02:01:03 <zhenguo> #startmeeting mogan
02:01:04 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jun 15 02:01:03 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is zhenguo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
02:01:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
02:01:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'mogan'
02:01:11 <zhenguo> o/
02:01:39 <litao__> o/
02:02:34 <zhenguo> liusheng, shaohe_feng, luyao, Xinran, zhangyang: are you here?
02:02:45 <liusheng> o/
02:02:50 <wanghao> miss me
02:02:56 <wanghao> :(
02:02:57 <luyao> o/
02:02:57 <zhenguo> wanghao: hah
02:03:07 <Xinran> o/
02:03:12 <zhenguo> wanghao: I find you say hi before the meeting :D
02:03:19 <wanghao> hhaha
02:03:36 <zhenguo> as always, the agenda:
02:03:36 <zhenguo> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Mogan#Agenda_for_next_meeting
02:03:39 <zhenguo> let's jump in
02:03:47 <zhenguo> #topic announcements and reminders
02:04:07 <zhenguo> We got the first weekly tasks report sent out last week. thansk wanghao!
02:04:15 <liusheng> thanks
02:04:23 <wanghao> my pleasure
02:04:42 <zhangyang> o/
02:05:01 <zhenguo> please remember to update the etherpad to help summarize the report, thanks all
02:05:18 <zhenguo> Our tempest coverage is improved and the work is still going on, thanks liusheng!
02:05:47 <liusheng> zhenguo: np :)
02:05:50 <wanghao> I see it, very cool, God sheng
02:05:58 <zhenguo> hah
02:06:16 <zhenguo> We don't have a time freeze for specs this cycle, but please write specs for you BP soon if it's needed to ensure there's enough time to review.
02:06:17 <liusheng> lol
02:07:13 <zhenguo> Contribution into mogan for the last 30 days
02:07:13 <zhenguo> #link http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/mogan/30
02:07:34 <zhenguo> the review stats is still not looks very well, so also please do more reviews
02:08:20 <zhenguo> And as we are all in a same TZ, I propose to have a 'review hour' every day if it's feasible, wdyt?
02:08:36 <litao__> sure
02:08:40 <wanghao> yeah,  I think it's great
02:08:51 <zhenguo> Not only cores should paticipate, everyone can join or ping others for review during that time.
02:08:56 <liusheng> sounds great!
02:09:08 <wanghao> seems a little better then last week in revies.
02:09:26 <wanghao> good start at least.
02:09:37 <zhenguo> hah, yes, as you all start to review patches
02:09:47 <wanghao> yeah
02:09:51 <zhenguo> which makes us like a real community
02:10:03 <litao__> hah
02:10:30 <zhenguo> and I stop to +A patch directly to let it be fully reviewed
02:11:22 <zhenguo> ok, if you agree, we will find a time
02:11:34 <wanghao> em
02:11:41 <wanghao> maybe 4:30-5:30
02:12:03 <zhenguo> wanghao: hah, as you will end the day by 5:30, right?
02:12:16 <wanghao> yeah, change your brain before go home
02:12:17 <wanghao> haha
02:12:22 <zhenguo> lol
02:12:27 <zhenguo> I'm ok with that time
02:12:28 * litao__ which day?
02:12:34 <wanghao> every day
02:12:56 <zhenguo> is it feasible for everyday?
02:13:08 <liusheng> I am also Ok
02:13:11 <litao__> which day is the review day?
02:13:48 <zhenguo> litao__ not review day, it's review hour
02:14:01 <zhenguo> litao__: so everyday could has a review hour, lol
02:14:27 <wanghao> zhenguo: maybe 1,3,5?
02:14:31 <litao__> zhenguo: ok
02:14:50 <zhenguo> wanghao: sounds good
02:15:01 <liusheng> or 1, 2, 4 lol
02:15:04 <litao__> like hackathon？
02:15:13 <zhenguo> lol
02:15:23 <wanghao> litao__: pretty much
02:15:38 <wanghao> liusheng: haha
02:15:39 <zhenguo> everyday is ok for me...
02:15:57 <zhenguo> or every hour, hah
02:16:04 <wanghao> zhenguo: yeah,
02:16:26 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: wdyt?
02:16:31 <wanghao> zhenguo: we can just try it a week and see if it's ok next week.
02:16:32 <litao__> zhenguo:  you are free
02:16:46 <zhenguo> litao__: not really
02:16:57 <wanghao> 1,2,4 also fine to me
02:17:35 <zhenguo> so 4:30pm to 5:30 pm every 1,2,4
02:17:43 <wanghao> zhenguo: great
02:18:14 <litao__> zhenguo: That's all
02:18:15 <liusheng> +1
02:18:48 <zhenguo> ok, if someone else dissent this, we can discuss later
02:19:40 <zhenguo> not much of announcement, anyone else have a thing here?
