16:06:33 <akuznetsova> #startmeeting Mistral 16:06:34 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Feb 1 16:06:33 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is akuznetsova. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:06:35 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:06:37 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'mistral' 16:06:50 <akuznetsova> we are a little bit late today 16:07:03 <akuznetsova> so hi again to everyone 16:07:45 <gpaz> akuznetsova, waiting to someone or would you like to start ? 16:07:47 <hparekh_> hello 16:08:32 <akuznetsova> I guess that we can silently start 16:08:56 <akuznetsova> NikolayM, do you know will rakhmerov be here? 16:10:09 <NikolayM> yep, AFAIK he will 16:10:27 <rakhmerov> hi guys 16:10:30 <rakhmerov> sorry for being late 16:10:54 <akuznetsova> rakhmerov, we just start, ready to check action items from previous meeting 16:10:59 <rakhmerov> ok 16:11:01 <rakhmerov> thanks 16:11:07 <hparekh_> hello rakhmerov 16:11:13 <gpaz> Hi Renat 16:11:21 <rakhmerov> hey, how's it going? 16:11:43 <gpaz> all great thanks 16:11:54 <rakhmerov> #topic Review Action items 16:12:00 <akuznetsova> let's back to AIs :-) 16:12:11 <akuznetsova> no, only I can do it) 16:12:16 <akuznetsova> #topic Review Action items 16:12:18 <NikolayM> :) 16:12:24 <akuznetsova> ha-ha 16:12:38 <rakhmerov> what's up? ) 16:12:43 <akuznetsova> 1. rakhmerov, hparekh_: discuss 16:12:43 <akuznetsova> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-items-filtering 16:12:51 <rakhmerov> done 16:12:57 <akuznetsova> nice 16:13:06 <rakhmerov> akuznetsova: will you be driving the meeting? 16:13:09 <NikolayM> what is the result? 16:13:12 <rakhmerov> I'm ok with that 16:13:30 <akuznetsova> rakhmerov, I started it, so only I can set topics ) 16:13:42 <NikolayM> did you decide to do API v3 for it? 16:13:46 <rakhmerov> ooh, I see 16:13:47 <rakhmerov> ok 16:13:52 <rakhmerov> NikolayM: we decided that he will provide an implementation and we'll review it ) 16:14:25 <rakhmerov> my concern was that it may make sense to implement it as part of API v3 but looks like it can be done relatively easy now 16:14:27 <NikolayM> oh, ok, I just saw bp description and emails 16:14:36 <rakhmerov> btw, we still need to review it 16:14:46 <rakhmerov> I haven't still done it 16:14:50 <akuznetsova> need to update status of bp 16:14:59 <rakhmerov> ok, let's move on 16:15:00 <akuznetsova> now it is "not started" 16:15:11 <akuznetsova> 2. rakhmerov: participate in [TripleO] Driving workflows with Mistral 16:15:11 <rakhmerov> hm.. let me update 16:15:50 <rakhmerov> I'm doing this so yes 16:15:54 <rakhmerov> it's being done 16:16:05 <akuznetsova> ok 16:16:14 <akuznetsova> that's all AIs 16:16:16 <rakhmerov> it's pretty huge thread already 16:16:19 <rakhmerov> ok 16:16:25 <akuznetsova> let's move to the next part 16:16:30 <rakhmerov> current status, yep 16:16:50 <akuznetsova> #topic Current Status 16:16:55 <gpaz> I will update for Liat / Gal (UI): 16:17:13 <akuznetsova> gpaz, thanks 16:17:30 <NikolayM> my status: was on vacation last 2 weeks, now I'm back to reviewing process, reviewed a lot of patches today 16:17:34 <hparekh_> Investigating https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-fail-transition-message and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-items-filtering 16:17:56 <gpaz> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=Actions-screen-improvements : I saw that one commit merged today : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259971/ 16:18:14 <rakhmerov> my status: was on a long sick leave (~2 weeks), mostly reviewing patches and participating in ML 16:18:39 <rakhmerov> also discussing security BPs with ALU (particularly Moshe) 16:18:41 <gpaz> Two other commits still in review and need to fix by gal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266826/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269150/ 16:18:51 <akuznetsova> my status: only review 16:19:00 <gpaz> Gal should back next week and continue to work on this commits 16:20:00 <gpaz> Limor started to work this morning on BP barbican action 16:20:01 <akuznetsova> any roadblocks, hanging on review commits ? 