03:01:42 <tpatil> #startmeeting Masakari
03:01:43 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Aug  7 03:01:42 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tpatil. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
03:01:44 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
03:01:46 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'masakari'
03:01:50 <tpatil> Hi All
03:05:41 <tpatil> Will wait for 10 mins as some of them must be facing registration issue. If no one joins during this time, I will end this meeting.
03:12:48 <tpatil> Hi samP
03:12:56 <tpatil> I have started the meeting
03:13:01 <samP> tpatil: sorry Im late
03:13:12 <tpatil> NP
03:13:18 <tpatil> Please take the pilot seat
03:13:24 <samP> tpatil: thanks,
03:13:46 <samP> #topic Any critical bugs/patches
03:14:09 <samP> I guess commands are not working for me :)
03:14:29 <samP> Anyway, is there any patches or bugs need to discuss?
03:14:37 <tpatil> #topic Any critical bugs/patches
03:14:59 <samP> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/588157/
03:15:11 <tpatil> https://bugs.launchpad.net/masakari/+bug/1779752
03:15:11 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1779752 in masakari "masakari segment-list returns error (openstack queens)" [Critical,Confirmed] - Assigned to SamP (sampath-priyankara)
03:15:28 <tpatil> Shilpa has proposed a patch to fix about issue in stable/queens
03:15:39 <tpatil> s/about/above
03:16:01 <samP> I tested this patch. LGTM
03:16:12 <tpatil> it will work with openstacksdk >=0.11.0
03:16:27 <tpatil> but stable/queens also supports 0.9.19 and 0.10.0
03:17:08 <tpatil> so I have requested Shilpa to add a user friendly message if sdk version is above two and call sys.exit
03:17:10 <samP> yep, that is the problem
03:17:39 <tpatil> so users will be aware to use sdk >0.11.0
03:17:58 <tpatil> What is your opinion?
03:18:07 <samP> tpatil: That means, users are force to use >0.11.0
03:18:14 <tpatil> yes
03:18:40 <tpatil> or we can update requirements lower constraints to 0.11.0
03:19:00 <tpatil> in requirements project for stable/queens branch
03:19:39 <samP> tpatil: updating the lower constraints to 0.11.0 seems a good idea.
03:19:53 <tpatil> mee too
03:19:57 <samP> In that case, we dont need to worry about lower versions.
03:20:07 <tpatil> correct
03:20:32 <samP> OK then, Let's give it a try with Shilpa's current patch.
03:21:13 <samP> There is a very less chance that someone use python-masakariclient with sdk > 0.11.0.
03:21:57 <samP> However, as OpenStack we must support all the versions as it is in requirement.
03:22:10 <tpatil> I will request Shilpa to upload a patch to change the lower constraints in requirements project from 0.9.19 to 0.11.0
03:22:11 <tpatil> is it ok?
03:22:54 <samP> tpatil: sure, thanks. Let's submit the patch to raise the lower constraints to 0.11.0
03:23:21 <tpatil> ok, will do
03:23:29 <samP> Thanks
03:24:31 <tpatil> same issue is also there in masakari-monitors
03:25:03 <tpatil> Shilpa will upload a patch soon to fix this issue in masakari-monitors
03:25:35 <samP> tpatil: thanks. not the master but the stable/queens right/
03:25:51 <tpatil> yes
03:25:57 <tpatil> one observation, masakari-monitors is not using openstackclient but it's still present in requirements.txt
03:27:50 <tpatil> we will fix this issue in master branch. Do you think it should be back ported to stable/queens branch as well?
03:29:14 <samP> tpatil: seems like it. sure, we can backport this
03:29:30 <tpatil> ok, will upload patches soon to fix this issue as well
03:29:47 <tpatil> I will report a LP bug for this
03:30:09 <samP> we have to release new version for stable/queens anyway. let's include this too
03:30:13 <tpatil> it's trivial fix
03:30:17 <samP> tpatil: thanks
03:30:30 <tpatil> samP: Sure
03:31:43 <samP> End of this week is the deadline for the RC1 tag and cut off the stable/rocky
03:32:46 <tpatil> Recovery customization patch is up for review
03:33:48 <samP> tpatil: ah..yes.