02:20:45 <zhenguo> the Sydney Summit presentation is open, we really need a one to show what's mogan
02:21:21 <zhenguo> we got a presentation selected on openstack days china next month :D
02:21:25 <litao__> Sydney is a good place
02:21:40 <liusheng> hope we can go there :)
02:21:58 <wanghao> could we apply a project onboard in Sydney?
02:22:00 <zhenguo> hah, we can prepare more presentatins, if you want to go
02:22:25 <zhenguo> wanghao: seems yes
02:22:33 <wanghao> to introduce Mogan to users like other projects doing in Boston.
02:22:35 <wanghao> yes
02:22:51 <zhenguo> wanghao: not sure if it's allowed for non-official project
02:23:10 <wanghao> zhenguo: yeah, aslo concern that too.
02:23:24 <litao__> so make it official
02:23:39 <zhenguo> litao__: hah
02:24:08 <wanghao> litao__: that's our try too to apply a project onboard
02:24:26 <wanghao> zhenguo: maybe need more information about that.
02:24:33 <litao__> wanghao: yes
02:24:40 <zhenguo> wanghao: yes, will check later, still got time
02:24:46 <wanghao> zhenguo: cool
02:24:59 <zhenguo> ok, let's move on
02:25:14 <zhenguo> #topic task tracking
02:25:24 <zhenguo> #links https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MoganWhiteBoard
02:25:32 * zhenguo gives folks a few minutes to review
02:25:59 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: looks good
02:26:17 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: the time is feasible for you?
02:27:23 <liusheng> zhenguo: need to enrich versioned notifications now ?
02:28:01 <zhenguo> liusheng: yeah, do you have concerns?
02:28:26 <zhenguo> liusheng: before Pike, I think we should got enough notifications
02:28:36 <liusheng> zhenguo: no, just confirm is it high priorities now, hah
02:28:43 <liusheng> zhenguo: ok
02:29:15 <zhenguo> liusheng: hah, you can try to add it for stable API which we will not change before Pike release
02:29:46 <liusheng> zhenguo: ok
02:30:03 <wanghao> zhenguo: we also should mention developers to add notification in new features.
02:30:08 <wanghao> zhenguo: if needed.
02:30:18 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: It's oK
02:30:20 <zhenguo> wanghao: sure
02:30:28 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: ok
02:30:37 <zhenguo> wanghao: also, for quotas, we shold add more
02:30:38 <liusheng> btw, I will spend some time to know placement and think about how to integrate it to Mogan, what do you think ?
02:30:57 <liusheng> wanghao: agreed
02:31:00 <zhenguo> liusheng: sure
02:31:13 <zhenguo> liusheng: I will add you to the new flavor bp with me
02:31:19 <wanghao> zhenguo: yes
02:31:23 <liusheng> zhenguo: ok
02:32:14 <shaohe_feng> liusheng: great.
02:32:30 <liusheng> shaohe_feng: :D
02:32:54 <wanghao> liusheng: consider we can support placement in scheduler, but not sure if it could be now.
02:33:37 <zhenguo> wanghao: besides node aggregates thing, we can move to that directly after the refactoring of flavor, hah
02:34:08 <litao__> liusheng: is it high  priority for placement?
02:34:09 <zhenguo> so node aggregates spec needs to wait for a while
02:34:14 <liusheng> zhenguo: yes, that like what nova does now
02:34:25 <wanghao> zhenguo: do you think we should support two scheduler way?
02:34:48 <wanghao> zhenguo: placement or our own.
02:34:52 <zhenguo> if the community are moving to placement, there's no reason for us not to
02:35:00 <wanghao> emm, sure
02:35:08 <liusheng> litao__: may be, we need to reduce the burden which may will be bigger if we swith late
02:35:35 <zhenguo> wanghao: we will still have a scheduler, placement only for resouces tracking
02:35:41 <litao__> liusheng: sure
02:35:44 <zhenguo> we will move our compute nodes there
02:35:49 <wanghao> zhenguo: btw,  if there is no big issue in adopt node,  we can prepare to code it next week.
02:35:56 <zhenguo> mogan will not store baremetal resources
02:35:58 <wanghao> zhenguo: yeah, I see.
02:36:35 <zhenguo> wanghao: yes, you can start coding I think, will try to make more people review that spec
02:37:07 <litao__> zhenguo: I will work with wanghao to fullfill adoption
02:37:14 <zhenguo> wanghao: aha, today is Thursday, our review hour..
