15:00:04 <rhochmuth> #startmeeting monasca
15:00:05 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Aug  3 15:00:04 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rhochmuth. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:08 <rhochmuth> o/
15:00:09 <iurygregory> o/
15:00:10 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca'
15:00:12 <rbak> o/
15:00:14 <bklei> o/
15:00:19 <shinya_kwbt> o/
15:00:20 <rhochmuth> agenda is posted at, https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda
15:00:26 <rhochmuth> Agenda for Wednesday August 3, 2016 (15:00 UTC)
15:00:26 <rhochmuth> 1.	Events api status
15:00:26 <rhochmuth> 2.	Reviews:
15:00:26 <rhochmuth> 1.	https://review.openstack.org/#/c/341210
15:00:26 <rhochmuth> 2.	https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347481
15:00:27 <rhochmuth> 3.	Cassandra update
15:00:30 <silvamatteus> o/
15:00:53 <Fdaisuke_> o/
15:01:11 <rhochmuth> Hi everyone, the agenda looks a little light right now, so if there are more topics to discuss please post in the etherpad
15:01:19 <rhochmuth> the ether pad link is above
15:01:36 <rhochmuth> We might as well get started then
15:01:48 <rhochmuth> #topic Events api status
15:02:10 <rhochmuth> Who posted this topic?
15:02:22 <rbak> that would be me
15:02:34 <rbak> I was just curious what the state of this was?
15:02:44 <rbak> I haven't heard anything about it in a while
15:03:09 <rhochmuth> Are you referring to the big events api that had the events transform and events engine components?
15:03:38 <rbak> I assume so
15:04:05 <rhochmuth> Currently, it is being worked on
15:04:48 <rhochmuth> It is moving up in priority again though, so we might be able to start working on it again soon
15:04:55 <rhochmuth> from an HPE perspective
15:05:00 <igorn> o/
15:05:08 <rhochmuth> We will start from scratch though
15:05:32 <rhochmuth> and look at other technologies and approached
15:05:38 <rhochmuth> approaches
15:05:53 <rhochmuth> why are you asking
15:06:03 <rhochmuth> is this an area that you are interested in developing?
15:06:29 <rbak> We had a couple use cases that came up this week and I was just wondering what the status was.
15:06:49 <rhochmuth> what are the use cases?
15:07:44 <rbak> We have someone who started looking at the log api, and was curious about support for detecting and alarming on events based on logs.
15:08:09 <rbak> I don't know the details, I'm just collecting information to pass along.
15:08:55 <rhochmuth> so, you could start to do that already using logstash to detect specific log messages, and then publishing a metric to the Kafka metrics topic
15:09:47 <rbak> Yeah, I think that's what we're looking at, but metrics and events were going to have separate apis at one point.  Hence my question about the event api.
15:10:56 <rhochmuth> the direction that we are headed as well as Fujitsu at the moment is to use the logging API along with Logstash, to then create metrics that can be alarmed on, and notificaitons sent
15:11:22 <rhochmuth> the work around the determinisitic alarms, whcih is complete, was to help address this area
15:11:28 <rbak> So are we scrapping the idea of a separate events api?
15:11:36 <rhochmuth> there are some other features that are in progress too
15:11:52 <rhochmuth> such as the locked/latched alarms and sporadic metrics
15:12:11 <rhochmuth> no, we aren't scrappign the events api
15:12:19 <rhochmuth> like i said it is moving up in priority within hpe
15:12:35 <rhochmuth> so we might start to develop it again
15:12:56 <rhochmuth> it just won't be based on some of the internal technologies and libraries that we had originally used
15:14:29 <rhochmuth> so, should we move onto the next topic?
15:14:41 <rbak> Sure, that's all I needed
15:14:47 <rhochmuth> #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/341210
15:14:57 <bklei> that's me
15:15:13 <bklei> i've tested it locally, looks good for a first cut at a solidfire plugin
15:15:29 <bklei> we've got ideas on how to extend it -- actually having lunch with chris today
15:15:35 <bklei> but any objections to merging?