03:33:49 <tpatil> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583127/
03:34:04 <tpatil> Pooja has fixed the unit tests issue and uploaded a new PS
03:34:29 <samP> I will take a look again.
03:34:54 <samP> Last time I look it was OK. wont take much time.
03:35:05 <samP> Thanks for the reminder
03:36:26 <samP> I will try to merge this before rc1.
03:36:37 <tpatil> Yes, please
03:37:28 <samP> End of this week, I will propose patches to release rc1 for masakari, masakari-monitors
03:37:47 <samP> stable/rocky for masakari, masakari-monitors, masakari-dashboard
03:38:03 <samP> And will release new version for masakari-dashboard
03:39:01 <tpatil> Ok, Great
03:39:15 <samP> And from next week, we will be able to work on master for Stein
03:40:01 <samP> Any other issues to discuss?
03:40:50 <tpatil> Any deadline to fix masakariclient and masakari-monitors issue in stable/queens?
03:42:06 <samP> No deadline, but sooner the better
03:43:02 <tpatil> yes, masakari-monitor and requirement patches will be uploaded soon, maybe by tomorrow
03:43:34 <samP> And I have to announce the deprecation of python-masakariclient in Stein
03:43:53 <samP> tpatil: sure, thanks.
03:45:12 <tpatil> Is it possible to change IRC meeting time to it's original one?
03:46:27 <tpatil> i.e. 1:00 JST -> 4:00 UTC
03:47:03 <samP> tpatil: sure. I think we can change it back. or bring it 1h early, from 11:00-12:00?
03:47:17 <tpatil> Initially we had change IRC meeting timing in the hope that more people can join meeting. But I could see anyone join this meeting for last 1-2 months.
03:48:09 <samP> tpatil: unfortunately, agree ;)
03:48:10 <tpatil> It's better 1:00 - 2:00 P.M becoz India people can join during this time
03:48:35 <samP> tpatil: great, then let's change it back
03:49:07 <tpatil> Thank you
03:49:38 <tpatil> Are you going to propose a patch to change meeting time?
03:49:50 <samP> tpatil: sure I will
03:50:05 <tpatil> Thanks
03:50:09 <tpatil> Will this change be effective from next meeting?
03:50:47 <tpatil> I guess after your patch is approved, it will be effective
03:51:15 <samP> tpatil: Let's do it form next week meeting. If some one need to change it, let's consider it then
03:51:35 <tpatil> samP: Sure
03:51:38 <samP> tpatil: yes, I can ask them to approve it asap
03:52:24 <tpatil> Great!!!
03:53:02 <samP> I think we can conduct this meeting in #openstack-masakari
03:53:23 <tpatil> you mean weekly IRC meeting?
03:53:32 <samP> tpatil: yes.
03:54:19 <tpatil> That's great then, it won't conflict with other team meetings at all.
03:54:26 <samP> bots are there. I need to try it.
03:54:48 <samP> let me try it, and if it work I will propose to change the channel also.
03:55:02 <tpatil> Sounds good
03:55:21 <samP> #openstack-masakari channel is currently been logged,
03:55:36 <tpatil> yes
03:55:54 <samP> OK then, I will propose those changes
03:56:13 <samP> Any other items to discuss, we have 5 mins left
03:56:18 <tpatil> No
03:56:25 <samP> tpatil: thanks
03:56:35 <samP> Let's finish today's meeting then
03:56:42 <samP> Thank you for your time
03:56:44 <tpatil> Ok, I will end this meeting
03:56:47 <tpatil> Thank you
03:56:51 <tpatil> #endmeeting