could get all of the targeted features and their corresponding OSC/manilaclient changes merged by Feb 29th
15:34:04 <carloss> I think we worked with some review assignments in the previous weekly meeting
15:34:25 <carloss> and we should do some review assignments to the two features proposed this week
15:35:01 <carloss> jayaanand gireesh msaravan: could you review your peer's changes? :)
15:35:23 <msaravan> Sure ..  started !!
15:35:28 <jayaanand> sure
15:35:32 <carloss> awesome, ty
15:35:49 <carloss> I'll also tag carthaca and kpdev in the changes
15:36:08 <carloss> and we'll need some more +2 powers, maybe gouthamr + dviroel in the netapp changes :D
15:36:14 <carloss> and myself
15:36:29 <gireesh> sure @carloss
15:36:34 <carloss> great
15:36:34 <gouthamr> ack
15:36:41 <carloss> ty folks :)
15:37:05 <carloss> that's all I had for review focus. Is there any other change you'd like to highlight during this meeting?
15:38:06 <carloss> taking silence as no...
15:38:11 <carloss> #topic Bug Triage (vhari)
15:38:19 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug Triage etherpad)
15:38:26 <carloss> vhari: floor is yours
15:38:35 <vhari> ty carloss
15:38:45 <vhari> 1st bug to triage
15:38:46 <vhari> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2052785
15:39:11 <vhari> this is a new bug and we are looking for initial triage info
15:40:15 <msaravan> ack. will add to it next week.
15:40:53 <carloss> msaravan: ty :)
15:42:10 <carloss> hmm, I think we did this at the time because there could be limitations in terms of the replicas when doing the migration
15:43:30 <carloss> I think if they're all in the same replication domain (share servers, replicas and shares), it might work
15:44:51 <carloss> well, this sounds more like an RFE
15:45:02 <carloss> so I would say it would have a low priority
15:45:07 <carloss> we could discuss further the use case
15:45:38 <vhari> carloss++ will do
15:46:04 <vhari> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2053100
15:47:04 <carloss> good catch by gouthamr
15:47:24 <gouthamr> this could be a low priority as well; preferred paths not represented accurately is a UX issue… and I’m realizing this happens with any driver…
15:48:28 <gouthamr> for example, netapp sets preferred paths based on the LIF attached to the home node that the aggregate is on, iirc… and if that were to change and the driver was re-exporting the shares, it wouldn’t be able to update the “preferred” path
15:48:49 <vhari> is this a regression resulted from the fix?
15:48:54 <gouthamr> the problem is partially in the sqlalchemy api code
15:48:58 <vhari> https://launchpad.net/bugs/2035137
15:49:48 <gouthamr> not a regression; we didn’t set any “preferred” paths before that bug fix in the CephFS driver… and we don’t yet
15:51:03 <gouthamr> I am working on a two-part fix; so you can assign this one to me… the target can be rc1; although I should have it up soon
15:53:03 <carloss> gouthamr++
15:55:10 <vhari> gouthamr++
15:55:13 <vhari> next up
15:55:14 <vhari> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2053211
15:55:56 <carloss> gouthamr: thanks for the bug report
15:56:00 <vhari> carloss, we could wrap due to time or  finish quick triage
15:56:17 <carloss> finish quick triage sounds good
15:56:21 <vhari> for ^^ bug - this is the last new bug :)
15:56:34 <gouthamr> we’d end on a critical one
15:56:50 <gouthamr> gate’s broken with this
15:59:07 <carloss> this would naturally be m-3 and importance critical at this stage
15:59:27 <carloss> gouthamr: are you willing to take a stab at this?
15:59:47 <gouthamr> +1 I’ll debug this a bit more and we’ll chat on #openstack-manila
16:00:01 <vhari> ty gouthamr
16:00:22 <carloss> awesome... tyvm gouthamr
16:00:27 <vhari> let's wrap bugs
16:00:32 <carloss> great vhari
16:00:41 <vhari> ty all for pitching in
16:00:57 <carloss> vhari: thank you for the work with this bugs :)
16:01:04 <carloss> alright, let's wrap up
16:01:12 <carloss> thank you everyone for the participation
16:01:20 <carloss> see you on #openstack-manila
16:01:23 <carloss> #endmeeting