15:00:51 <rhochmuth> #startmeeting monasca
15:00:53 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jun 29 15:00:51 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rhochmuth. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:55 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:57 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca'
15:01:00 <rhochmuth> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda
15:01:09 <rhochmuth> 1.	Monasca Newton mid-cycle
15:01:09 <rhochmuth> 1.	Where: Remote via WebEx
15:01:09 <rhochmuth> 2.	Date: July 19th and July 20th 2016
15:01:09 <rhochmuth> 3.	https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca_newton_midcycle
15:01:09 <rhochmuth> 2.	Discuss the bluprint:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/monasca/+spec/notification-engine-plugin
15:01:10 <rhochmuth> 3.	Multi-step Alarm Definition Form
15:01:10 <rhochmuth> •	https://review.openstack.org/331582
15:01:11 <rhochmuth> •	https://review.openstack.org/332731/
15:01:11 <rhochmuth> 3. Other reviews
15:01:12 <rhochmuth> •	https://review.openstack.org/327000/
15:01:12 <rhochmuth> •	https://review.openstack.org/327481/
15:01:13 <rhochmuth> hi everyone
15:01:15 <rhochmuth> o/
15:01:17 <iurygregory> o/
15:01:18 <koji> o/
15:01:19 <silvamatteus> o/
15:01:23 <witek> hi
15:01:23 <shinya_kwbt> o/
15:01:26 <hosanai> o/
15:01:29 <slogan> o/
15:01:29 <Quentin_> o/
15:01:33 <arturbasiak> o/
15:01:42 <cbellucci> o/
15:01:49 <tomasztrebski> o/
15:01:57 <rhochmuth> is that all that is hear today?
15:02:00 <bklei> o/
15:02:06 <rhochmuth> your late
15:02:09 <bklei> sorry
15:02:17 <rhochmuth> np
15:02:32 <rhochmuth> i'm in teacher mode i guess
15:02:42 <bklei> instruct away!
15:03:04 <rhochmuth> let's see, i wanted to cover some high-level stuff
15:03:24 <rhochmuth> The Monasca Newton Mid-Cycle date, time and location has been set
15:03:40 <rhochmuth> There is also an Etherpad at, https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca_newton_midcycle
15:03:53 <rhochmuth> If folks want to start adding topics to the agenda that would be great
15:04:07 <rhochmuth> We'll be using Webex for the mid-cycle
15:04:19 <rhochmuth> Courtesy of Fabio and Cisco
15:04:42 <rhochmuth> I also wanted to mentiion the Barcelona Summit again
15:04:55 <rhochmuth> Currently thinking about the following:
15:05:05 <rhochmuth> 1. One hand-on session similar to Ausint
15:05:21 <rhochmuth> 2. One Hands-on session that is more about deployment and getting up and running
15:05:50 <rhochmuth> 3. Monasca Overview covering new features, components, deployments, integrations with over openstack projects, ...
15:06:07 <rhochmuth> If folks are interested please let me know
15:06:22 <rhochmuth> witek and I are planning on some of t his right now
15:06:41 <witek> yes, we could definitely contribute on 1 and 3
15:06:47 <rhochmuth> but i'm completely open to others taking this on too
15:06:50 <rhochmuth> thx witek
15:06:51 <witek> with 2 i'm not sure yey
15:06:53 <witek> yet
15:06:59 <rhochmuth> i dont' wnat o monopoize all of this
15:07:05 <rhochmuth> even though it probably seems that way
15:07:12 <rhochmuth> i'm just trying to get things started
15:07:30 <rhochmuth> we'll also run monasca design summit sessions, similar to austin
15:07:44 <rhochmuth> which we can hopefully this time around get into more techical discussions
15:08:18 <rhochmuth> also, july 13th is the deadline for barcelona submissions
15:08:31 <rhochmuth> this advertisement brought to you by openstack
15:09:18 <rhochmuth> so, i woudl like to move on to the next topic
15:09:23 <shinya_kwbt> I'm interesting in 1 and 2. But I have no confidence of English.
15:09:40 <rhochmuth> thx shinya_kwbt
15:10:00 <bklei> i'd be interested in helping, but not looking good for travel to barcelona for us new charter guys
15:10:11 <bklei> should know more next week
15:10:27 <tomasztrebski> assuming it will be possible for me to come, I will coordinate with Witek or you
15:10:29 <shinya_kwbt> But I can write manuscript before summit.