15:15:44 <rhochmuth> i don't have any objections
15:15:50 <rhochmuth> i already +1'd
15:15:55 <rhochmuth> i can't run this plugin
15:16:05 <rhochmuth> so, i've done code, naming conventions review
15:16:16 <bklei> perfect -- i'll merge today then.
15:16:22 <rhochmuth> if you've run it and it loks good you are much further than me
15:16:32 <rhochmuth> are you the primary reason this was developed
15:16:39 <bklei> yeah, we have a SF cluster -- worked good in the lab
15:16:41 <rhochmuth> i'm just wondering how the plugin came to be
15:17:04 <rhochmuth> thx
15:17:05 <bklei> we talked with them in austin -- i was going to write it -- but they took the lead
15:17:22 <rhochmuth> please feel free to merge. i believe you have +2 privs
15:17:28 <bklei> thx
15:17:54 <rhochmuth> #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347481
15:18:14 <bklei> sorry -- me again :)
15:18:30 <bklei> read only api -- wondering if anyone else needs time to review or test
15:18:48 <rhochmuth> i haven't reviewed it yet
15:18:57 <rhochmuth> i briefly looked at it
15:19:12 <bklei> np
15:19:14 <rhochmuth> but it looks like rbrandt and tomasz are involved
15:19:23 <bklei> yeah, i think they're good
15:19:32 <rhochmuth> and i'm assuming if they've approved it is in good shape
15:19:41 <bklei> ok
15:19:43 <rhochmuth> i still need to look it over
15:19:51 <bklei> np, will wait for u
15:20:06 <rhochmuth> also looks like craig looked at it
15:20:27 <bklei> yup
15:21:05 <rhochmuth> #topic Cassandra update
15:21:44 <rhochmuth> So, last meeting we decided we would check with our organizations on getting resources
15:21:45 <shinya_kwbt> I pushed devstack plugin.
15:22:02 <rhochmuth> Ahhh, yes shinya
15:22:09 <shinya_kwbt> sorry please go ahead.
15:22:12 <rhochmuth> That is really useful
15:22:18 <rhochmuth> thx
15:22:44 <rhochmuth> so, witek has told me that it looks like they will be able to work on this
15:23:03 <rhochmuth> DT is still in the process of checking
15:23:19 <rhochmuth> I'm also in the process of checkign for HPE, but I don't have an absolute answer today
15:23:31 <rhochmuth> so, next week i should no more
15:23:52 <rhochmuth> shinya_kwbt: I think you should provide an update on status
15:24:31 <shinya_kwbt> There are api and persister and devstack. But these are reviewing.
15:24:41 <shinya_kwbt> There are some comments in api.
15:24:54 <shinya_kwbt> So I will fix api after meeting.
15:25:10 <rhochmuth> thx
15:25:37 <shinya_kwbt> Devstack is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349751/ and there are links for api and persister.
15:25:50 <rhochmuth> other than what other reviewers are thinking, i think this is ready
15:26:09 <rhochmuth> i think i mentioned that i tested everything in DevStack, and all appears to be functional
15:26:25 <rhochmuth> some folks from DT had some comments on potential performance improvements
15:26:35 <rhochmuth> but i think we can follow-up and address those as we move along
15:27:01 <rhochmuth> so, merging so this is available for everyone, and then starting the process of enhancements, seems like a good idea
15:27:32 <rhochmuth> i'm thinking i might add some blueprints based on the email discussions so far so we can track the areas a bit better
15:29:08 <rhochmuth> i think we are a little light on attendance today to continue the Cassandra discussion
15:29:16 <rhochmuth> i'll just open up at this time
15:29:26 <rhochmuth> #topic open floor
15:29:43 <rhochmuth> Does anyone have any other topics, questions, issues to discuss today
15:29:47 <rhochmuth> we have a 1/2 hour left
15:31:16 <rhochmuth> going once, going twice
15:31:48 <rhochmuth> ok, i'm going to close the meeting down then
15:31:58 <rhochmuth> thanks everyone
15:32:03 <bklei> cya
15:32:14 <rhochmuth> #endmeeting