16:20:08 <gpaz> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/support-barbican-actions 16:20:43 <gpaz> rakhmerov, so if you can assign the bp on here please 16:21:00 <gpaz> her 16:21:36 <rakhmerov> gpaz: yes, sure 16:21:41 <rakhmerov> gimme a sec 16:21:53 <gpaz> rakhmerov, thank. np 16:22:09 <dmowrer-> working on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-mistral-actions. rakhmerov, sent you an email on the bp January 22. 16:22:10 <rakhmerov> ok, done 16:22:19 <gpaz> rakhmerov, thanks 16:23:06 <rakhmerov> dmowrer-: yeah, I saw it. Sorry, I was absent for a long time and am still processing a chaos that got accumulated during this period ) 16:23:22 <dmowrer-> ok. thanks! 16:23:30 <akuznetsova> can we move to the main topic ? 16:23:32 <rakhmerov> #action rakhmerov: replya to dmowrer- about mistral actions 16:24:02 <rakhmerov> akuznetsova: let's just make sure if anyone else wants to say something 16:24:22 <rakhmerov> are StackStorm guys here? 16:24:28 <rakhmerov> looks like not 16:24:48 <akuznetsova> ok 16:25:02 <akuznetsova> #topic Review M-3 BPs and bugs 16:25:05 <rakhmerov> akuznetsova: ok 16:25:23 <rakhmerov> give me a min pls.. 16:25:39 <akuznetsova> rakhmerov, please, go ahead, that was your topic 16:25:45 <rakhmerov> yep 16:26:45 <rakhmerov> so I just want to go over the BPs and bugs (mostly BPs) assigned to M-3 16:26:56 <rakhmerov> and prioritize them 16:27:01 <rakhmerov> #info https://launchpad.net/mistral/+milestone/mitaka-3 16:27:21 <mgershen> While we wait, I decided to show you this slide from a session I did in Nokia. it shows heat vs mistral progress. cool, right? 16:27:26 <mgershen> http://pasteboard.co/1etg3p3o.png 16:28:53 <rakhmerov> hm.. what does it show? 16:29:01 <rakhmerov> trying to figure out ) 16:29:16 <akuznetsova> activity in specified projects, I guess ) 16:30:03 <mgershen> how much attention did each project get since the start. Heat is clearly under 50 ppl in the first year and we passed that 16:30:03 <rakhmerov> ooh, Mistal started being active in last Aug 16:30:04 <rakhmerov> ok 16:30:14 <rakhmerov> yeah 16:30:32 <rakhmerov> cool ) 16:30:34 <rakhmerov> ok 16:31:09 <rakhmerov> M-3 ends on March 3 16:31:16 <rakhmerov> we have a month till the end 16:31:20 <rakhmerov> so 4 weeks 16:32:38 <rakhmerov> since in M-2 we did not complete everything we intended I moved all not completed stuff to M-3 16:33:30 <rakhmerov> so let's quickly discuss all bps 16:33:33 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/support-barbican-actions 16:33:51 <rakhmerov> this BP has been started by Limor and it's critically important for ALU (Nokia) 16:33:57 <gpaz> Limor is not here, as I update she started working on 16:34:04 <rakhmerov> yep 16:34:12 <rakhmerov> so we need to leave it assigned to M-3 16:34:18 <gpaz> yes 16:34:19 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-making-dsvm-gates-voting 16:34:43 <rakhmerov> honestly, I thing we need to move this one to backlog 16:34:54 <rakhmerov> I think it's too early to make this gate voting 16:35:06 <rakhmerov> it will slow down the development process 16:35:11 <rakhmerov> opinions? 