15:00:16 <carloss> #startmeeting manila
15:00:16 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu May  2 15:00:16 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carloss. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:16 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:16 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'manila'
15:00:31 <carloss> courtesy ping:  dviroel vhari gouthamr carthaca msaravan pulluri
15:00:45 <vhari> hi
15:01:04 <ccokeke[m]> Hello
15:01:05 <gouthamr> o/
15:03:33 <carloss> o/ hello everyone... smaller audience today
15:03:43 <carloss> let's get started :)
15:04:51 <carloss> today's meeting agenda:
15:04:52 <carloss> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_meeting
15:05:15 <carloss> #topic Announcements
15:05:24 <carloss> Schedule and Deadlines
15:05:31 <carloss> #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html
15:05:49 <carloss> we're two weeks away from m-1
15:05:50 <gireesh> hi
15:05:54 <carloss> o/ gireesh
15:06:41 <carloss> and ~two months away from our first manila-specific deadline: the spec freeze
15:07:01 <carloss> is there something you are targeting for m-1 and you would like some attention?
15:08:41 <carloss> another announcement would be: I am willing to extend our group of people maintaining the launchpad bugs for Manila
15:09:07 <carloss> and we'll start that by adding ashrodri to the list of active launchpad bug maintainers :)
15:09:40 <carloss> I think that helps us because it means more people can help when needed in the bug updates
15:10:43 <ashrodri> thank you carloss!
15:10:45 <carloss> I found a doc that might be a bit old, but might still be helpful to understand the bug priorities and some other important things while updating bugs
15:10:48 <carloss> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage
15:11:31 <carloss> ashrodri: thank you for participating
15:11:38 <carloss> and for agreeing
15:11:50 <carloss> if someone else would like to help us with that, please let me know
15:12:48 <carloss> it's great to have more people helping with this
15:13:05 <carloss> and the last announcement I have for today is:
15:13:14 <carloss> I'll be on PTO for the next two weeks
15:14:01 <carloss> I have asked ashrodri to please run the upcoming upstream meetings and she kindly accepted
15:14:21 <carloss> I should be back for the May 23rd weekly meeting
15:14:43 <carloss> ashrodri: thank you for taking over while I am away
15:15:48 <carloss> that's all I had in terms of announcements. Do you have an announcement to share with us?
15:18:00 <carloss> taking silence as no
15:18:09 <carloss> #topic Transitioning stable/zed to unmaintained (gouthamr)
15:18:28 <carloss> gouthamr: floor is yours
15:18:37 <gouthamr> thanks carloss
15:19:50 <gouthamr> the new stable branch maintenance policy we adopted seeks to transition the oldest maintained branch to "unmaintained" (in place of extended-maintenance)
15:20:22 <gouthamr> since we have now shipped the 2024.1/caracal release, the oldest maintained branch was stable/zed
15:21:33 <gouthamr> just wanted to check if anyone here is still relying on us publishing any fixes to stable/zed right now
15:22:21 <gouthamr> #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/WIEIJVVBD36RBHP2MP4BWW4F5SFPK4FA/ ([PTL][release][stable] Transition Zed to Unmaintained)
15:22:55 <gouthamr> we've got one fix that wasn't part of a release yet:
15:23:00 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/908939 (Retry on connection error to neutron)
15:24:59 <gouthamr> and in anticipation of renaming this branch, we've abandoned open changes on gerrit:
15:25:05 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/881323 ([NetApp] Fix non-disruptive migration cifs shares)
15:25:16 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/896746 (NetApp API failed. Reason - 18177:Relationship is in use by SnapMirror in local cluster)
15:25:40 <gouthamr> both of these changes can be cherry-picked into unmaintained/zed if there is any interest once we create that new branch
15:26:46 <gouthamr> if you'd like to know more details of what "unmaintained" means, you'll find that information here:
15:26:56 <gouthamr> #link https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#unmaintained (What's an unmaintained branch)
15:28:03 <carloss> gouthamr: thank you for bringing this up. I think we can tag a release for the retry on connection error to neutron fix
15:28:09 <carloss> just so that we include it in a release
15:29:38 <gouthamr> another thing to note is that stable/zed is the last branch we had before we moved to the SLURP (skip-level-upgrade-release-process) model.. which means, someday, we'll put "antelope" (stable/2023.1) into "unmaintained" state, but we won't do that with Bobcat - i.e., we have a unmaintained/2023.2 branch ever.. that branch will just be EOLed
15:31:57 <carloss> good point
15:33:02 <gouthamr> any questions regarding this process, or what will happen next?
15:33:17 <carloss> not from my side
15:33:37 <gouthamr> carloss: we can request a release; we should do it asap..