02:37:29 <zhenguo> litao__ : thanks
02:37:49 <zhenguo> litao__: and if you like, you can also do quotas together with wanghao :D
02:38:08 <litao__> zhenguo: yeah, I will
02:38:13 <zhenguo> ok
02:38:28 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: I　develop new devstack with nova
02:38:44 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: it can use placement now
02:39:03 <zhenguo> shahe_feng: yes, nova has moved to placement
02:39:27 <zhenguo> but we should find a way to use placement aggregates for our nodes aggregates
02:39:50 <zhenguo> so I will not update the node aggregates spec recently until we got a outcome
02:40:14 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: agree.
02:41:00 <zhenguo> wanghao: for adopting servers, we will not save the manageable nodes right?
02:41:43 <wanghao> zhenguo: sure, and thanks litao_
02:41:56 <wanghao> zhenguo: yes
02:42:15 <wanghao> zhenguo: just get them from driver and show them to user diectly
02:42:16 <zhenguo> wanghao: ok
02:43:00 <litao__> so it is simple
02:43:20 <zhenguo> yes
02:43:35 <zhenguo> another thing I want to discuss is the port_type support
02:44:00 <zhenguo> as ironic now support vif_attach and vif_detach, so we will move to use that API
02:44:13 <zhenguo> but it's not support pass hints for physical ports to use
02:44:29 <zhenguo> so we will lose the ability to specifying port_type when claiming a server
02:44:43 <zhenguo> but the right approach is to push ironic support this, wdyt?
02:45:53 <wanghao> zhenguo: I see now Mogan use port_type just to match the physical port from Ironic.
02:46:47 <zhenguo> wanghao: yes
02:47:03 <wanghao> zhenguo: so you mean we will pass the port_type to Ironic?
02:47:40 <zhenguo> wanghao: yes, but ironic api doens't support it
02:48:48 <litao__> zhenguo: yeah , maybe we can push it to ironic project
02:48:59 <wanghao> zhenguo: How Ironic to use the port_type?
02:50:01 <zhenguo> wanghao: in fact, ironic now support vif_attach api, so we only need to pass a neutron port_id to it then it will choose one physical port to associate
02:50:26 <zhenguo> wanghao: we don't need to list all ports and select one ourselves, and set extra/vif_port_id to ironic
02:50:41 <wanghao> zhenguo: ah  I see
02:51:01 <zhenguo> wanghao: so I would like to make ironic vif attach api support some more hints to the physical port
02:51:24 <zhenguo> wanghao: at least something like tag should be supported and I think it make sense
02:51:38 <litao__> zhenguo: I remember it is done by nova rather than ironic
02:52:01 <zhenguo> litao__ : nova has changed to just call ironic.vif_attach
02:52:14 <wanghao> zhenguo: I see,  you mean we put the associate process down to Ironic.
02:52:24 <zhenguo> wanghao: yes
02:52:47 <zhenguo> wanghao: ironic now just sort the port and choose the first available one
02:53:08 <zhenguo> wanghao: it's move flexible to let ironic know which type of port we want to use
02:53:20 <wanghao> zhenguo: emm agree
02:53:32 <wanghao> zhenguo: it should be supported in Ironic
02:53:52 <zhenguo> wanghao:yes, so we can just drop that support provisionally
02:54:53 <zhenguo> Xinran: hi, please continue the refactor of vif_attach/detach, thanks!
02:55:44 <wanghao> zhenguo: remove port_type in creation server?  I think it's no harmful even if we keep it now.
02:56:04 <wanghao> zhenguo: since we didn't use it well.
02:56:37 <zhenguo> wanghao: but if we change to use ironic vif_attach, we can't support that
02:57:57 <zhenguo> we can pass it down to ironic driver, but can't pass it to ironic :(
02:58:26 <wanghao> zhenguo: emm,  okay,  I see your point.  maybe we remove it.  let's see the code
02:58:31 <litao__> zhenguo:sounds good
02:58:47 <zhenguo> ok
02:58:55 <zhenguo> it's almost time
02:59:23 <zhenguo> we can move to next topic if there is not things want to discuss here
02:59:32 <zhenguo> #topic open discussion
02:59:43 <zhenguo> who's got a thing here
02:59:51 <Xinran> ok, i will do it soon
03:00:01 <zhenguo> Xinran: thanks
03:00:44 <zhenguo> thanks y'all
03:00:50 <wanghao> bye
03:00:57 <zhenguo> #endmeeting