04:01:24 <samP> #startmeeting masakari 04:01:25 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May 16 04:01:24 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is samP. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 04:01:26 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 04:01:28 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'masakari' 04:01:33 <samP> sagara: hi.. 04:01:40 <abhishekk> Hi 04:01:47 <samP> abhishekk: hi 04:02:28 <abhishekk> samP: hi, how are you, how was the journey 04:02:37 <samP> right after the summit, mightn not have updates...anyway..lets start with bugs 04:03:03 <samP> abhishekk: still jetlag... too sleepy in daytime :) 04:03:14 <abhishekk> samP: same here :) 04:04:04 <samP> abhishekk: I hate to travel with time diffs... next time would be better..its AUS 04:04:19 <samP> #topic critical bugs 04:04:41 <abhishekk> samP: yes, but PTG will be in US again 04:04:48 <samP> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/masakari/+bug/1690768 04:04:50 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1690768 in masakari "Notification status will be "error" if recovered instance was "resized"." [High,New] 04:04:57 <samP> abhishekk: Right... 04:05:47 <rkmrHonjo> samP: Can I split the report to two reports? 04:05:51 <samP> abhishekk: Im not gonna attend full PTG...:) 04:06:03 <samP> rkmrHonjo: why? 04:07:02 <samP> rkmrHonjo: why would you think so? I can only see one issue here. 04:07:30 <rkmrHonjo> samP: I wrote two expected behaviour. but , IMO, I think that these are difference problems after that. 04:08:18 <abhishekk> rkmrHonjo: have you checked sheve case with shelved_offload_time -1 i.e. never offload? 04:08:55 <abhishekk> i.e. instance is in shelved state and recovery happens? 04:09:05 <rkmrHonjo> notification status will be going to error, this is severe issue. But, IMO, recovering "stopped->resized" instance as "active" is not severe. 04:09:45 <samP> abhishekk: why would some one do that, shelved with -1? 04:09:45 <rkmrHonjo> abhishekk: shelved_offload? This report tell about resize. Would you like to say that resize auto confirm? 04:10:24 <abhishekk> rkmrHonjo: no this is different, we will test this scenario 04:11:59 <rkmrHonjo> abhishekk: Did you say that you tested recovering "resized" instance? And, notification status was "finished" when you tested? 04:12:00 <samP> shelved with offload_time -1 is diffent scenario but sill could related to same situation, if node goes down. 04:12:32 <abhishekk> samP: right, we will check this scenario 04:12:50 <samP> abhishekk: thanks... let us know the result.. 04:13:04 <abhishekk> samP: sure 04:13:42 <abhishekk> samP: will let you know on irc or will comment on same bug once done 04:13:55 <samP> abhishekk: great.. thanks 04:14:19 <rkmrHonjo> abhishekk: ah, sorry, I misunderstood that you already tested. 04:14:54 <abhishekk> rkmrHonjo: no problem 04:15:30 <samP> rkmrHonjo: you wants to split the report because, 1) Fix the notification status 2)Fix the recovery flow for resized state VMs 04:15:42 <samP> rkmrHonjo: ^^ Am I right? 04:15:51 <rkmrHonjo> samP: yes. 04:16:54 <rkmrHonjo> 1 is issue about notification status. But 2 is issue about instance status. 04:17:32 <samP> rkmrHonjo: correct, but those 2 are still related to same issue, right? 04:18:04 <samP> rkmrHonjo: If you think its better to split this, then please go ahead. 04:18:20 <rkmrHonjo> samP: thanks. I'll split after that. 04:18:31 <samP> rkmrHonjo: sure, thanks. 04:18:55 <samP> OK then, any other bugs..? 04:19:20 <sagara> ok, nothing 04:19:26 <samP> sagara: thanks. 04:19:46 <samP> let's move to discussion 04:19:57 <samP> #topic Discussion points 04:20:41 <samP> #link Recovery method customization https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458023/ 04:22:00 <samP> I think it doses make sense to add Mistral to alternative.. 04:22:19 <samP> abhishekk: what would you think about adam's comment? 