===============================
#openstack-meeting-alt: Marconi
===============================


Meeting started by kgriffs1 at 19:05:11 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/marconi/2013/marconi.2013-01-24-19.05.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Review last week's actions  (kgriffs1, 19:05:37)
  * kgriffs to kick the tires on Pecan  (kgriffs1, 19:05:50)
  * LINK: http://github.com/racker/falcon  (kgriffs1, 19:12:50)

* Review the g1 milestone  (kgriffs1, 19:17:18)
  * LINK: https://launchpad.net/marconi/+milestone/grizzly-1  (kgriffs1,
    19:18:08)
  * Set up Marconi wiki, repo, Launchpad, etc.  (kgriffs1, 19:18:35)
  * Define v1.0 functional and non-functional requirements  (kgriffs1,
    19:19:15)
  * LINK: http://wiki.openstack.org/marconi/specs/grizzly  (kgriffs1,
    19:20:09)
  * Define v1.0 API  (kgriffs1, 19:21:47)
  * Create a skeleton implementation and test suite  (kgriffs1,
    19:23:48)
  * ACTION: kgriffs1 to move coding to g2  (kgriffs1, 19:25:47)

* Decide whether to support tags or some other fanout mechanism, or just
  stick with N-queue approach (for v1.0 at least)  (kgriffs1, 19:27:02)
  * AGREED: Have concrete queues  (kgriffs1, 19:30:25)
  * AGREED: No tags or fanout for v1  (kgriffs1, 19:34:50)

* Consider splitting the API into two namespaces, one for work queuing
  and one for eventing  (kgriffs1, 19:36:37)
  * Pro: Allows for different scaling architectures, storage backends,
    etc.  (kgriffs1, 19:37:34)
  * Pro: Simplifies semantics for the two major use cases  (kgriffs1,
    19:37:42)
  * Con: Remove affordances - clients won't be able to mix/match
    semantics (we would be effectively removing features)  (kgriffs1,
    19:38:11)
  * LINK: http://wiki.openstack.org/marconi/specs/api/v1  (kgriffs1,
    19:43:30)
  * LINK: http://wiki.openstack.org/marconi/specs/api/v1  (kgriffs1,
    19:52:40)
  * AGREED: use per-message lock/receipt IDs or just message IDs
    directly  (kgriffs1, 20:16:35)
  * ACTION: kgriffs1 to update API spec to remove tags, add concrete
    queues  (kgriffs1, 20:21:58)
  * AGREED: Start some discussion threads on the mailing list
    (kgriffs1, 20:25:22)
  * ACTION: everyone think about locking semantics  (kgriffs1, 20:26:25)
  * ACTION: everyone think about / discuss  the implications of a
    unified queue type/namespace and come up with a recommendation for
    next mtg.  (kgriffs1, 20:27:00)



Meeting ended at 20:27:32 UTC.



Action items, by person
-----------------------

* kgriffs1
  * kgriffs1 to move coding to g2
  * kgriffs1 to update API spec to remove tags, add concrete queues
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * everyone think about locking semantics
  * everyone think about / discuss  the implications of a unified queue
    type/namespace and come up with a recommendation for next mtg.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* kgriffs1 (118)
* treeder (66)
* openstack (3)
* edsrzf (2)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4