15:59:43 <rakhmerov> #startmeeting Mistral
15:59:44 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Apr 14 15:59:43 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rakhmerov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:59:45 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:59:47 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'mistral'
16:00:04 <enykeev> hey!
16:00:13 <NikolayM> hi!
16:00:17 <rakhmerov> hi guys
16:00:31 <rakhmerov> let's wait for a couple of mins and start
16:00:50 <rakhmerov> in the meantime I'll type in all the standard stuff
16:01:14 <rakhmerov> agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MistralAgenda
16:01:33 <rakhmerov> let's quickly review AIs
16:01:55 <rakhmerov> #topic Review Action Items
16:02:20 <rakhmerov> 1. (tnurlygayanov) plan to write new tempest tests with execution of the real workflows
16:03:08 <rakhmerov> afaik, timur is still involved into other projects
16:03:33 <rakhmerov> #action (tnurlygayanov) plan to write new tempest tests with execution of the real workflows
16:03:47 <rakhmerov> 2. Timur, make sure to look at running Mistral tests in devstack gate
16:04:04 <dzimine> hi guys, sorry my inet is up and down...
16:04:16 <rakhmerov> hi Dmitri, ok, no problem
16:04:47 <rakhmerov> regarding this action item, we found other resources in Mirantis to set up devstack gate job
16:05:13 <rakhmerov> he's supposed to start working on it this week or on the next one
16:05:40 <rakhmerov> #action (rakhmerov) Check the status of devstack gate job
16:05:57 <rakhmerov> 3. (nmakhotkin) take a look at dzimine's and m4dcoder's workflows
16:06:35 <rakhmerov> nmakhotkin, I know you were busy with a different work but did you have a chance to look at it?
16:06:59 <rakhmerov> I didn't :) I'll definitely start doing it tomorrow since I finished my current work
16:07:50 <NikolayM> I'll look at it asap, tomorrow, I think
16:08:00 <rakhmerov> ok
16:08:18 <rakhmerov> 4. Finish current Demo scenario (make it work) and evaluate workflow examples from Winson's team to find better ideas for Demo
16:08:47 <rakhmerov> regarding this one, the first part is done (we'll talk about it later), nmakhotking made our Demo scenario work
16:09:27 <rakhmerov> once my 10 commits get merged we'll fix all the samples in mistral-extra to make DSL more consistent but basically it works
16:10:18 <rakhmerov> any questions on Action Items?
16:10:28 <rakhmerov> if no, we'll move forward to the current status
16:10:49 <dzimine> just to clarify:
16:11:15 <rakhmerov> ok
16:11:17 <dzimine> do you want to prep demo scenario changes based on Action commits?
16:11:29 <dzimine> This can be started now, right?
16:11:52 <rakhmerov> yes, I would love to have these change in
16:12:18 <dzimine> who is doing demo scenarios adjustments to Action changes?
16:12:21 <rakhmerov> what do mean by "started now"?
16:12:43 <rakhmerov> I am going to do it myself tomorrow, it'll take 30 mins
16:12:53 <rakhmerov> Nikolay doesn't work on Tuesdays
16:13:43 <rakhmerov> can we move forward?
16:14:00 <rakhmerov> ok
16:14:06 <rakhmerov> #topic Current Status
16:14:24 <rakhmerov> I basically finished BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-actions-design except plugin architecture
16:14:49 <rakhmerov> and I have a couple of cosmetic changes to make tomorrow
16:15:27 <rakhmerov> so my plan is to make adjustements in Demo Scenario (Nikolay, make sure to share it today)
16:15:57 <rakhmerov> so please report your status quickly
16:16:03 <rakhmerov> Nikolay?
16:16:05 <enykeev> I've spent most of the week preparing test suite for Lazy Engine. Also published a summary on integration.
16:16:22 <rakhmerov> enykeev, ok, great work
16:16:58 <m4dcoder> i'm still working on the engine standalone process.
16:17:21 <rakhmerov> m4dcoder, do you have any roadblocks? Need help?
16:17:48 <NikolayM> I've already sent the commit on review with demo related changes
16:17:51 <m4dcoder> no tough roadblocks just some design choices.  i'll send out a WIP for review soon.
16:18:21 <rakhmerov> nmakhotkin, ok
16:19:09 <dzimine> m4dcoder: may be bring up the design choices to discuss prior to reveiw, if you need any input (or reduce argument over code already written :) )
16:19:11 <rakhmerov> m4dcoder, ok, please feel free to ask any questions and/or setup dedicated meetings if you think it would be helpful for you
16:19:25 <m4dcoder> will do
16:20:21 <rakhmerov> basically, IMO there's no rush with this task, we can discuss it in a comfortable mode
16:20:45 <rakhmerov> if you'd like we can do it now or take it offline, whatever you prefer
16:21:57 <rakhmerov> dzimine, as far as Manas, we saw his commit. It's fine but we just had one small remark
16:22:06 <rakhmerov> perfectly easy to fix
16:22:28 <rakhmerov> would appreciate if he could fix it today/tomorrow
16:22:32 <dzimine> ok, hope he'll be done with this today
16:22:40 <rakhmerov> ok, perfect
16:23:11 <rakhmerov> #topic POC Demo Scenario readiness
16:23:24 <rakhmerov> we already touched it a little bit
16:24:04 <rakhmerov> we planned to look at workflow scenarios provided by Dmitri but honestly I was unable to do it deeply by now
16:24:39 <rakhmerov> since I finished my current work I can do it tomorrow, nothing should prevent me from doing it
16:25:23 <rakhmerov> so the current scenario works, I just want to make sure to look at other options and see if we can come up with something better
16:26:03 <rakhmerov> on Thursday we are going to have an internal demo in Mirantis so we'll get a feedback from Mirantis management
16:26:23 <rakhmerov> do you guys see what else we could discuss on that?
