04:00:16 #startmeeting masakari 04:00:16 Meeting started Tue Apr 24 04:00:16 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is samP. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 04:00:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 04:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'masakari' 04:00:28 Hi all for masakari 04:00:33 hi 04:00:34 Hi all 04:01:12 Dinesh_Bhor: Thanks for info about release. I will push required patches right after this meeting 04:01:25 samP: Okay 04:01:28 Thank you 04:01:44 lkwan_: hi 04:01:51 Let's start the meeting. 04:02:07 #topic High priority items 04:02:20 (1) Introspective Instance Monitoring 04:02:36 I would like to follow up with the review 04:03:08 e.g. who could be in the review list or how to make it forward. 04:03:15 lkwan_: From my side I need some more time to try out the patches 04:03:37 lkwan_: current status, 04:03:58 I tried out and it should be fine 04:04:07 lkwan_: I would appreciate if you address the review comments given on the specs till then. 04:04:19 for spec, information in the spec it LGTM. we need to change the directory for rocky 04:04:37 what review comments? 04:05:00 We addressed all. 04:05:38 lkwan_: FYI I already have Rocky patch up for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560237/ . I have given comments on this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469070/ 04:06:00 I see 04:06:06 lkwan_: comments are not for the patch, but for the spec 04:06:39 lkwan_: Those are trivial I would say. Will not take much time 04:07:37 for the patches, me, Tushar and Dinesh are reviewing the patch. 04:07:53 thanks. 04:08:00 how about the https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-masakariclient/+bug/1756047 04:08:01 Launchpad bug 1756047 in python-masakariclient "masakari command failed due to os-service-type1.2.0" [Critical,Confirmed] 04:08:01 sorry for the delay. Do you have any specific dead line for this? 04:08:13 well. 04:08:50 Sooner is better as we would like to move on, Greg may want to think about a new set of blueprint 04:09:02 lkwan_, samP: There is no reply on this thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-April/129578.html 04:09:14 lkwan_: we asking for new sdk version before we merge those patches to fix this. 04:09:35 Need to contact Monty. 04:09:37 Dinesh_Bhor: I will ask again 04:09:49 samP: Thank you 04:09:53 I aware of the dependenies 04:10:56 I will try to get new sdk version asap. Then we can move on with this. 04:11:11 that will be great. Thanks. 04:11:54 lkwan_: np 04:12:10 I will take a look on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560237/ and it seems ok 04:13:24 lkwan_: thanks. once we merge ^^, please resubmit the sepc with Rocky target 04:13:41 lkwan_: Thanks 04:13:44 sure. 04:14:17 lkwan_: I will proceed reviewing the patches for masakari-monitors and masakari 04:15:25 I would like to get them merge before mid May... 04:16:04 samP: noted 04:16:04 lkwan_: Any other questions or comments from your side? 04:16:36 sounds good and before the coming openstack summit will work. 04:16:52 thanks again. 04:17:27 lkwan_: Definitely before the summit.. 04:17:32 I heard from Greg that you have a talk based on this in coming summit. 04:17:53 Greg will do it. 04:18:23 lkwan_: Okay, 04:18:53 #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule/events/21365/deep-insights-high-availability-vms-with-a-simple-reliable-host-to-guest-interface 04:19:07 ^^ here is the link. 04:19:38 Great!!! 04:19:42 Thanks for the link 04:19:53 lkwan_: please let us know if you need any help on this. 04:20:01 Let's move to next item. 04:20:08 #topic Critical Bugs 04:20:36 Any bugs or patches need to discuss? 04:20:49 except discussed above 04:21:25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-masakariclient/+bug/1756047 has discussed 04:21:26 Launchpad bug 1756047 in python-masakariclient "masakari command failed due to os-service-type1.2.0" [Critical,Confirmed] 04:21:46 lkwan_: thanks 04:23:17 I think it has merged? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555710 04:23:52 I will try to review pending patches and merge them 04:24:08 lkwan_: seems merged to me 04:24:42 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/546492, is still outstanding. 04:28:08 lkwan_: sdk patch was merged but not released yet. That it the reason why we holding this patch 04:28:44 once we got a new sdk version we are good to go with this. 04:29:53 if any patches or bug need to discuss, please bring them up at end of the meeting. 04:30:04 #topic Discussion Point 04:30:16 (1) Horizon Plugin 04:30:50 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/masakari-dashboard 04:31:36 seems like need to fix the UTs. 04:31:45 good progress. 04:32:10 (3) recovery method customization 04:32:27 These patches are also dependent on sdk newer version. 04:32:52 Dinesh_Bhor: got it. thanks 04:33:23 Any update on recovery method customization? 04:33:53 Not so much. 04:33:53 or we can get update on next week 04:33:58 Dinesh_Bhor: thanks. 04:34:16 (3) Ansible support for Masakari 04:34:40 OSA spec merged. Is repo created yet? 04:35:19 Are we considering to have ansible support? 04:35:28 lkwan_: yes 04:35:40 Not yet. I guess. Niraj is working on masakari-monitors ansible support 04:35:56 Also will we consider HELM based support as well ? 04:35:56 some of the codes are here, #link https://github.com/NirajSingh90/openstack-ansible-os_masakari 04:36:18 nice 04:37:36 HELM is not in the scope. 04:37:53 However, I would like to discuss about HELM 04:38:13 it is becoming more relevant 04:38:35 Niraj is exploring containers configuration for masakari, That will help if we decide to include HELM 04:38:49 since I do not have much knowledge about HELM, not sure how to proceed with this. 04:39:17 Dinesh_Bhor: Good Idea, Thanks. 04:39:23 keep us in the loop and it is more like a language for packaging 04:40:29 lkwan_: great.. I will talk to Niraj about this.. 04:40:56 that will be good and I can help out as well in this area. 04:41:11 I did 2 years of work with docker containers 04:41:31 lkwan_: Cool 04:41:35 lkwan_: thanks..really appreciate it. 04:41:39 and HELM seems a logical stop forward for packaging 04:41:50 logical step foward 04:42:20 BTW, I am working on RPM and DEB packaging now. 04:43:09 Will share with you once produce something useful..:) 04:43:20 nice 04:44:13 #topic AOB 04:44:58 Need to consider migrate from LP to Storyboard.. may be after Rocky or end of the Rocky. 04:45:32 Any other items to discuss? 04:45:55 If not we could finish this meeting bit early.. 04:46:32 Yes, I was about to discuss this topic in last meeting. The spec is not merged yet. It is postponed to S release: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513875/ 04:46:53 This is about LP to Storyboard migration 04:47:08 Nothing else from my side. 04:48:14 Dinesh_Bhor: thanks, true, this patch was not merged and migrating to storyboard is not a release goal. 04:48:29 yes 04:48:38 However, most of the projects are already in storyboard or start to moving into it. 04:48:57 yes 04:49:03 So, we should consider it too. no hard deadlines. 04:49:18 Yes, sure. 04:49:35 Dinesh_Bhor: Thanks for bringing this up 04:49:50 The first step in migrating is to resolve all the open launchpad bugs. 04:50:01 ]if no other items, lets finish today's meeting 04:50:03 So we have concentrate on that first. 04:50:34 Dinesh_Bhor: Agree 04:50:52 Thats it from my side. thanks 04:51:27 Dinesh_Bhor: Thanks 04:52:05 Please use IRC channel #openstack-masakari on Freenode or openstack-dev ML with [masakari] for further discussion. 04:52:18 Thank you for attending masakari meeting 04:52:24 #endmeeting