04:23:19 <abhishekk> samP: ok, I will discuss with Tushar San and modify the specs 04:23:35 <samP> abhishekk: sure... 04:23:50 <samP> #action samP Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458023/ 04:24:02 <samP> I will review this^^ 04:24:19 <samP> Other Pike work items 04:24:41 <samP> Notifying API progress: BP submitted 04:24:47 <samP> rkmrHonjo: thanks ^^ 04:24:55 <abhishekk> samP: thanks, also review api documentation 04:25:10 <samP> abhishekk: sure... I will do that 04:25:35 <abhishekk> samP: could you please share blueprint link for notifying API? 04:25:47 <samP> #action samP Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459516/ 04:26:05 <rkmrHonjo> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/masakari/+spec/notifications-in-masakari 04:26:08 <abhishekk> samP: thanks 04:26:26 <samP> rkmrHonjo: thanks... 04:26:43 <samP> abhishekk: rkmrHonjo put the link 04:27:01 <abhishekk> rkmrHonjo: thanks :) 04:27:39 <rkmrHonjo> I and Takahara describe specs and implement from now on. 04:27:49 <samP> rkmrHonjo: thank you... 04:28:11 <abhishekk> rkmrHonjo: great 04:28:32 <Dinesh_Bhor> rkmrHonjo: let me know if any help needed 04:28:48 <rkmrHonjo> Dinesh_Bhor: Thanks! 04:29:06 <samP> Force Stonith: had some discussion with Adam about this. 04:29:24 <samP> I will add spec for this one soo. Really sorry for the delay.. 04:29:55 <samP> Improve the masakari-hostmonitor's implementation about detecting split-brain 04:30:17 <rkmrHonjo> samP: Sorry, no update. I'll update next week. 04:30:34 <samP> rkmrHonjo: sure...NP 04:30:57 <samP> Other are Just BPs with no specs. 04:31:10 <samP> (1) Prevent from flapping feature 04:31:31 <samP> (2) Recoverable libvirt events customization 04:31:32 <sagara> I'll add 'Prevent from flapping' BP 04:31:37 <samP> sagara: sure 04:32:14 <samP> sagara: We can discuss how to do this in separate session or IRC 04:32:54 <samP> for (2) Recoverable libvirt events customization, this would be a BP for masakari-monitors. 04:33:23 <samP> Please add them when you have time.. 04:34:15 <sagara> samP: thanks 04:35:00 <samP> Let's move to AOB 04:35:05 <samP> #topic AOB 04:35:26 <samP> About rpm packaging 2/3 done. 1 wating 04:35:57 <samP> Once, it is done, I will fix the tags for all masakari packages. 04:37:41 <samP> Maxwell Li asked about ansible support for Masakari 04:38:10 <samP> #link Request Ansible support for Masakari http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115944.html 04:38:47 <samP> I will discuss with him about how to proceed with this 04:40:34 <rkmrHonjo> samP: By the way, you fixed masakariclient package in pypi. thanks. I'll try to add it to global-requirements. 04:40:38 <abhishekk> samP: ok, we will keep watch on ML 04:41:38 <samP> rkmrHonjo: yes. But I have push 3.0.0 tag and need to add pip packging jobs to gate 04:42:07 <samP> abhishekk: thanks... 04:42:28 <samP> <<Request to all>> 04:42:36 <rkmrHonjo> samP: Ok. Should I add it after you done? 04:42:51 <rkmrHonjo> sorry for interrupting... 04:43:38 <samP> Sice we have done presentaions, HA session, in summit, now pepole may ask question about masakari in ML or IRC 04:44:05 <samP> Please answer them if you can... or let me know if Im not there.. 04:44:13 <abhishekk> samP: sure 04:44:20 <sagara> OK, Sure 04:44:46 <rkmrHonjo> samP: Sure. 04:46:36 <samP> I will also work with openstack HA community for add resorce-agents, and you all are welcome to openstack HA meetings 04:46:53 <samP> #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#High_Availability_Meeting 04:47:08 <samP> Any other topics to discuss? 04:48:12 <abhishekk> samP: nothing from our side 04:48:21 <Dinesh_Bhor> nothing 04:48:23 <rkmrHonjo> nothing 04:48:25 <sagara> nothing 04:48:50 <samP> OK then, lets finish bit early... 04:49:02 <abhishekk> Thank you all 04:49:09 <Dinesh_Bhor> thanks to all 04:49:23 <samP> OH. Dinesh_Bhor, I will replay to your mail about pacemaker 04:49:31 <samP> thank you all... 04:49:34 <rkmrHonjo> bye 04:49:35 <samP> #endmeeting