16:26:30 <rakhmerov> any concerns, questions?
16:26:42 <igormarnat_> I have a suggestion
16:26:52 <rakhmerov> the scenario itself is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86597/
16:26:58 <rakhmerov> yes, Igor
16:27:10 <igormarnat_> I'd like to have a list of things which we need to have in order to think we are ready with POC
16:27:20 <igormarnat_> I mean, list of documents, examples, Bps, ... with links
16:27:25 <igormarnat_> Do we have any?
16:27:50 <rakhmerov> it's mostly in our heads unfortunately
16:27:58 <igormarnat_> It's fine
16:28:10 <rakhmerov> I can do formalize it
16:28:13 <igormarnat_> It's easy to type it in then, isn't it? :)
16:28:22 <rakhmerov> yes
16:28:49 <igormarnat_> Having such a list would make it easy to present the results, say, to Heat team, or Fuel team, or any other team
16:29:06 <rakhmerov> how about preparing this list offline (just to save time now) and sending it out in ML?
16:29:08 <rakhmerov> sure
16:29:10 <rakhmerov> I agree
16:29:44 <igormarnat_> +1 for offline preparation and ML
16:30:20 <gokrokve> Hi. By the way I submitted a proposal for Atlanta summit session slot.  http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/124
16:30:21 <rakhmerov> #action (rakhmerov) Prepare a list of formal criterias of POC readiness (list of documents, examples, Bps, ... with links)
16:30:28 <gokrokve> It is for Mistral POC.
16:30:43 <gokrokve> It is in the prapproved state.
16:30:52 <rakhmerov> hi gogrokve
16:30:57 <rakhmerov> ok, cool
16:31:08 <gokrokve> So you will have a time slot on the summit to present Mistral and show a emo
16:31:14 <gokrokve> demo
16:31:21 <rakhmerov> yes, very good
16:31:32 <dzimine> fantastic, thanks gokrokv
16:31:41 <rakhmerov> how much time will we have for the presentation?
16:31:47 <rakhmerov> 40 mins like unconference track?
16:32:02 <gokrokve> I don't know yet. Somethin from 15 to 40 minutes I think.
16:32:30 <rakhmerov> we discussed it with Dmitri already and it would be cool to know. Depending on that we should have a different presentation plan IMO
16:32:43 <gokrokve> Renat, you can actually add commet to this proposed session.
16:32:45 <rakhmerov> but ok, we'll figure it out
16:33:00 <gokrokve> Renat, you can actually add a comment to this proposed session.
16:33:09 <gokrokve> or you can ask Thierry
16:33:15 <rakhmerov> sure
16:33:19 <rakhmerov> ok
16:34:18 <rakhmerov> the last specific topic we hae is TaskFlow integration status
16:34:25 <rakhmerov> #topic TaskFlow integration status
16:34:44 <rakhmerov> Kirill, could you please provide an update on that?
16:35:01 <rakhmerov> I assume there's almost nothing new but anyway..
16:35:31 <enykeev> Nothing actually changed since the last week. We still waiting for TaskFlow team to prepare their proposition.
16:36:13 <rakhmerov> yeah, I guess the only thing we got from them is an email where Joshua said "Ivan is still working on it.."
16:36:16 <rakhmerov> something like that
16:36:16 <dzimine> The ball is on TaskFlow team side,
16:36:23 <rakhmerov> yep :)
16:36:29 <rakhmerov> their move now
16:36:30 <dzimine> we should ask them 'when'
16:36:45 <rakhmerov> it was supposed to be done last Thursday
16:37:25 <rakhmerov> but agree that we should keep tracking it
16:37:37 <rakhmerov> I'll be pinging them every couple of days
16:37:50 <rakhmerov> any question on this part?
16:38:01 <rakhmerov> if no we can move to an open discussion
16:39:11 <rakhmerov> #action (rakhmerov) Keep pinging TaskFlow team regarding Ivan's ideas
16:39:14 <rakhmerov> #topic Open Discussion
16:40:07 <rakhmerov> just want to bug you again, guys. Sorry if it's a little bit annoying
16:40:37 <rakhmerov> I encourage you to review the commits for BP mistral-actions-design
16:40:49 <rakhmerov> since we really need them asap
16:42:10 <rakhmerov> dzimine, I would even ask Manas to make his commit dependent on the last commit for this BP to make things simpler when we merge all these things
16:42:21 <rakhmerov> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87231/
16:42:54 <rakhmerov> otherwise the process of rebasing my ten commits will be really painful :)
16:42:57 <dzimine> I'll do the reveiws - you said not much chnaged, right?
16:43:03 <rakhmerov> yes
16:43:11 <rakhmerov> minor changes
16:43:22 <dzimine> ok, do ask Manas, I seee (pls email him directly)
16:43:34 <rakhmerov> some of the questions raised in the first 6 commits have been addresed in the last 4 commits
16:43:53 <rakhmerov> dzimine, ok
16:44:16 <rakhmerov> other than that I don't really have anything specific for now to discuss
16:44:24 <rakhmerov> if you do then fire away
16:45:55 <enykeev> dzimine, you can actually pick the last one commit you have reviewed in Old Version History dropdown and it'll only show you the difference between them.
16:48:12 <rakhmerov> yes
16:48:48 <rakhmerov> ok, so let's finish the meeting then?
16:48:54 <dzimine> yes.
16:48:57 <rakhmerov> :)
16:49:04 <rakhmerov> thanks to everyone!
16:49:14 <enykeev> thanks
16:49:17 <rakhmerov> let's meet on Apr 21st
16:49:21 <rakhmerov> bye guys
16:49:32 <rakhmerov> #endmeeting