16:35:31 <akuznetsova> wait a sec 16:35:39 <rakhmerov> I'd love to make it voting but first I'd like to get rid of some concurrent bugs that we have 16:35:41 <rakhmerov> yep 16:35:42 <hparekh_> I am also working on to use tempest plugin in dvsm-gate 16:35:54 <rakhmerov> hparekh_: yes, we know 16:36:00 <rakhmerov> it's not too related I think 16:36:15 <akuznetsova> need to wait until we fully move to tempest plugin 16:36:17 <rakhmerov> we're discussing wether or not it should be a voting gate 16:36:22 <rakhmerov> right 16:36:24 <akuznetsova> it should 16:36:32 <hparekh_> hmmm 16:36:40 <akuznetsova> like it all other project 16:36:45 <akuznetsova> projects 16:36:50 <rakhmerov> now? 16:37:05 <akuznetsova> what do you mean? 16:37:06 <rakhmerov> NikolayM: what do you think? 16:37:40 <NikolayM> yea, it should be voting definetely 16:37:47 <NikolayM> but not now 16:37:48 <akuznetsova> we need to make this gate voting, but not now, in the nearest future 16:37:57 <rakhmerov> I mean "eventually it should be voting, true. I'm just not sure we need to make it voting until we have more stable test passing" 16:38:05 <rakhmerov> yes 16:38:12 <NikolayM> +1 16:38:19 <rakhmerov> ok 16:38:49 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-dashboard-cron-trigger-screen 16:39:06 <rakhmerov> gpaz: could you please give an update on this one? 16:39:11 <akuznetsova> afaik, this one is in progress 16:39:13 <rakhmerov> Gal is not here 16:39:15 <gpaz> yes give me a sec 16:39:20 <akuznetsova> I saw the commit 16:39:37 <rakhmerov> yes, it's started. I'm trying to understand if it could be finished in M-3 16:39:52 <rakhmerov> most likely yes but maybe gpaz can share some info 16:40:17 <gpaz> ther are two tasks that Gal should work on Action screen before moving this 16:40:20 <gpaz> but 16:41:09 <gpaz> there is one comit for cron trigger https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269150/ that he need to work on 16:41:42 <rakhmerov> ok 16:41:53 <rakhmerov> let's leave it in M-3 16:42:14 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/use-workflow-id-in-rest-api 16:42:15 <gpaz> He has the create cron trigger and need to complete the cron-trigger screen right after the things I wrote 16:42:24 <rakhmerov> ok 16:42:50 <rakhmerov> I thought this one was done, need to discuss it with Lingxian 16:43:07 <rakhmerov> #action rakhmerov: clarify status of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/use-workflow-id-in-rest-api with Lingxian 16:43:27 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ha-gate 16:43:48 <rakhmerov> akuznetsova: did you have an opportunity to investigate on this BP? 16:44:00 <akuznetsova> oh, that one is on me 16:44:34 <akuznetsova> no, need to discuss what exactly we want to see 16:45:37 <rakhmerov> hm.. ok 16:45:50 <akuznetsova> I can start work on it, but I am not sure that we will finish it in m3 16:46:03 <rakhmerov> I honestly don't believe we can finish it in 1 month 16:46:22 <rakhmerov> and it probably doesn't make sense because not so much was done on HA 16:46:38 <rakhmerov> I'd remove it from M-3 16:46:50 <rakhmerov> akuznetsova: what do you think? 16:47:22 <akuznetsova> agreed, but I will start to think about it 16:47:28 <rakhmerov> or at least we can discuss it with you offline, I think I know what we need to do on this BP 16:47:32 <rakhmerov> ok 16:47:51 <rakhmerov> #action rakhmerov, akuznetsova: discuss https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ha-gate 16:48:27 <rakhmerov> I think the same on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ha-functional-tests 16:48:57 <rakhmerov> or we can narrow it down to just a couple of tests 16:48:57 <akuznetsova> yes, they are connected 16:49:06 <rakhmerov> sort