15:34:01 <carloss> yep, as we didn't hear about other changes, I can go ahead and request a new zed release, and then we can give green light to the releases team
15:34:06 <carloss> to make the transition to unmaintained
15:35:33 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/916516 ([manila] Transition Zed to Unmaintained)
15:36:12 <gouthamr> that's all for $topic; if you have any follow up questions, please post them on #openstack-manila or on that gerrit review ^
15:36:26 <carloss> gouthamr++ thank you!
15:36:55 <carloss> #topic Review Focus
15:37:03 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-dalmatian-review-focus
15:37:10 <carloss> our review focus etherpad ^
15:37:16 <carloss> gouthamr: thank you for creating it
15:37:25 <carloss> a couple of changes have been added already
15:38:43 <carloss> and most of the changes already had someone looking at them
15:38:46 <kpdev> yeah, i need review share encryption, spec lite of metadata propogration, netapp resume clone split..
15:39:05 <carloss> sure kpdev! thank you for proposing these changes
15:40:03 <kpdev> clone split should be merged as it has +1 from netapp folks
15:40:57 <carloss> ack
15:41:01 <carloss> haixin_1 gouthamr ashrodri gireesh: can I have your eyes on the changes Kiran mentioned?
15:42:23 <carloss> I would like to get our attention to one change specifically as well:
15:42:36 <carloss> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/916013 (Adds usedforsecurity=False to NetApp ONTAP MD5 hashes)
15:42:45 <carloss> gireesh kpdev ^ can I have your eyes here?
15:43:14 <carloss> the NDSU interns that were working with us proposed this change, as part of their effort to fix issues that bandit pointed out in our repositories
15:43:18 <carloss> they already wrote what needed to be
15:43:39 <carloss> but it is important to have someone from netapp looking at the changes
15:46:10 <carloss> that's all I had for #topic
15:46:17 <carloss> do you have something else to bring up?
15:47:15 <gouthamr> yes
15:47:20 <gouthamr> can i have some reviewers assigned to
15:47:27 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/916025 (RBAC: Enable "new" defaults and scope checks)
15:47:59 <carloss> sure, I can take a look...
15:48:08 <carloss> ashrodri haixin_1: could you please take a look at this too?
15:48:09 <gouthamr> its one of a few RBAC things we'd need to do in this cycle; and its good to get some soaktime in the CI
15:48:18 <haixin_1> ok, sure
15:48:29 <gouthamr> thank you carloss haixin_1
15:48:47 <carloss> ty for working on it, gouthamr
15:49:00 <carloss> #topic Bug Triage
15:49:06 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug Triage etherpad)
15:49:11 <carloss> vhari: o/ floor is yourt
15:49:14 <carloss> yours*
15:49:19 <vhari> ty carloss
15:49:27 <vhari> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2064154
15:49:44 <vhari> looking for minor triage atm
15:50:37 <carloss> gouthamr: thanks for filing the bug... and yes, it seems outdates
15:50:45 <carloss> outdated*
15:51:27 <gouthamr> seems like a good low-hanging-fruit bug
15:51:51 <carloss> yep... maybe we can set low prio... I remember ccokeke[m] was working on a feature itself.
15:52:03 <carloss> ccokeke[m]: is that documentation something you would be willing to take a look at?
15:52:26 <carloss> also open to someone else that might be interested on taking a stab a this
15:52:29 <ccokeke[m]> Yes
15:53:07 <vhari> ccokeke[m]++
15:53:08 * carloss can't type properly today
15:53:13 <carloss> ccokeke[m]++ thank you!
15:53:42 <vhari> carloss, seems we are out of time for bugs today
15:53:56 <vhari> floor is yours again :)
15:53:59 <ccokeke[m]> carloss: gouthamr:  Please could you take a look: I am getting difference in the actual and reference output
15:53:59 <ccokeke[m]> https://paste.opendev.org/show/bAkyY7Qx8w5UrDuk8Rn3/
15:54:42 <gouthamr> ccokeke[m]: ack; this fell off the radar. I have draft comments; the test needs some more fixes
15:55:01 <ccokeke[m]> Noted
15:55:01 <carloss> ccokeke[m]: in a first glance, apparently the v2 is missing from the url
15:55:06 <carloss> need to look at the change itself :)
15:55:50 <ccokeke[m]> Ok.I will and revert back.Thanks for the opportunity
15:57:18 <carloss> np :)
15:58:54 <carloss> vhari: thank you for working on the bugs list, I think next week will have more time to go over it
15:59:01 <carloss> let's wrap up this meeting
15:59:07 <carloss> thank you for participating!
15:59:12 <carloss> let's get back to #openstack-manila
15:59:15 <carloss> #endmeeting