15:10:46 <rhochmuth> thx bklei
15:10:54 <rhochmuth> thank tomasz
15:11:11 <rhochmuth> so let's coordinate offline via email then if that works for folks
15:11:27 <rhochmuth> if anyone else want to get invovled feel free to contact me
15:11:33 <bklei> thumbsup
15:11:50 <rhochmuth> #topic https://blueprints.launchpad.net/monasca/+spec/notification-engine-plugin
15:11:59 <rhochmuth> so, we have a new bp proposal
15:12:05 <rhochmuth> some code has already been posted
15:12:26 <rhochmuth> haneef: are you here
15:12:30 <haneef_> yes
15:12:49 <rhochmuth> so, i'll let you walk people through this and then they can ask questions
15:13:02 <rhochmuth> and follow-up
15:13:05 <rhochmuth> the floor is yours
15:13:12 <haneef_> Basically it is an ability to add new notification types ( hipchat, slack, anything of your choice) without any code change
15:13:32 <haneef_> All you need to write is a plugin for the new notification types
15:13:42 <bklei> awesome idea
15:13:59 <iurygregory> +1 very good idea =)
15:14:00 <ericksonsantos_> sounds great
15:14:12 <rhochmuth> i never get that
15:14:22 <bklei> you're not haneef :)
15:14:30 <haneef_> -- There are 3 changes.  Remove hardcoded enum from monasca-api,  add plugin support in monasca-notification, add new REST api to get supported notification-types and corresponding change in monasca-client
15:15:24 <rhochmuth> i've reviewed and it all looks good to me
15:15:28 <haneef_> Any questions or clarifications?
15:15:48 <witek> the change in monasca-api is only in Java
15:15:52 <bklei> all sounds good to me -- one request -- please merge the changes to all 3 repos at the same time (or close to it), so folks don't get blocked from bringing in any of the repos
15:16:10 <rhochmuth> the change will also be in the python api
15:16:21 <haneef_> Will also be in python-api
15:16:31 <rhochmuth> haneef: would it be possible to do python api in same review for java?
15:16:41 <bklei> +1
15:16:48 <haneef_> Yes. Will add python-api too
15:16:52 <rhochmuth> thx
15:18:19 <tomasztrebski> I had just one remark that I put in the comment, but I think that you will refactor the change to handle that, right ? I am telling about the fact that new notifications aren't in fact pluggable
15:18:31 <haneef_> yes
15:18:47 <tomasztrebski> btw: I also like that change :D
15:19:41 <rhochmuth> ok, unless there are more comments/questions for haneef_, i think we are done on this topic
15:19:50 <rhochmuth> does anyone want to write an irc plugin
15:20:01 <tomasztrebski> ]:->
15:20:07 <tomasztrebski> tempting....
15:20:29 <rhochmuth> does tinder support plugins?
15:20:43 <rhochmuth> never mind
15:20:59 <rhochmuth> thanks haneef_
15:21:01 <bklei> oh man
15:21:26 <rhochmuth> so, let's close on this topic and we can move on to other fun stuff
15:21:58 <rhochmuth> #topic 	3.	Multi-step Alarm Definition Form
15:21:58 <rhochmuth> •	https://review.openstack.org/331582
15:21:58 <rhochmuth> •	https://review.openstack.org/332731/
15:22:23 <witek> I wanted to bring some attention to Tomasz' changes
15:22:28 <witek> in the UI
15:22:43 <witek> which allow to define alarms with logical operators
15:22:56 <tomasztrebski> these are "really" small changes :)
15:24:46 <rhochmuth> so, it sounds like you are looking for some review from outside of fujitsu
15:24:47 <shinya_kwbt> Really?? 	+480, -203	changed! you are tough!!
15:25:33 <rhochmuth> bklei and shinya_kwbt probably should take a look at this
15:25:34 <shinya_kwbt> I will test tommorrow.
15:25:37 <rhochmuth> thx
15:25:39 <tomasztrebski> second one is even bigger, had to do some angular there...quite a lot actually
15:25:44 <witek> shinya_kwbt: thanks
15:26:06 <tomasztrebski> well this is monasca and fujitsu, if it would be up to me or witek that would be merged already, but that's for the community to decide
15:26:17 <bklei> rhochmuth: will try to pull in and test today or tomorrow, looked at the code and seemed OK to me
15:26:31 <tomasztrebski> basically multi-step change gives better look@feel matched to horizon and a room to put more expressions in the same page
15:26:44 <witek> thanks Brad
15:26:59 <bklei> np
15:27:00 <tomasztrebski> multi-expression adds the feature known for long from monaca-client
15:27:05 <tomasztrebski> thx guys :)
15:28:01 <rhochmuth> i'll look at the final ui after it is merged
15:28:13 <rhochmuth> and probably be in awe
15:28:22 <tomasztrebski> I thought you already are ;-)
15:29:22 <rhochmuth> #topic 3. Other reviews
15:29:22 <rhochmuth> •	https://review.openstack.org/327000/
15:29:22 <rhochmuth> •	https://review.openstack.org/327481/
15:29:45 <rhochmuth> i just reviewed again prior to the meeting and +1'd
15:29:52 <rhochmuth> seems like it is ready to merge
15:29:57 <rhochmuth> thanks tomasz
15:30:33 <bklei> tomasz -- good news, we're going to start pulling in and playing with monasca-log-api at twc/charter
15:30:54 <rhochmuth> great news
15:30:55 <witek> great
15:31:04 <witek> what is charter?
15:31:06 <tomasztrebski> <3 <3 <3 <3
15:31:14 <bklei> the company that bought twc
15:31:26 <tomasztrebski> I hope you are going to like that ;-)
15:31:32 <bklei> time will tell :)
15:31:54 <tomasztrebski> http://www.charter.net/
15:31:55 <tomasztrebski> that one ?
