14:00:25 <witek> #startmeeting monasca
14:00:25 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Sep 13 14:00:25 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is witek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:27 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:30 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca'
14:00:55 <witek> hello everyone
14:01:01 <cbellucci> o/
14:01:05 <koji> o/
14:01:09 <rhochmuth> o/
14:01:32 <witek> small group today
14:01:43 <yavor_OP5> hi!
14:01:56 <tobiajo> hi all
14:02:01 <witek> the agenda is as usual here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca_queens_midcycle
14:02:04 <witek> oops
14:02:07 <witek> wrong one :)
14:02:08 <akiraYo> hi
14:02:19 <witek> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda
14:02:45 <witek> #topic mid-cycle planning
14:03:02 <witek> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca_queens_midcycle
14:03:32 <witek> The agenda is filling in
14:04:08 <witek> at the end of our mid-cycle meeting I would like to be able to create a list of priorities for the Queens cycle
14:04:18 <sc> I think we have too many things on Wednesday, we need to rebalance
14:04:53 <witek> might be true
14:05:31 <witek> I'll move OpenStack wide goals then
14:06:24 <sc> it sounds better now
14:06:32 <witek> rhochmuth: can someone from your team speak about Helm installer and docker-compose?
14:07:26 <rhochmuth> i think so
14:07:28 <rhochmuth> will have to check
14:07:59 <rhochmuth> but, tim buckley or michael hoppal would be good to cover that topic
14:08:10 <witek> yes, they are the experts
14:08:38 <witek> someone has added tripleO
14:08:54 <witek> any details about it?
14:09:19 <rhochmuth> i don't know who added that
14:09:27 <sc> I did as I think we need to sort out how to install in RDO/TripleO, at least for RDO, IIRC, there is an open bug
14:10:28 <sc> rhochmuth: RDO/TripleO is far different from our old distro
14:10:44 <witek> sc: are you driving this?
14:10:52 <rhochmuth> ok, thanks, that will be an interesting update
14:11:18 <sc> witek: yes, at least with the process I'm doing
14:11:32 <witek> ok, nice
14:11:37 <sc> witek: using ansible could result in a non upogradable cloud
14:13:23 <witek> jamesgu and Nicolas have worked on TSDB requirement spec
14:13:49 <witek> I've read your document but did't leave comments yet
14:14:31 <witek> last week there was request to invite Telemetry team to discuss potential integration with Gnocchi
14:14:58 <witek> are you interested in inviting them?
14:15:08 <jamesgu> witek: we need more inputs from the community from their perspective of requirements
14:16:32 <witek> should we share the etherpad and ask for feedback or is some other form better?
14:17:13 <jamesgu> we can share etherpad .. we are using it as a place for data dump at the moment
14:17:16 <jamesgu> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-db-perf
14:17:41 <jamesgu> do you have other form that you'd suggest?
14:18:05 <witek> please take a look and we'll further discuss during mid-cycle
14:19:14 <witek> we could think of using specification for this and discuss in review, but I'm not sure if it's better
14:19:21 <sc> I check in our lab and I have 3 servers free for testing, I need instructions about how to run comparisons
14:19:52 <witek> sc: great, thanks
14:20:11 <jamesgu> from tsdb perspective, would be interesting to include Gnocchi if someone is interested in driving its integration. but last week, jdavis recommended to invite telemetry for metering discussion
14:20:41 <sc> did someone write to them?
14:21:06 <witek> I haven't, wanted to ask you here again
14:21:21 <jamesgu> I believe last week the "people" voted to leave that to PTL :-)
14:21:27 <witek> :)
14:21:54 <jamesgu> sc: that's great. I likely need to take up your offer.
14:22:15 <witek> jamesgu: the decision if we should invite or invitation itself?
14:22:37 <jamesgu> who should contact the telemetry team
14:23:21 <witek> cool, so I'll contact them
14:24:09 <sc> witek: please do, we need to try to integrate or at least understand where they are going
14:24:47 <witek> what exactly are you interested in talking of 'metering discussion'?
