15:00:20 <rhochmuth> #startmeeting monasca 15:00:22 <rhochmuth> o/ 15:00:24 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov 2 15:00:20 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rhochmuth. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:25 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:28 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca' 15:00:29 <rhochmuth> o/ 15:01:07 <rhochmuth> Agenda for Wednesday November 2, 2016 (15:00 UTC) 15:01:07 <rhochmuth> 1. Reviews: 15:01:07 <rhochmuth> 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375717/ 15:01:07 <rhochmuth> 2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351930/ 15:01:07 <rhochmuth> 2. Update on the state of group_by? 15:01:15 <rhochmuth> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda 15:01:24 <bklei> o/ 15:01:27 <rhochmuth> anyone here? 15:01:42 <bklei> light crowd today 15:01:56 <rhochmuth> anyone here besides bklei? 15:02:03 <hosanai> o/ 15:02:14 <rhochmuth> hi 15:02:22 <rbak> o/ 15:02:28 <rhochmuth> well, we might as well get started 15:02:32 <rhochmuth> i still have jet lag 15:02:49 <rhochmuth> #topic https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda 15:03:00 <rhochmuth> #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375717/ 15:03:11 <bklei> that's me 15:03:26 <rhochmuth> so, it looks like this is ready to be merged based on the comments and +1's 15:03:28 <bklei> this is add'l metadata to publish vm and tenant names to infra project 15:03:37 <bklei> i think so too 15:04:14 <bklei> u ok to merge then? 15:04:22 <rhochmuth> you may have the honors 15:04:30 <bklei> bueno! 15:04:57 <rhochmuth> #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351930/ 15:05:09 <rhochmuth> it is in merge conflict 15:05:22 <rhochmuth> other than that i thought it was ready to go 15:05:42 <rhochmuth> did you test it at all 15:05:43 <bklei> that's mr. brandt's -- group by 15:05:48 <rhochmuth> yup 15:06:10 <bklei> we haven't pulled it in to test -- the code looks good. 15:06:21 <rhochmuth> i was about to merge the other day, but another merge put it in conflict state again 15:06:37 <bklei> is ryan around to rebase? 15:06:38 <rhochmuth> rbrabdt: u there? 15:06:47 <rhochmuth> rbrandt: u there? 15:07:11 <rhochmuth> i think my team is having a planning meeting without me 15:07:18 <rhochmuth> as usual 15:07:26 <bklei> :) 15:07:27 <hosanai> hahaha 15:07:28 <rhochmuth> he's not on-line 15:07:39 <rhochmuth> i think they do it on purpose 15:08:29 <rhochmuth> i hipchatted him and let him know 15:08:49 <rhochmuth> so, hopefully later today we can merge that one 15:09:24 <rhochmuth> ok, maybe later today 15:09:50 <rhochmuth> is that the entire agenda? 15:09:55 <bklei> sweet -- that's all charter had 15:10:08 <rhochmuth> how are you making out with grafana 3? 15:10:16 <rhochmuth> and keystone integration? 15:10:31 <rbak> It's going to be grafana 4 soon 15:10:37 <rhochmuth> oh yeah 15:10:56 <rbak> But the keystone integration has been silent. No word from rain tank lately. 15:11:14 <rbak> I'll try to get their attention again. 15:11:15 <rhochmuth> ok, thx 15:11:25 <rhochmuth> i was hoping for a break-through 15:11:51 <rhochmuth> we've also been given the silent tratment from elasitc about adding support for keystone to kibana 15:12:46 <rhochmuth> hosanai: do you have any topics? 15:13:07 <hosanai> in last week we made an use-case for monasca-analytics (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca_analytics). I'm wondering if we have more that kind of use-cases or pain points in large env like charter 15:15:45 <hosanai> I would like to have use-cases like it based on actual problems 15:15:54 <rhochmuth> hosanai: sounds good 15:16:11 <rhochmuth> i think we could start to build up a catalog of use cases 15:16:20 <rhochmuth> similar to how that one was written up 15:16:42 <hosanai> yeah, sounds great! 15:16:45 <rhochmuth> i like that one, because i though it would be "simpler" to implement 15:17:03 <rhochmuth> and fit in with the ElasticSearch and Kibana 15:17:24 <rhochmuth> a very compelling use case, that we don't have to build a lot of extra infrastructure around 15:18:05 <hosanai> rhochmuth: i see 15:18:14 <rhochmuth> i spent a good amount of time trying to understand LDA and Dirichlet distributions 15:18:39 <rhochmuth> but, i still have to study more 15:19:36 <rhochmuth> i think some other use cases that can be added are 15:19:37 <hosanai> rhochmuth: ok, i will submit WIP state of LDA soon 15:19:47 <rhochmuth> anomaly detection for metrics 15:19:54 <rhochmuth> i could write-up that one too 15:20:35 <hosanai> which algorizm do you use? 15:20:40 <rhochmuth> i would be interested in understanding how the LINGAM algorithm workds differently than LDA 15:21:16 <rhochmuth> i don't have a specific algorihm in mind for anomaly detection in metrics, other than what I've used in the past 15:21:44 <hosanai> mean algorithm in your branch? 15:21:52 <rhochmuth> yeah 15:22:40 <hosanai> I didn't play with LNGAM but it's usuful to reduce operator's work 15:22:49 <hosanai> i think 15:22:59 <rhochmuth> ok, i'm going to head-off to another meeting 15:23:19 <rhochmuth> see you next week 15:23:24 <hosanai> bye 15:23:32 <rhochmuth> #endmeeting