15:32:05 <bklei> yup
15:32:23 <bklei> they bought/acquired us and brighthouse
15:32:35 <rhochmuth> if things dont' workout at charter you can always come back
15:32:48 <bklei> :) or we could hire u?
15:33:28 <rhochmuth> maybe i could start writing code again then
15:33:42 <bklei> and u could get free cable
15:34:20 <rhochmuth> so, besides me, is someone else going to review that code
15:34:26 <rhochmuth> for tomasz
15:34:31 <rhochmuth> bklei?
15:34:41 <rhochmuth> i'll ping tsv as well
15:34:44 <bklei> sure, will look now
15:34:55 <rhochmuth> thx bklei
15:35:09 <bklei> don't know that code well but will look
15:35:15 <tomasztrebski> I'd appreciate guys that handle monasca-agent or thresh to look at new metrics...especially naming and if chosen meters are correct (i.e. gauge for that, counter for that)
15:35:27 <tomasztrebski> for naming I think we should be done
15:36:47 <rhochmuth> so, i think that is a wrap on today's topics
15:37:01 <rhochmuth> i can open it up for open discussion now
15:37:14 <rhochmuth> if anyone has somethign else that they would like to discuss
15:37:19 <tomasztrebski> I'd like to ask some help here
15:37:28 <bklei> one from me -- hope to have a review up for new dimensions api this week if all goes well
15:37:44 <bklei> this will help grafana templating
15:37:59 <tomasztrebski> I am no bash expert and maybe that change is not worth it but if someone could look at > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333738/ I'd appreciate that
15:38:31 <tomasztrebski> change explains itself, so I won't take time here and discuss that
15:38:56 <rhochmuth> the change looks fine to me
15:39:06 <rhochmuth> i was in the process of testign and got side tracked
15:39:25 <rhochmuth> i'm assuming if it installs in devstack i'll just merge it
15:39:42 <tomasztrebski> this is for me or bklei ?
15:39:46 <tomasztrebski> * to me
15:39:52 <rhochmuth> to u
15:40:17 <rhochmuth> bklei: do you have a bp or discussion on the dimensions resource
15:40:30 <slogan> tomasztrebski: looks ok, but why the '>>' to /dev/null vs '>' - appending doesn't really make sense to the bitbucket
15:40:42 <bklei> only what we discussed here a couple weeks ago rhochmuth
15:41:48 <bklei> tomasztrebski and witek -- one of our engineers here looking at logging has some questions -- ok to connect you with him (nathan)?
15:42:04 <witek> sure
15:42:07 <bklei> thx
15:43:27 <rhochmuth> tomasz see slogan's question above
15:43:56 <slogan> it's no giant deal, works either way, just a nit :-)
15:44:14 <rhochmuth> thx slogan
15:44:32 <rhochmuth> btw slogan, are you planning on submitting broadview for barcelona
15:44:46 <rhochmuth> you can submit again
15:44:49 <slogan> I think we are forced to sit out this year
15:45:16 <slogan> travel got tight
15:45:32 <rhochmuth> yeah, barcelona is expensive
15:45:33 <slogan> that said, I'm open to producing content
15:45:40 <slogan> even if I can't be there
15:46:10 <rhochmuth> thx
15:46:29 <rhochmuth> will possibly take you up on that
15:46:40 <rhochmuth> bklei: so what are you planning on doing with dimensions resource
15:46:57 <slogan> rhochmuth: please do
15:47:58 <bklei> pretty simple rhochmuth -- for a given dimension name -- list all the values
15:48:11 <bklei> right now templating does a full metric-list -- expensive
15:48:15 <tomasztrebski> btw, would you guys be opened to some sort of validate_expression method in API, I am asking from the monasca-ui POV
15:48:53 <bklei> tomasztrebski the alternative is the alarm def create fails?
15:49:43 <tomasztrebski> current validation in monasca-ui that happens during editing of alarm definition has a bug I guess, if you create compound expression from CLI and want to edit that in UI it is not always possible
15:50:01 <tomasztrebski> the method in EditAlarmForm says that "value must be a number" as far as I remember
15:50:47 <bklei> i think i've seen that -- and been forced to CLI -- changes welcome in the UI there!
15:51:28 <tomasztrebski> it would be API+UI and I would have to discuss that first with my PO, but if he accepts I might be able to push that to review
15:52:09 <bklei> bueno
15:54:06 <tomasztrebski> ok, so I will discuss that and either create BP or bug for that, most likely I bug since that should be possible to be done
15:54:14 <tomasztrebski> *a bug
15:56:49 <rhochmuth> thx tomasz
15:57:01 <rhochmuth> i think we are done for today
15:57:32 <tomasztrebski> that was unusual meeting, all those before I remember that we always ran out of time ;-)
15:57:55 <bklei> thx rhochmuth
15:58:11 <rhochmuth> thx everyone
15:58:17 <witek> thanks Roland, thanks everyone
15:58:34 <tomasztrebski> cheers....now shower....
15:58:35 <tomasztrebski> :D
15:58:41 <rhochmuth> tmi
15:58:45 <tomasztrebski> bye and see you all next time
15:58:56 <rhochmuth> #endmeeting