of a PoC 16:49:31 <rakhmerov> I'll remove it for now from M-3 and we'll discuss them together 16:49:35 <rakhmerov> with gate BP 16:49:55 <akuznetsova> ok 16:50:15 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ha-spec 16:50:23 <rakhmerov> that should be done in M-3 IMO 16:50:36 <rakhmerov> because it's a prerequisite for all other HA work 16:50:46 <rakhmerov> I've just assigned it to myself 16:51:17 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-multi-region-support 16:51:43 <rakhmerov> gpaz: I know it was needed by you. Do you know if anyone from ALU is planning to work on it? 16:51:56 <gpaz> I dont think we able to work on this right now 16:52:16 <rakhmerov> I mean within a month 16:52:28 <rakhmerov> ok 16:52:44 <rakhmerov> let's remove it for now 16:52:55 <gpaz> We will be able to know better probably next week if we can take that 16:53:06 <rakhmerov> ok 16:53:07 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-async-actions-doc 16:53:13 <rakhmerov> I will do that 16:53:29 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-alternative-rpc 16:53:30 <gpaz> ok, thanks... I will discussed with Moshe about that , thanks 16:53:57 <rakhmerov> NikolayM: as we discussed you need to participate in that oslo.messaging activity 16:54:12 <rakhmerov> they submitted a BP to add a new API for asynchronous processing 16:54:20 <rakhmerov> do you know the status of it? 16:54:46 <NikolayM> no, I'll check 16:55:06 <NikolayM> and will participate, yes 16:55:13 <rakhmerov> #action NikolayM: check the status of new API in oslo.messaging for async processing 16:55:16 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/actions-screen-improvements 16:55:21 <rakhmerov> gpaz: what about that? 16:55:37 <rakhmerov> I guess we can leave it in M-3, right? 16:55:48 <rakhmerov> I know it was partially done but not sure how much is still left 16:56:35 <gpaz> In our plan, yes 16:56:48 <rakhmerov> ok 16:56:48 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-tempest-plugin 16:57:04 <rakhmerov> this is mostly done, need to review 16:57:14 <hparekh_> yeah 16:57:14 <rakhmerov> same about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-workflow-resource-sharing 16:57:26 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-action-amqp 16:57:42 <rakhmerov> this one is on review but we have a number of concerns about the implementation 16:57:47 <rakhmerov> needs to be finished 16:57:58 <rakhmerov> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-priority-task-scheduler 16:58:11 <rakhmerov> Winson is about to file a spec for it 16:58:22 <rakhmerov> and it's very much needed by SS 16:58:29 <rakhmerov> so let's leave it in M-3 too 16:58:45 <rakhmerov> that's all 16:58:48 <dmowrer-> rakhmerov: could you please add the bp I am working on to M-3? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-mistral-actions 16:58:58 <rakhmerov> ooh, yeah 16:58:59 <rakhmerov> sure 16:59:04 <dmowrer-> thanks! 16:59:15 <akuznetsova> we are out of time 16:59:26 <rakhmerov> done 16:59:30 <rakhmerov> yep 16:59:33 <rakhmerov> just a min 16:59:33 <gpaz> rakhmerov, if I have time for little question 16:59:50 <rakhmerov> ok, we have 13 BPs and half of them are about to be completed 16:59:53 <rakhmerov> gpaz: go ahead 16:59:55 <gpaz> bugs can be fix after M-3 right ? 17:00:14 <akuznetsova> absolutely yes 17:00:20 <gpaz> great thanks 17:00:21 <rakhmerov> yes 17:00:28 <rakhmerov> ok, thanks to everyone for joining 17:00:31 <NikolayM> bye! 17:00:32 <rakhmerov> have a good one 17:00:38 <gpaz> thank you 17:00:39 <rakhmerov> akuznetsova: could you pls end the meeting? 17:00:44 <hparekh_> bye 17:00:46 <rakhmerov> bye 17:00:47 <akuznetsova> #endmeeting