14:26:03 <jamesgu> jdavis added the topic to the midcycle etherpad if I remember it correctly
14:26:42 <witek> Ceilometer API deprecation?
14:27:17 <jamesgu> I think so, consistency and service roadmap etc.
14:28:01 <witek> for Thursday I have invited Luka Peschke from CloudKitty project
14:28:08 <aagate> i think that topic in mid cycle was to discuss options we have with monasca-ceilometer e.g. if ceilometer collection components are still valuable, their roadmap..since ceilometer api is getting removed
14:29:17 <witek> aagate: as far as I understand they have moved the parts of API to panko, aodh and gnocchi
14:30:26 <witek> for CloudKitty, Luka has offered to shortly present the project and make a demo of their integration with Monasca
14:31:51 <witek> in the Ceilosca part I could shortly report about monasca-events-api
14:32:54 <rhochmuth> there was a discussion last week about the possiblity of gnocchi for time series storage
14:33:13 <aagate> yes that will be good re: monasca-events-api. BTW Panko is for events (but is not actively being worked upon), gnocchi api is replacement for ceilometer api. With monasca-ceilometer we do support ceilometer api, but ideally want monasca api to be used for getting metering data to
14:33:28 <rhochmuth> the idea was to add gnocchi as a metrics repo in monasca
14:34:05 <rhochmuth> there was a possiblity of getting an update from gnocchi on performance
14:34:18 <rhochmuth> metrics injest rates and query performance
14:35:10 <witek> rhochmuth: I will contact them and ask if they would like to discuss about it
14:37:01 <witek> I hope it's not too short-term
14:37:20 <sc> rhochmuth: I would like even to understand if monasca uses gnocchi and telemetry is running how do we manage dupplication of information
14:38:47 <witek> is there anything else we want to add or clarify in agenda?
14:39:16 <akiraY> GridDB progress?
14:39:20 <koji> can i add the audit log discussion?
14:39:34 <akiraY> you first
14:39:52 <witek> GridDB is already on the list
14:40:16 <witek> koji: yes, I think we can add it
14:40:35 <koji> thanks, i'll do it in tomorrow
14:41:13 <witek> might be good to schedule it early as koji is based in Japan
14:41:50 <koji> thanks, but i'd like to join all discussion :)
14:42:01 <witek> ok :)
14:42:29 <witek> anything else?
14:43:10 <witek> #topic jira library in g-r
14:43:56 <witek> prometheanfire from requirements team has requested adding jira to global-requirements
14:44:18 <witek> we use it in monasca-notification jira plugin
14:45:11 <witek> the plugin is optional, so the lib is not listed in requirements.txt, but in [extras]
14:45:42 <witek> we have two options:
14:45:54 <witek> 1. add the lib to global-requirements
14:46:29 <witek> 2. remove from setup.cfg as it's optional
14:46:48 <witek> I think there should be no problem to go with 1)
14:47:36 <witek> the check-list for adding the lib to g-r is here:
14:47:46 <witek> https://github.com/openstack/requirements/#for-new-requirements
14:48:22 <witek> I don't know about packaging, but the rest should be good
14:49:08 <witek> so, it seems to be a low-hanging fruit, so if anyone wants to take it, just propose a change to openstack/requirements
14:50:07 <joadavis1> Is there a story or ticket to reference for the request?
14:50:49 <witek> requirements is not in storyboard I guess
14:51:28 <witek> I think we don't have to track it
14:53:17 <witek> I'll be closing the meeting soon
14:53:25 <witek> do we have anything else for today?
14:54:29 <sc> nothing
14:54:39 <witek> OK, thank you
14:55:02 <witek> see you next week in gotomeeting session
14:55:16 <akiraY> See you
14:55:18 <koji> thanks
14:55:20 <haruki> thank you
14:55:22 <witek> bye
14:55:22 <cbellucci> cheers
14:55:26 <yavor_OP5> thanks!
14:55:32 <witek> #endmeeting