07:01:01 <yoctozepto> #startmeeting masakari
07:01:02 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep  1 07:01:01 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yoctozepto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
07:01:03 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
07:01:05 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'masakari'
07:01:09 <yoctozepto> #chair samP
07:01:10 <openstack> Current chairs: samP yoctozepto
07:01:20 <yoctozepto> #topic roll-call
07:01:25 <yoctozepto> \o\
07:01:57 <noonedeadpunk> \o/
07:02:15 <yoctozepto> morning devfaz, please put your hands up in the air like you *do* care :D
07:02:32 <devfaz> \o/ :)
07:02:38 <yoctozepto> that's the spirit
07:02:39 <yoctozepto> :D
07:03:07 <yoctozepto> LuisRmz, jopdorp: meeting time :-)
07:03:52 <osmanlicilegi> o/
07:05:29 <yoctozepto> reusing Tushar's template the next topic is
07:05:34 <yoctozepto> #topic Critical Bugs and Patches
07:05:55 <yoctozepto> And there are none but there has not been much triage in the recent time.
07:06:07 <yoctozepto> If you know about a critical bug, please speak up.
07:08:19 <yoctozepto> #topic CI health
07:08:47 <yoctozepto> so the masakari CI is rather healthy; we've been hit by yesterday's setuptools issue that affected all project testing with devstack
07:09:08 <yoctozepto> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016905.html
07:10:18 <yoctozepto> otoh, I discovered py38 and lower-constraints jobs were noop except for package installation so I proposed a bunch of fix so please take time to review them:
07:10:20 <yoctozepto> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:radoslaw.piliszek%2540gmail.com+status:open+topic:fix-tox
07:11:39 <yoctozepto> with gmann we are working on making sure the move to focal is smooth:
07:11:42 <yoctozepto> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/(project:openstack/masakari+OR+project:openstack/masakari-monitors+OR+project:openstack/python-masakariclient+OR+project:openstack/masakari-dashboard)+topic:migrate-to-focal+status:open
07:12:01 <yoctozepto> there are some issues to be discussed with that still so please do not approve too soon :-)
07:12:26 <yoctozepto> this one is gtg though:
07:12:28 <yoctozepto> #link https://review.opendev.org/744343
07:13:21 <yoctozepto> and there are lots of other smaller fixes that have been proposed, I've approved some trivial ones that I have not authored
07:13:25 <yoctozepto> others waiting for you
07:13:56 <yoctozepto> to track everything open against all masakari repos please use:
07:13:58 <yoctozepto> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/(project:openstack/masakari+OR+project:openstack/masakari-monitors+OR+project:openstack/python-masakariclient+OR+project:openstack/masakari-dashboard)+status:open
07:14:26 <yoctozepto> there is one particular change worth discussing/reviewing and that is by noonedeadpunk:
07:14:34 <yoctozepto> #link https://review.opendev.org/728629
07:14:48 <yoctozepto> you can likely ping noonedeadpunk and/or me to discuss it asynchronously
07:15:13 <devfaz> ok
07:15:55 <yoctozepto> #topic Victoria release planning
07:16:22 <yoctozepto> it's R-6 for Victoria already:
07:16:24 <yoctozepto> #link https://releases.openstack.org/victoria/schedule.html
07:16:56 <yoctozepto> so it's very likely we won't be getting many major features this cycle ;-)
07:17:04 <yoctozepto> as the feature freeze is next week
07:17:36 <yoctozepto> the client lib has to be released that week
07:18:26 <yoctozepto> workitems masakari had for Victoria:
07:18:30 <yoctozepto> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/masakari-victoria-workitems
07:19:26 <yoctozepto> it's very unfortunate Sue (suzhengwei) is not here with us because they are the main driver of current changes
07:20:30 <yoctozepto> there seems to be one goal that looks pretty ready for reviews and should not be overwhelming:
07:20:33 <yoctozepto> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/enable-to-segment+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
07:20:50 <yoctozepto> please read the blueprint and spec before reviewing so that it's easier to understand
07:23:02 <yoctozepto> #topic Open discussion
07:23:15 <yoctozepto> please speak up about anything
07:23:51 <yoctozepto> I'd like to ask samP to add me and other new cores to https://launchpad.net/~masakari-drivers to be able to coordinate masakari bugs
07:24:47 <yoctozepto> my other question to samP is: what does the external (NTT) CI tests against masakari?
07:25:03 <noonedeadpunk> tbh for the features would be great to have one day protection form split brain...
07:26:07 <yoctozepto> noonedeadpunk: please expand your thought - masakari depends on corosync so it should protect you from split brain with standard 3-head clusters
07:27:37 <noonedeadpunk> So, I wasn't using pacemaker-remote at the first place:)
07:28:05 <yoctozepto> noonedeadpunk: :-)
07:28:06 <noonedeadpunk> So I was deploying pacemaker+corosync on all computes
07:28:18 <yoctozepto> ah, that could be painful indeed
07:28:19 <devfaz> ah ok, so maybe we should improve the docs ;)
07:28:29 <yoctozepto> devfaz: ++, my thoughts exactly
07:28:36 <yoctozepto> they are probably lacking in some places
07:28:47 <yoctozepto> we are attacking similar problems with kolla
07:28:55 <noonedeadpunk> but, when I had connectivity issues (ie one node didn't see all others but all of them see masakari-api), just all nodes were marked in maintenance
07:28:56 <yoctozepto> telling ppl "how to think about it"
07:29:44 <yoctozepto> noonedeadpunk: hmm, that's worrying; I think I saw a bug being fixed that might be affecting you
07:29:50 <yoctozepto> lemme dive in gerrit
07:30:41 <yoctozepto> noonedeadpunk: https://review.opendev.org/729206
07:30:44 <noonedeadpunk> but yeah. for sure I need to look into reconfiguring pacemaker+corosync
07:30:52 <yoctozepto> #link https://review.opendev.org/729206
07:31:23 <yoctozepto> noonedeadpunk: true that as well, I've linked you to kolla efforts already but will relink for posterity (and others interested):
07:31:33 <noonedeadpunk> oh, it's pretty recent and looks exactly as my cvase I think
07:31:41 <yoctozepto> #link https://review.opendev.org/670104
07:32:28 <yoctozepto> noonedeadpunk: it talks about remotes so I'm not 100% sure but otherwise sounds similar to the issue you are describing
07:32:53 <yoctozepto> noonedeadpunk: please review anyhow; any and all comments help
07:33:20 <noonedeadpunk> I will try to implement such deployment for OSA I think
07:33:33 <noonedeadpunk> hopefully during this cycle, but no promises)
07:34:19 <yoctozepto> noonedeadpunk: ++, I like to see openstack deployment projects get better even if I work on the competing ones ;p
07:34:45 <yoctozepto> (btw, migrate to kolla; let us harvest your soul :-) )
07:34:56 <noonedeadpunk> no, thanks, docker, uh
07:35:00 <noonedeadpunk> :p
07:35:09 <yoctozepto> haha, it works better than you think
07:35:18 <yoctozepto> I was afraid only at first
07:35:33 <yoctozepto> turned out to be smoother this way, but it's not the meeting for that discussion :D
07:35:50 <noonedeadpunk> we use lxc for that :p
07:35:50 <yoctozepto> anything else? anyone?
07:39:24 <yoctozepto> guess not
07:39:29 <yoctozepto> thank you for today
07:39:35 <yoctozepto> #endmeeting